[rsync-announce] Rsync 3.0.6 released

2009-05-08 Thread Wayne Davison
I have released rsync 3.0.6. This is another bug-fix release. To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.5, visit this link: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.6-NEWS You can download the source tar file and its signature from here:

Re: %h %a %u string in --log-file-format doesn't work

2009-05-08 Thread Jignesh Shah
Ohhh,,..Thanks Wayne...Got it.. Thanks, Jignesh On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Wayne Davison way...@samba.org wrote: On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:42:28PM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: It does't include the host name, IP address and authenticated user name and instead it keep it as %h %a %u.

Re: Needs suggestion in using --relative with /./ feature in rsync 3.0.5

2009-05-08 Thread Jignesh Shah
Thats great !!! Thanks Wayne for you great reply. could you please also help me to remove my fear in upgrading rsync 3.0.5. We have been planning to upgrad rsync 3.0.5. I have some question on this so that we will not screwed up the file systems. We have been using rsync 2.6.7 since long and we

Rsync 3.0.6 released

2009-05-08 Thread Wayne Davison
I have released rsync 3.0.6. This is another bug-fix release. To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.5, visit this link: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.6-NEWS You can download the source tar file and its signature from here:

Re: Going to upgrad rsync V2.6.7 to V3.0.5

2009-05-08 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 04:50:40PM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: I am wondering if we upgrade rsync 3.0.5 then will it cause any unexpected behaviour then rsync 2.6.7? Probably not, but not knowing how you rsync rsync, one can't say for sure. You can read through the various news files, looking

Re: Problem with --fil

2009-05-08 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 11:41 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote: On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 03:46:38PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: The only thing I see different between rsync 2.6.7 and 3.0.5 is that 3.0.5 puts thousand separators in the numbers: That's a 3.1.0dev feature, not 3.0.5. You're right.

[SCM] The rsync repository. branch, b3.0.x, updated. v3.0.6pre1-6-g6622816

2009-05-08 Thread rsync-cvs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project The rsync repository.. The branch, b3.0.x has been updated via 6622816efff2d6634ac5e1e4b45d9f23dffbf03f (commit) from

[SCM] The rsync repository. annotated tag, v3.0.6, created. v3.0.6

2009-05-08 Thread rsync-cvs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project The rsync repository.. The annotated tag, v3.0.6 has been created at 02ae08eea6ef185ae52c347a69048bbc360b23cd (tag) tagging

CVS update: rsyncweb

2009-05-08 Thread rsync-cvs
Date: Fri May 8 18:10:10 2009 Author: wayned Update of /data/cvs/rsyncweb In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv15547 Modified Files: index.html Log Message: Announce 3.0.6. Revisions: index.html 1.111 = 1.112

[SCM] The rsync repository. branch, master, updated. v3.0.3-192-g8f73c8a

2009-05-08 Thread rsync-cvs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project The rsync repository.. The branch, master has been updated via 8f73c8a4985ced1aabadf0feed4755abf8b008cd (commit) from