DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6251] security: rsync executes remote commands

2009-04-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6251 muel...@relog.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

double-side synchronisation

2009-04-08 Thread Кузьмин Андрей Николаев ич
Help me Tell it is possible to make double-side synchronisation of two servers? So that it passed only on time. For example at an identical set of files on two servers any file on the first to change, i.e. for it time modify will exchange. It means becomes newer and it is necessary to transfer

Re: double-side synchronisation

2009-04-08 Thread Cyd
Hello, I think you will have to run two commands of rsync from PC1 to Server1 and after to Server2. (Case Server1 and Server2 are on different location) If both server are on LAN, you could make rsync from PC1 to Server1 and do after that a sync of Server1 to Server2. Regards, CyD On Wed,

order transfers by file size

2009-04-08 Thread Victoria Muntean
Is it possible to have rsync order transfers by file size (smallest files first) ? Would it be a big patch ? Thanks Viki -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting,

Re: double-side synchronisation

2009-04-08 Thread Victoria Muntean
Tell it is possible to make double-side synchronisation of two servers? For two-way file sync, try unison [1]. Rsync does one-way synchronization. Viki [1] http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/ -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or

Re: order transfers by file size

2009-04-08 Thread Yan Seiner
On Wed, April 8, 2009 8:19 am, Victoria Muntean wrote: Is it possible to have rsync order transfers by file size (smallest files first) ? Ooooh, I like that. I have a client that has a bad habit of creating a 5GB zipfile, that, of course, fails to rsync across 3,000 miles. Since it's a zip

Re: itemized option (-ii) with --log-file and --log-file format

2009-04-08 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 07:41:12AM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: No, I also want to log files that are not transferred. You can use -vv instead of -ii to get a list of uptodate items, but no mention of attribute changes (non-transferred files are all uptodate). In rsync 3.1.0dev you can get that

Re: order transfers by file size

2009-04-08 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 08 Apr 2009, Yan Seiner wrote: As long as we're on that topic, a size limit on file size to be transferred would be nice. --max-size=SIZE don't transfer any file larger than SIZE Paul -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6251] security: rsync executes remote commands

2009-04-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6251 way...@samba.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: Rsync Runs Out of Space Because of Temp File

2009-04-08 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 08 Apr 2009, philvh wrote: I have 2 mounted drive. Each have 60 GB. On each drive, there is a 50 GB file (it's a virtual machine) and nothing else. When I sync one with another, there should not be a problem, because there are 10 GB left, and also, shouldn't it re-use the space of

Re: Rsync Runs Out of Space Because of Temp File

2009-04-08 Thread philvh
Thanks Paul for helping. I wonder if this method would help what you described: 1) Create a diff before the update. So in place update is always the case. 2) The diff does not have data, but rather information where in the destination needs to be updated. There are still problem to work out