On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 06:33:44PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> But the parts of the destination paths following ~/www are not always
> suffixes of the source paths, so --relative with dot-dirs is not good
> enough.
While rsync doesn't currently support this, but you might be able to
accomplish
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:52:31PM +0900, Chan, Alex (Exchange) wrote:
> It should not have the bin prefixed there. Tried rsync -vvv
> rsync://hpux1/app/bin/. and just app/bin
> they were the same. It only works with app/bin/*
I can't reproduce this with any version of rsync I tried (and I tried
Hi
Wayne,
I see this old
subject re HP-UX box may have differente behavior when the path is
sanitized.
We have an HP-UX box
just upgraded to 2.6.6 and seems to have the same behavior in
that
rsync -vvv
rsync://hpux1/app/bin/
recv_file_name(bin)
recv_file_name(bin/toolkit)
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 06:52:22PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I want to be sure that it is in rock-solid shape first.
FYI, there was one bug I found in the patch that I fixed: the gettag2()
macro needed to mask the s1 variable to generate a proper "tag" value.
I fixed this by just getting rid
Rsync people,
I am preparing to overhaul my Web site's build system, and I am looking
for a convenient way to collect files and directories from various
places on my computer and put them at various locations inside a
destination directory to be posted to my Web site. So far, my script
has been r
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 06:58 -0800, lsk wrote:
> Could you give an example with syntax for rsync using file
> option "--files-rom=FILE".
If my-list in the current directory contains
a
b
b/c
b/d
b/d/e ,
then the command
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:08:02PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> So, perhaps it should be moved into the -a collection?
I've certainly considered it. My main hesitation is not wanting to
adversely effect existing rsync users. I haven't currently decided that
I want to do this.
One alternative t
>>And a performance question: would it be faster to pass the complete list of
>>datafiles to rsync in one fell swoop, for instance using --files-from
rather
>>than running rsync individually on each one?
>
>
> It would be somewhat faster to pass the entire list because you incur
> the overhead
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 18:40 -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
I did something similar to what lsk is doing a few months back, I believe using
rsync 2.6.5. I wrote a script to query the database for all the datafiles and
rsync'ed them individually by specifying the full path to th
On Sun 19 Feb 2006, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I've just released rsync 2.6.7pre2 -- the second pre-release version of
> the imminent 2.6.7 release. Please test this out and email the rsync
> mailing list with any questions, comments, bug reports, etc. Thanks!
I love the --chmod option :-) Works f
On Fri 24 Feb 2006, Wayne Davison wrote:
> So, these days -H should be nice and fast.
So, perhaps it should be moved into the -a collection?
Paul Slootman
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/sma
John Van Essen wrote:
>Inasmuch as I can follow some of the simpler optimizations, I'm at a
>loss as to what is being so dramatically improved for large files.
>
>Can you write up the little piece that you would add to the NEWS file
>and describe (in layman's terms is possible) what the benefit is
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This would be such an improvement for really large files that I'm
> considering putting this into 2.6.7pre3. However, I want to be sure
> that it is in rock-solid shape first. If anyone wants to help with the
> testing and/or the
--- Philippe BEAU wrote:
> I would like to know for each module i define in my rsyncd.conf (on my
> backup server side) if it is possible to have the transfer logging (host,
> ip address, ...) in my mysql server or in a separate log file for each
> module.
You can also use my patch for ODBC datab
14 matches
Mail list logo
