It is just the performance issue. However, this issue is unacceptable
because of the number of files I am synching.. millions.. sending all of
these resource forks is just asking for trouble... using RsyncX I only
transfer a few thousand files each session but this error just transfers
hi every one
i dont know whether rsync excludes the open file while taking backup or
not.?
My problem is how to handle open file backup(the files which are open by
any process ) with rsync .?
Thanks
Harshal
SPsoft
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
A recipe for Windows 2003 systems (contributed by Rob Bosch) can be found at
http://www.itefix.no/phpws/index.php?module=faqFAQ_op=viewFAQ_id=81
Rgrds Tev
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of IMCC
Sent: 22. mars 2006 13:27
To:
hi,
I am working on Backup appliction.
So I am understanding rsync_2.6.6.
I have to take a backup of files on a drive But
I have to exclude those file in a drive which are open.
I want to know whether rsync exclude open files
while taking backup ? .
and how rsync
lsk wrote:
But I have tried various options including --inplace,--no-whole-file etc.,
for last few weeks but all the results show me removing the destination
server oracle datafiles and after that doing an rsync -vz from source is
faster than copying(rsyncing) over the old files that are
Also I use the rsync version rsync version 2.6.5 protocol version 29 does
this version include this patch dynamic_hash.diff or do we need to
install it seperately.
At destination server I use rsync version 2.6.6 protocol version 29
anyhow u said that doesn't matter.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 07:16:19PM +0300, ? ??? wrote:
multiplexing overflow 101:7104843 [receiver]
This indicates that the protocol got corrupted somehow because that is
saying that the receiver got a MSG_DELETED message with a 7104843-byte
buffer attached (which rsync is telling you is
I'm using rsync v.2.6.6 (with protocol version 29).
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 07:16:19PM +0300, ? ??? wrote:
multiplexing overflow 101:7104843 [receiver]
This indicates that the protocol got corrupted somehow because that is
saying that the receiver got a
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 08:03:30PM +0700, David Favro wrote:
Here's a small patch that gives better diagnostics on the daemon side
if it fails to start up due to inability to create or bind the socket.
Thanks for the patch. I've considered it and your misgivings, and have
come up with the
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 21 Mar 2006, lsk wrote:
I don't know how it would work if we do rsync with the files--from option ?
I'm not sure how rsync behaves when confronted with a network problem
during a session, so I won't give an answer to that.
However, doing individual files sounds
lsk wrote:
Also I use the rsync version rsync version 2.6.5 protocol version 29 does
this version include this patch dynamic_hash.diff or do we need to
install it seperately.
Sorry. You will need to get the 2.6.7 sources, and then apply the patch
yourself and compile rsync.
Please do
Hi, All!
I've got some errors while trying to sync 2 directory trees.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] rsync -azv way:/www/sin/ /www/sin/
receiving file list ... done
./
[snip]
docs/members/popol/pop0207.con
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (275727980 bytes received so far)
[receiver]
rsync error:
don't update rsync on a Mac OS X system
because you don't have the -E (--extended-attributes) with the
release of rsync-2.6.7 from source
this is important, you don't have any chance to copy a meta data of a
file if you use any other release of rsync
the version of rsync included in the
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 19:27 +0530, IMCC wrote:
I have to take a backup of files on a drive But
I have to exclude those file in a drive which are open.
I want to know whether rsync exclude open files
while taking backup ? .
Rsync sends all files without checking whether they
And a performance question: would it be faster to pass the complete list
of
datafiles to rsync in one fell swoop, for instance using --files-from
rather
than running rsync individually on each one?
It would be somewhat faster to pass the entire list because you incur
the overhead of
I am trying to use the syntax:
rsync -av -e ssh -l ssh-user [EMAIL PROTECTED]::module /dest
found at http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync.html
but am getting the following:
rsync -av -e ssh -l sshuser rhost.asu.edu::home uc-sirc1/home/
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received
I was wondering if anyone has used rsync to generate forests of
symlinks which point
to a specified hierarchy.
for background see;
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.perl.misc/browse_thread/thread/91598a037e22ce8f/d655d9b6bfe36beb?lnk=stq=spectral+forest+symlinksrnum=1#d655d9b6bfe36beb
It
hi,
I am currently working on backup
application.
So I am understanding rsync_2.6.6.
As rsync take backup of all files whether
open or not.
I have to know whether rsync implement
file locking
mechanism that is shared and exclusive
locks while
opening file.
Date: Wed Mar 22 09:21:46 2006
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync/patches
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv26927
Modified Files:
acls.diff
Log Message:
Improved the opening comments.
Revisions:
acls.diff 1.114 = 1.115
Date: Wed Mar 22 09:24:41 2006
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync/patches
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28788
Modified Files:
adaptec_acl_mods.diff
Log Message:
Fixed a failing hunk.
Revisions:
adaptec_acl_mods.diff 1.4 = 1.5
Date: Wed Mar 22 17:48:59 2006
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsync
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv8518
Modified Files:
socket.c
Log Message:
If open_socket_in() fails, we now log the reasons why.
Revisions:
socket.c1.118 = 1.119
21 matches
Mail list logo
