Wayne,
It's taken a little while for me to get more familiar with the
code, but I think I've reached a good breakpoint in improving
batch-mode. Let me highlight some of the changes in the
attached patch:
* --write-batch and --read-batch arguments are no lon
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 18:01, Greger Cronquist wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> This issue solved itself rather annoyingly since we use flash memory in
> our newer devices (which had slipped my mind). So we must erase the
> memory first and then load.
Last time I played with flash, you could erase a block
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:16:19PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
> Wayne Davison wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I am making an extraordinary claim: rysnc seems to copy all my files,
> >>not just ones that have changed or new files.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Use
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 06:21:15AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463
>
>Summary: poor performance with large block size
>Product: rsync
>Version: 2.6.2
> Platform: x86
> OS/Version: other
>
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:30:16PM +0800, Jason Potter wrote:
> Hi There,
>
>
>
> This post is brought about due to the following two:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10702.html
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10709.html
>
>
>
> I have a situation
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:37:25PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:30:04PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Do any "rsync developers" care to confirm/deny? [...] I've used rsync
> > over NFS with no problems.
>
> It has been said many times before that using network-mo
Wayne,
That's great stuff. What do you think about a cut-n-paste of this example and
explanation into the documentation somewhere?
-Chris
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:02:17PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:16:30AM -0400, Collins, Kevin wrote:
> > Number of files: 161530
>
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 12:30:04PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Do any "rsync developers" care to confirm/deny? [...] I've used rsync
> over NFS with no problems.
It has been said many times before that using network-mounted disks is
suboptimal because rsync is optimizing the data transfer,
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:34:46PM +0100, Andrew Smith-MAGAZINES wrote:
> My personal preference was to mount a share from the file server on the client and
> essentially do the sync all locally on the client but rsync doesn't seem to like
> doing this very much (apparently this is advised agains
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
I am making an extraordinary claim: rysnc seems to copy all my files,
not just ones that have changed or new files.
Use either -t (preferred) or -c (slower). See also -a.
..wayne..
Wayne... Thanks for the repl
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 04:35:39PM -0400, King, Daniel wrote:
> Could you tell me what I am doing wrong with this signature?
You need to fetch the key so gpg can check the signature (I signed the
file, not Dave). The key is available through the public keyserver
network. One way to get it is to
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 02:14:32PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> The description of --link-dest in the rsync man page should probably
> clarify that DIR is, unless it is an absolute path, relative to the
> destination directory, not the CWD.
This is in the --link-dest description in CVS:
Like --
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 08:26:33PM +0100, Gareth wrote:
> I am making an extraordinary claim: rysnc seems to copy all my files,
> not just ones that have changed or new files.
Use either -t (preferred) or -c (slower). See also -a.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.sam
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:16:30AM -0400, Collins, Kevin wrote:
> Number of files: 161530
> Number of files transferred: 327
> Total file size: 97936829135 bytes
> Total transferred file size: 945709165 bytes
> Literal data: 741315984 bytes
> Matched data: 204393181 bytes
> File list size: 3446549
Thanks, Wayne. I was using Firefox.
Could you tell me what I am doing wrong with this signature?
$ ll rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz.sig rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz
-rw--- 1 dking users 515402 Jun 16 09:36 rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz
-rw--- 1 dking users 65 Jun 16 14:49
rsync-2.6.2.tar.
Hi
I am making an extraordinary claim: rysnc seems to copy all my files,
not just ones that have changed or new files.
rsync version 2.6.0 protocol version 27
Debian 3.0 Woody
I have tested this with one simple file, my example is shown below.
Does anyone have any suggestions to rectify this?
Re
The description of --link-dest in the rsync man page should probably
clarify that DIR is, unless it is an absolute path, relative to the
destination directory, not the CWD.
-Paul
--
Paul Smith | Chicago IL, USA
PGP: http://info.cnt.org/~paul/paul-key.asc | AIM: thaislump
It's our principles tha
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:42:45AM -0400, King, Daniel wrote:
> http://samba.anu.edu.au/ftp/rsync/rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz.sig
I can do a wget of that URL without problem. I get a very weird error
if I try to use Firefox 0.9, though, which appears to be caused by their
web server returning bogus MIME i
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:51:14PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot rsync
>
> anyway, how do I update?
cd rsync
cvs up
The server details are remembered inside the CVS dirs, so once you
checkout, you don't need to remind cvs where the files came from
(y
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 03:15:00PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> e.g.
> rsync -x -e ssh src_dir remote:dst_share
> ssh remote "/usr/local/bin/cleanup"
You don't need the separate ssh connection if you use --rsync-path to
point to a script that first runs rsync (using the supplied args) and
then d
My personal preference was to mount a share from the file server on the client and
essentially do the sync all locally on the client but rsync doesn't seem to like doing
this very much (apparently this is advised against),
What doesn't rsync like? Do you mean something like a rsync between a
lo
Hi All...
I use rsync to backup most of my servers to an offsite co-located server.
I've been using this setup for about a month or so now and have been
generally pleased with the operation as a whole.
But one thing bothers me:
I use the following command to actually do the transfers:
rsync -ae
Hi, folks.
I'm having some trouble getting to the source signature for rsync:
http://samba.anu.edu.au/ftp/rsync/rsync-2.6.2.tar.gz.sig
Several other mirrors seem to have the same problem, i.e., the file is
unreadable. Is it just me?
Thanks,
A. Daniel King, System Analyst
Fiserv, Inc.
HP-UX, S
Thank you Wayne, It works.
Jiang Wensheng
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2004-06-16
>On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 12:05:09AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
>> Adding an option to make rsync do this wouldn't be very hard
>
>I've whipped up a patch and checked-in the diff to the patches dir. If
>you ei
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1463
Summary: poor performance with large block size
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
It is the 55 function variety of Swiss Army Knife already and my boss is asking me to
add yet another blade. :-)
wally
-Original Message-
From: Chris Shoemaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 1:51 PM
To: Wayne Davison
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: how to exclu
Hi There,
This post is brought about due to the following two:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10702.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg10709.html
I have a situation where I need to upload large files over an unstable link
(resuming is a requirement) an
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 11:33:29AM +0100, Stuart Halliday wrote:
> Hi as I'm a real newbie to rsync I'd better apoligise if this is 'old hat'.
Its OK! the only silly question is that which is not asked.
We all were newbies once or twice...
[SNIP]
> The DOS shell command I'm using is this:
>
>
Hi There
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:49:56PM -0500, Paula A. LeBlanc wrote:
> Rsync version 2.6.0 on a HP B.11.00
>
> Rsync version 2.4.6 on Solaris 8
Make sure youre using same version of rsync on both ends. Mismatches
like this one have been known to produce odd results.
Regards
Tomasz Ciolek
Hi as I'm a real newbie to rsync I'd better apoligise if this is 'old hat'.
I'm trying to get to grips with rsync and I've set up rysnc as a server on a redhat 8
linux pc using a simple rsyncd.conf
I then tried to list some files placed in the rsync server by using a commandline
shell to this
Wayne Davison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Yup, I was thinking the same thing. One way to make your feature safer
> would be to turn it into a config-file setting (and leave the script
> outside the download/upload area). Since a non-daemon setup should be
>
Hi again,
This issue solved itself rather annoyingly since we use flash memory in
our newer devices (which had slipped my mind). So we must erase the
memory first and then load.
Cheers, Greger
Donovan Baarda wrote:
G'day,
From: "Greger Cronquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
compiled binaries ar
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:54:34AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 10:00:56AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> > make_bak_dir mkdir
> > "/backup/naxos.premier-lnc.com/2004-06-09/home/ddegrolard/profile/Local
> > Settings/Application Data" failed: File exists
>
> This
33 matches
Mail list logo
