Re: Error message when trying to sync

2004-04-30 Thread Paul Slootman
On Thu 29 Apr 2004, Ryan Holowaychuk wrote: I am getting the following error [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# rsync 192.168.100.25::backup You're missing the local target (or source, depending on what you were trying to do). rsync: failed to connect to 192.168.100.25: Connection refused rsync

rsync 2.6.1 fails tests on OSF1

2004-04-30 Thread Gordon Lack
At least it does for me on v5.1 It is a result of a bug in sh on OSF1. $var? doesn't do file-globbing if $var contains a / (it does if it doesn't). This causes a touch command in teh merge test to fail. WORKAROUND: Set BIN_SH=xpg4 in your environment while running the test. This

large file support in 2.6.1

2004-04-30 Thread Gordon Lack
The large file support in configure tests for working file-locking. This may fail if you are building over NFS and the NFS locking isn't working. rsync doesn't actually use file-locking, so this test causes it to remove large-file support unnecessarily. A workaround might be to

rsync-2.6.2pre1: In clientname.c `AI_NUMERICHOST' undeclared

2004-04-30 Thread Jens Schleusener
Hi, I just tried to compile rsync-2.6.2pre1 under AIX 4.3 (gcc 2.95.3) and got the following compiler error: gcc -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -I./popt -c clientname.c -o clientname.o clientname.c: In function `client_name': clientname.c:121: `AI_NUMERICHOST' undeclared (first

Re: rsync-2.6.2pre1: In clientname.c `AI_NUMERICHOST' undeclared

2004-04-30 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Jens Schleusener wrote: #ifdef AI_NUMERICHOST hints.ai_flags = AI_NUMERICHOST; #endif Thanks, I've added the #ifdef as you suggested. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting,

Re: large file support in 2.6.1

2004-04-30 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:45:47AM +0100, Gordon Lack wrote: rsync doesn't actually use file-locking, so this test causes it to remove large-file support unnecessarily. Rsync uses range-locking in its daemon code to implement the max connections option. A workaround might be to build on a

Re: rsync 2.6.1 fails tests on OSF1

2004-04-30 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:22:37AM +0100, Gordon Lack wrote: $var? doesn't do file-globbing if $var contains a / (it does if it doesn't). I've tweaked the merge test to not rely on the shell's file-globbing to get things done. Thanks for the report, ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change

Re: --write-batch just hangs?

2004-04-30 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 05:00:32PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: Instead of any update, with the --write-batch=mytest argument, rsync just hangs. The batch code is still experimental (as noted in the man page), so I'm not surprised by this. The code still needs someone to test it and fix it to

[rsync-announce] rsync 2.6.2 released

2004-04-30 Thread rsync-announce
Rsync version 2.6.2 has been released. It is a bugfix release that mainly fixes a bug with the --relative option (-R) in 2.6.1 that could cause files to be transferred incorrectly. This only affected a source right at the root of the filesystem, such as / or /* (using . as the source after a

--backup requires remote connection?

2004-04-30 Thread Sean M. Kaiser
Does the --backup, --backup-dir set require that either then source or target be a remote connection? Test folder hierarchy: /Users/localskaiser/source/myfile.txt /Users/localskaiser/source/a/b/c/newfile.txt /Users/localskaiser/target /Users/localskaiser/archive I can not get the following

Re: --backup requires remote connection?

2004-04-30 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 04:19:35PM -0400, Sean M. Kaiser wrote: [skaiser-pbg4:~] localska% /usr/local/bin/rsync --delete --backup --backup-dir=/Users/localskaiser/archive -a /Users/localskaiser/source /Users/localskaiser/target This command works fine for me when used as you described. stat

Simultaneous rsyncs?

2004-04-30 Thread Marc Sarrel
Hi, What would happen if two people ran rsync on the same set of source files to the same destination machine? Do we need some sort of queuing or interlock mechanism to prevent simultaneous rsyncs? We have a script that uses rsync to distribute files from our AFS space here to the local

CVS update: rsync

2004-04-30 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Fri Apr 30 16:10:45 2004 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2142 Modified Files: clientname.c Log Message: Only refer to AI_NUMERICHOST if it is defined. Revisions: clientname.c1.21 = 1.22

CVS update: rsync

2004-04-30 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Fri Apr 30 17:53:51 2004 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22498 Modified Files: NEWS Log Message: Mention the last few tweaks that made it into 2.6.2. Revisions: NEWS1.172 = 1.173

CVS update: rsync/packaging/lsb

2004-04-30 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Fri Apr 30 18:03:33 2004 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync/packaging/lsb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25000/packaging/lsb Modified Files: rsync.spec Log Message: Preparing for release of 2.6.2 Revisions: rsync.spec 1.14 = 1.15

CVS update: rsync

2004-04-30 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Fri Apr 30 18:03:33 2004 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25000 Modified Files: configure configure.in rsync.1 rsync.yo rsyncd.conf.5 rsyncd.conf.yo Log Message: Preparing for release of 2.6.2 Revisions: configure

CVS update: rsync

2004-04-30 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Fri Apr 30 19:14:52 2004 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6046 Modified Files: NEWS Log Message: Additional testing confirmed the limited scope of the sources affected by the -R sorting bug. Revisions: NEWS1.173 =

CVS update: rsync

2004-04-30 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Fri Apr 30 20:39:29 2004 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22685 Modified Files: README Log Message: Changed the order that ssh and rsh are mentioned. Revisions: README 1.28 = 1.29