Re: [PATCH] fix read-batch SEGFAULT [WAS: --write-batch just hangs?]

2004-05-06 Thread Jos Backus
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 08:14:22PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: Just so I'm on the right page, AFAICT, batch mode doesn't work _at all_. If that's the case, it could be that the batch mode code needs to be updated to work with recent changes to rsync. Last time I tried running the tests

Re: coder wanted

2004-05-06 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Wed, 2004-05-05 19:00:28 -0800, Web Hosting Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [snip] So you want [EMAIL PROTECTED] to rsync machine_1:/some/path to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in a path machine_2:/some/other/path ? This should be done via ssh, right? Easy, that. - On

Re: rsync and Perl programming

2004-05-06 Thread Tim Conway
escape your @. I don't remember the details, but I know it got chewed up by something in a past application. Tim Conway Unix System Administration Contractor - IBM Global Services desk:3032734776 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi everybody - I'm trying to write a Perl wrapper for some rsync tasks that

Re: [PATCH] fix read-batch SEGFAULT [WAS: --write-batch just hangs?]

2004-05-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 11:34:29PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 08:14:22PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: Just so I'm on the right page, AFAICT, batch mode doesn't work _at all_. If that's the case, it could be that the batch mode code needs to be updated to work with

progress redirects

2004-05-06 Thread Adam Doppelt
Hi. I use rsync to suck down a large amount of data every night using a cron job that logs to a file. If you run rsync --progress and redirect to a log file you end up with the progress for each file piled up onto a single line. \r is generally ignored by editors and viewers. That leads to my

Re: progress redirects

2004-05-06 Thread Tim Conway
How about not using --progress when it's running from cron? ... unless you're tailing the logfile, which should also work fine as-is. If you need to process the logs otherwise later, feed it to sed 's/^H.*^H///' to dump the display crap... or is it ^M instead of ^H? Those aren't literals.

Re: progress redirects

2004-05-06 Thread Adam Doppelt
The rsync jobs take several hours to run and I check up on them from time to time. The new progress features (110, 10% of 1100) are especially nice and I don't want to lose them. I can definitely script my way around this one but it's also possible to solve it nicely within rsync. Adam -

rsync include / exclude

2004-05-06 Thread Michael C. Davis
Hi, I'm using rsync to move the contents of one drive to another as part of upgrading from an old Linux installation to a newer one. I have a script which uses includes and excludes to select what to keep and what to throw away, but for some reason my include rule isn't triggering when I think it

Re: rsync 2.6.2 --daemon Problem

2004-05-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:02:41AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote: If that's the root cause of the problem, skipping the IPV6 socket when that call fails should suffice. I've decided against using this change as I think it would prevent some older Linux (any other?) systems from accepting IPv6

Re: [PATCH] fix read-batch SEGFAULT [WAS: --write-batch just hangs?]

2004-05-06 Thread Jos Backus
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 09:11:15AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 11:34:29PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 08:14:22PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: Just so I'm on the right page, AFAICT, batch mode doesn't work _at all_. If that's the case, it

rsync-2.6.2: NFS clients confused after an rsync

2004-05-06 Thread Brian Childs
We use rsync to update an nfs server. After an update, we noticed that a large number of clients didn't see the updated data. It took me a while to be able to reliably reproduce this problem, but it happens on old and new versions of rysnc. It also happens across all the platforms we use here

Re: rsync include / exclude

2004-05-06 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:20:34PM -0500, Michael C. Davis wrote: I've narrowed it down to a test script for a representative case which, again, should be working but isn't. You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous of which is, Never get involved in a land war in Asia.

Re: rsync include / exclude

2004-05-06 Thread Michael C. Davis
At 04:50 PM 5/6/04 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: You fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous of which is, Never get involved in a land war in Asia. But only slightly less well known is this: Never exclude '*', when death is on the line! Ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha! [Clunk!]

Re: [PATCH] fix read-batch SEGFAULT [WAS: --write-batch just hangs?]

2004-05-06 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 11:34:29PM -0700, Jos Backus wrote: On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 08:14:22PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: Just so I'm on the right page, AFAICT, batch mode doesn't work _at all_. If that's the case, it could be that the batch mode code needs to be updated to work with

CVS update: rsync

2004-05-06 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Thu May 6 21:08:01 2004 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31633 Modified Files: options.c Log Message: Introduced long-option names for -4 and -6. Revisions: options.c 1.147 = 1.148

CVS update: rsync

2004-05-06 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Thu May 6 21:26:46 2004 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv1652 Modified Files: socket.c Log Message: - Updated the comments for open_socket_in(). - Changed open_socket_in() to return an array of ints with a trailing -1 value to

CVS update: rsync

2004-05-06 Thread Wayne Davison
Date: Fri May 7 00:18:37 2004 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsync In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8096 Modified Files: rsync.1 rsync.yo Log Message: Document the -4, -6, --ipv4, --ipv6 options. Revisions: rsync.1 1.184 = 1.185