verbosity: list files without summary?

2009-03-31 Thread Mi
Is there a way to set the verbosity so that transferred/changed files are listed, but not the summary information. In other words, how can I get rid of this, while still seeing the file list: building file list ... done sent 108 bytes received 20 bytes 256.00 bytes/sec total size is

synchronizing hard linked trees

2009-03-31 Thread Dieter Stüken
Hi, I have to synchronize a directory tree of one machine with a tree on a remote machine. The tree on the remote machine is used read only. In addition I clone the current target tree before each synchronizing using hardlinks to be able to switch back to any previous version if the

Re: is it possible to continue rsync after network interruption?

2009-03-31 Thread Larry Irwin
If you check the output and see that it failed, you can run the process again and it will pick up (after re-building the lists) where it left off. There is some overhead for the list rebuild and checking the hash's of the previously updated files, but it is minimal. This is the method I use to

Re: verbosity: list files without summary?

2009-03-31 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:43:51AM +0200, Mi wrote: Is there a way to set the verbosity so that transferred/changed files are listed, but not the summary information. See the --out-format (aka --log-format in older rsync versions) and the -i (--itemize-changes) options (since -i is an easy way

Help With File transfer of files named Apple* + Lacie 5Big RAID

2009-03-31 Thread Jameson Giebler
Hello Rsync Community, I have been using rsync for several years to backup servers across an array of different areas. I have run into a new problem that I cannot find an answer for. We just recently purchased a Lacie 5Big Network RAID:

Help With File transfer of files named Apple* + Lacie 5Big RAID

2009-03-31 Thread Jameson Giebler
Hello Rsync Community, I have been using rsync for several years to backup servers across an array of different areas. I have run into a new problem that I cannot find an answer for. We just recently purchased a Lacie 5Big Network RAID:

Re: is it possible to continue rsync after network interruption?

2009-03-31 Thread Matthias Meyer
Larry Irwin wrote: If you check the output and see that it failed, you can run the process again and it will pick up (after re-building the lists) where it left off. There is some overhead for the list rebuild and checking the hash's of the previously updated files, but it is minimal. This

Typo in rsync man page

2009-03-31 Thread Jesse Weinstein
In the online copy of the rsync man page, as of 28 Dec 2008, the sentence: For convenience, one additional file is creating when the write-batch option is used. should be: For convenience, one additional file is created when the write-batch option is used. (creating - created). Thanks for all

Re: is it possible to continue rsync after network interruption?

2009-03-31 Thread Matthias Meyer
Larry Irwin wrote: It looks like my emails are being rejected at the list site... Don;t know why... But, if you start the same process 10 minutes later and let it run another 23 hours, you should get farther along each time. It has taken me as much as 2 weeks to get the intial image that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6240] New: rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression?

2009-03-31 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 Summary: rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression? Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6240] rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression?

2009-03-31 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 --- Comment #1 from m...@lbl.gov 2009-03-31 18:40 CST --- Sorry, that should've said 3.0.4 and 3.0.5. I have not tested 3.0.6 or 3.1 (which have not yet been released AFAIK). -- Configure bugmail:

Re: Help With File transfer of files named Apple* + Lacie 5Big RAID

2009-03-31 Thread henri
Hi there, Which version of rsync are you using? The following link has some details regarding compiling the latest version of rsync on Mac OS X : http://connect.homeunix.com/lbackup/developer/rsync_hfs Also, I am unsure if it will make any difference, but perhaps the underlying file system

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6240] rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression?

2009-03-31 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6240] rsync 3.0.x -x/--one-file-system regression?

2009-03-31 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6240 --- Comment #3 from way...@samba.org 2009-03-31 22:30 CST --- Created an attachment (id=4041) -- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=4041action=view) The one-word fix for the issue This fixes the issue in both 3.0.6dev and

itemized option (-ii) with --log-file and --log-file format

2009-03-31 Thread Jignesh Shah
Hi, I am using rsync3.0.5 both side. I have been using below rsync command to get the sync info. rsync -av --stats -ii --log-file-format='CONTENTS: %i %f %l %o %b' --log-file='/tmp/rsync-test' src/ dest/ I noticed that the output format for this command is different from rsync V2.6.* . Is there

[SCM] The rsync repository. branch, b3.0.x, updated. v3.0.5-22-gbf350d7

2009-03-31 Thread rsync-cvs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project The rsync repository.. The branch, b3.0.x has been updated via bf350d7b314714b82b1fe386af08c1a1a70b2b75 (commit) from

[SCM] The rsync repository. branch, master, updated. v3.0.3-168-g7f2591e

2009-03-31 Thread rsync-cvs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project The rsync repository.. The branch, master has been updated via 7f2591eaea2208c2bdc55eb66df3fd3734d45c96 (commit) from

[SCM] The rsync repository. branch, master, updated. v3.0.3-169-g1a85a96

2009-03-31 Thread rsync-cvs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project The rsync repository.. The branch, master has been updated via 1a85a969a7f1283e90e289c686d2d4fd2d78ff80 (commit) from