RE: DU and Hard Links?

2004-06-19 Thread Max Kipness
> -Original Message- > From: Wayne Davison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 3:22 PM > To: Max Kipness > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: DU and Hard Links? > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 01:55:02PM -0500, Max Kipness wrote: > > But what I would like to do is a

Re: [PATCH] make write_batch local

2004-06-19 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 10:20:57AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 07:09:46PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > > I hope you have the time to review this patch and comment. > > The patch looks good on first inspection. I don't like the change to > the whole-file default, thoug

Re: DU and Hard Links?

2004-06-19 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 01:55:02PM -0500, Max Kipness wrote: > But what I would like to do is automatically get the size of the last > created hard linked directory daily through a script. Try the attached perl script. It counts the blocks in the arguments you specify (like du does), but it leave

DU and Hard Links?

2004-06-19 Thread Max Kipness
Hi, I'm doing a 30 day rotational backup using rysnc. If I go to the root of the backup directory and use: du --max-depth=1 -h, it gives me the actual space being taken up by each incremental directory, the space being taken by the current directory, and then the total of all. For example: 4

[Bug 1467] Hash table generation seems to be flawed

2004-06-19 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1467 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: rsync, Windows, --backup-dir, parameters

2004-06-19 Thread NasBackup Team
The backup should be on the machine 192.168.0.100 (the remote on), And not on the local one. Is this what you meant ? Regards, Milutin Voinivich http://www.NasBackup.com/ - Original Message - From: "bzels123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 2:

[Bug 1467] Hash table generation seems to be flawed

2004-06-19 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1467 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-06-19 02:18 --- The way the code seems to work is as follows: A sorted list of hashes and their block numbers are generated (targets). They're sorted so that identical hashes are nume

[Bug 1467] New: Hash table generation seems to be flawed

2004-06-19 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1467 Summary: Hash table generation seems to be flawed Product: rsync Version: 2.6.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp