bandwidth issue

2009-03-11 Thread Gero Pflanz
Hello, I have a question concerning the performance of rsync beteen two sites, one in India one in Germany. File exchange between 2 Linux-machines is done using rsync-3.0.5 (typical file size 1.5 GB). Destination machine is: Linux machine1 2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Sep 25 02:16:15 EDT

Re: bandwidth issue

2009-03-11 Thread Ryan Malayter
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Gero Pflanz gero.pfl...@gmx.de wrote: Is it sufficient to change only those 2 parameters ? Will this also change the buffersize af the other host (via rsync communication)? In the logs I do not get any information that the sockopts parameter is changing

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6183] New: rsync error file too large (27)

2009-03-11 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6183 Summary: rsync error file too large (27) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6183] rsync error file too large (27)

2009-03-11 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6183 --- Comment #1 from bros...@gmail.com 2009-03-11 11:38 CST --- Justed tested using rsync 3.0.2, and it works fine (same file, same servers) so the problem occursd using rsync 3.0.4 -- Configure bugmail:

Re: proposal to speed rsync with lots of files

2009-03-11 Thread Mag Gam
Using inotify with rsync is a great idea. If one has a job that runs daily to get differences on a very large filesytem with very small files, then can do this (assuming the initial copy is already completed): inotify watch source filesystem (or tree) take down all the notices in a txt file