does --whole-file always work?

2009-05-14 Thread Amir Rapson
Hi, Running rsync with --whole-file yields poorer performance results than a simple cp. Looking at the code - it looks like copy_file isn't really called when I add the --whole-file flag. The regular receive_data is doing the copy. Anyone encountered this? No other special flags (rsync

Re: does --whole-file always work?

2009-05-14 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 15:59 +0300, Amir Rapson wrote: Running rsync with --whole-file yields poorer performance results than a simple cp. Looking at the code - it looks like copy_file isn't really called when I add the --whole-file flag. The regular receive_data is doing the copy. That's

Re: patches to enable rsync 3.0.6 compile on AIX 3.2

2009-05-14 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:26:32PM -0400, Ian! D. Allen wrote: These two small changes enable 3.0.6 to compile and link on AIX 3.2: #if defined(ENOTSUP) [...] #else errno = EINVAL; I think using ENOSYS would be better than EINVAL there. Does that work? BTW, using -u with diff

rsync to SAMBA mount or NTFS tutorial?

2009-05-14 Thread Dale E. Moore
Will someone please tell me where to go, and how to get there to get rsync running to mounted windows shares or mounted NTFS volumes? I'm doing OK with rsync-ing to EXT3 mounted volumes but the others still perplex me. I look forward to hearing from you, Dale -- Please use reply-all for most

rsync 3.0.6 ACLs under MacOS 10.4

2009-05-14 Thread gigagigosu
Have a functional rsync 3.0.6 server but am having troubles preserving permissions from source to destination. On server, rsyncd.conf looks like this (modules are defined but not listed below): cat /etc/rsyncd.conf secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets read only = no list = yes uid = root gid =

RE: rsync to SAMBA mount or NTFS tutorial?

2009-05-14 Thread Tony Abernethy
There are three areas of fundamental incompatibility (that I am aware of) Basic File Permissions: Unix has rwx for owner/group/world, Windows has Hidden/System/Read-Only/Archive. NTFS has ACLs (The above is an oversimplification, and things can be done so it works well enough for what is

Re: rsync 3.0.6 ACLs under MacOS 10.4

2009-05-14 Thread David C. Miller
to preserve Mac OS X ACL's and extended attributes you have to be rsyncing to another Mac or at least a volume formatted with HFS+. If your rsync server is not a Mac and the HFS+ partition does not have ACL's turned on then the ACL's and extended attributes won't be copied. David. -

Re: rsync 3.0.6 ACLs under MacOS 10.4

2009-05-14 Thread gigagigosu
sorry, i forgot to mention that both client and server are running MacOS 10.4 (client is 10.4.8 and server is 10.4.11) and both source and destination are HFS+ Journaled, both machines are G5 PowerPC xserves. Partition scheme on both source volume and destination volume is Apple Partition Map.

[SCM] The rsync repository. branch, master, updated. v3.0.3-194-g134f97c

2009-05-14 Thread rsync-cvs
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project The rsync repository.. The branch, master has been updated via 134f97c9cc42560b888c4bbdaeab4cc338978832 (commit) via