[Bug 3174] New: Patch for specifying zlib compression level

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3174 Summary: Patch for specifying zlib compression level Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug 3174] Patch for specifying zlib compression level

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3174 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-17 04:14 --- Created an attachment (id=1517) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1517action=view) rsync compression level patch -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 3175] devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-17 04:36 --- Created an attachment (id=1518) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1518action=view) Transcript of unsuccessful attempts I have other transcripts with me

[Bug 3175] New: devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 Summary: devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

Rsync problem

2005-10-17 Thread Srinivas Kotapally
All I am having a problem with rsyncing 2 directories in my network. Here is the situation: 1. I have a directory tree on the 1 server say: SOURCE 2. I have to rsync this directory tree on a backup server, say: Backup 3. This is a huge tree (about 8-9 GB) that grows by about 2-3 % a day. 4.

[Bug 3159] VA_COPY() brokenness

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3159 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2608] know deleted files when --update'ing

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2608 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3117] rsyncing a file to a partially downloaded copy is extremely slow

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3117 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 2760] some time rsync is exiting with received SIGUSR1 or SIGINT (code 20) at rsync.c(229).

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2760 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 3175] devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional

[Bug 3175] devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-17 12:27 --- Created an attachment (id=1519) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1519action=view) Allow --link-dest to affects symlinks and devices I've worked up a

rsync output question

2005-10-17 Thread Sameer Kamat
Hello, I am synchronizingone ~15GBfile over the network. This file from the previous day exists on the destination and I synchronized today's file over. This is the output. Number of files: 1Number of files transferred: 1Total file size: 15919685632 bytesTotal transferred file size:

[Bug 3174] Patch for specifying zlib compression level

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3174 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1517 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 3174] Patch for specifying zlib compression level

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3174 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional

Re: Rsync problem

2005-10-17 Thread Matt McCutchen
By default, rsync decides it can skip transferring the data from a source file to a destination file if the files have the same size and last-modified time. Did you preserve last-modified times when you extracted the files onto the backup machine? If you used tar, the times should have been

Re: Incomplete sync

2005-10-17 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 10:45:24PM +1000, David wrote: could be an issue but I have set the vmware machines to update time via ntp on a regular basis and made the --modify-window=2010 so I thought I should be fine. I don't see why you want timestamps to be able to differ by 33.5 minutes.

[Bug 3175] devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-17 15:27 --- Oh! I had no idea --list-dest -wasn't- supposed to work with devices (and symlinks), given that the documentation for the option said nothing about the restriction and

[Bug 3175] it would be nice if --link-dest matched up devices and symlinks too

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1518 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 3175] it would be nice if --link-dest matched up devices and symlinks too

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #1521 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 3175] it would be nice if --link-dest matched up devices and symlinks too

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal --- Additional Comments

[Bug 3186] New: Surprisingly large unshared memory usage

2005-10-17 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 Summary: Surprisingly large unshared memory usage Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3