Charles,
Are you preparing to use continusync for a real-world continuous
mirroring job? I'm afraid this may be an exercise in frustration unless
you have a lot of time on your hands to fill in the gaps in its
implementation. Instead, you might like to use Darryl Dixon's
continuous mirroring set
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> 1. Wait for a short time after a change to the source occurs before
> propagating it. If a file is created and then rapidly deleted, no
> action is necessary. Implementing this fully would require a data
> structure to remember pending changes; it would have to be somewhat
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 13:22 -0800, Charles Polisher wrote:
> I am experimenting with Matt McCutchen's excellent continusync script,
> and I'm having an issue. (My copy of continusync has been modified from
> the original
> http://mattmccutchen.net/utils/continusync by adding this @ line 227:
>
>
I am experimenting with Matt McCutchen's excellent continusync script,
and I'm having an issue. (My copy of continusync has been modified from
the original
http://mattmccutchen.net/utils/continusync by adding this @ line 227:
<$fromInwt>;
as suggested by Matt.)
The problem is easily reprodu
-t is good enough for me. It checks size and time and would be heaps
faster than chksum.
It has never caused me a problem as yet.
Whether size & time over chksum is good enough for you is up to you.
Craig...
-Original Message-
From: Tang, Clayton (Yiqi) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: S
Hi everybody,
Until know i synchronized a few directories full of binaries with
"--checksum" options, it took each time a lot
of time since rsync "mdsum" each file contained in my directories.
Then I decided to skip "--checksum" option to let rsync work only of files
size and files mtime and speed
Hello,
there are problems syncing files with special charcters in the filename.
The special characters in the filename are displayed as a question mark.
During synchronization, the rsync tells the file is vanished.
Here is the standard output with level 1 verbosity. Higher verbosity
levels dont g
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 19:37 +0100, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Morgan Read wrote:
> > Can anyone help me with the following error - is it serious; is the
> > file
> > transferred; are the other files transferred?
>
> The file is transferred as are the other files.
>
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 11:31 +0100, Daniel Maher wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 22:55 +1300, Morgan Read wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rsync -a -X -A -z -v /home/morgan/Documents
> > 192.168.1.30:/home/morgan/Documents
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
> > building file list ... done
> > rsyn
Hi,
I now have a port of rsync running on Symbian S60v3 (with openc/pips)
which works in both directions :) It is setup to run in daemon mode on
the phone and only allow connections from localhost, with remote access
granted through reverse ssh port forwarding or a similar VPN technology.
For
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, people here are very conservative
and shy away from kernel modules. I will look into the pull process.
Regards,
Clayton
--
Clayton (Yiqi) Tang, LMX / Autotrader Production Management
212-526-7493, 745-7th Ave, New York, NY 10019
-Original Message-
Fr
Thanks for the reply. How safe is it NOT to chksum? Does rsync use size
instead or date instead or both together?
Actually splitting is what I just did. I split 250 hosts into 4 lists
and running 4 rsync jobs from the master in parallel. This causes
80%-90% total CPU usage, still runs for about
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 11:45 +0100, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> autoconf
> autoheader
> The only "problem file" is then the proto.h. However, a quick
> inspection shows that you just need to add the lines:
After applying the patches, adding the indicated lines to proto.h, and
runnin
On Nov 16, 2007, at 10:08 AM, Daniel Maher wrote:
Thank you for your reply. My exact sequence is as follows:
$ tar -xzf rsync-2.6.9.tar.gz
$ cd rsync-2.6.9
$ patch -p1 < patches/acls.diff
$ patch -p1 < patches/xattrs.diff
$ patch -p1 < patches/fake-super.diff
Ok. I see now what's wrong. Someh
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 19:35 +0100, Wesley W. Terpstra wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007, at 3:02 PM, Daniel Maher wrote:
> > I can successfully apply both acls.diff and xattrs.diff to the 2.6.9
> > source, however, fake-super.diff is not as smooth:
> > $ patch -p1 < patches/fake-super.diff
>
> Did you app
15 matches
Mail list logo
