Hi,
I am using rsync 3.0.4 on a WinXP machine (with CygWin) to synchronize my
files to a RedHat Linux server. Everything is working perfectly, but there
is one thing I do not understand.
Apparently there is a difference in pushing and pulling files with rsync.
When I push my files to the server
Hello,
I have very-large file to transfer 10 GB and I have problems to transfer it
if connection drops often.
When I don't use --partial option, It will compare file with version on
server and transfer difference but what if it only comes to 99% and
connection drops. I will lost that 99% part
I'm not sure (maybe someone else can confirm/infirm?) but I think when
there is a server it is normal that there is one process to handle
connexions and one process for each transfer.
Think about many clients connecting to your server. One process will
dialog with all clients (from different
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 12:22 +0200, Jan Alphenaar wrote:
Apparently there is a difference in pushing and pulling files with rsync.
When I push my files to the server with this command, I see one rsync
process on my WinXP machine, just as expected
But when I pull my files from the server to my
Ante Blaskovic (anbla...@globalnet.hr) wrote on 1 June 2009 12:31:
I have very-large file to transfer 10 GB and I have problems to transfer it
if connection drops often.
When I don't use --partial option, It will compare file with version on
server and transfer difference but what if it only
Matt McCutchen (m...@mattmccutchen.net) wrote on 31 May 2009 23:11:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 07:10 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 14:34 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
And one more thing here:
If you are going to prepare this batch file, it seems there will be
double the
--partial --partial-dir=.rsync-tmp
Carlos, thank you very much for solution.
Regards,
Ante
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 10:15:27AM -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
In this case rsync automatically uses --whole-file. Will it do the
same in the case of --only-write-batch?
The default is always --no-whole-file when writing a batch.
..wayne..
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:04:59PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
How can I access the rsync maintained patches repository with the git
tools?
Sorry for forgetting to get that taken care of. The issue turned out to
be that the samba site defaults to not allowing git: exports unless
specifically
listserv.traffic wrote:
Only copying changed files is *exactly* what ROBOCOPY is designed for.
This is even the default behavior. It uses
filename+size+modification_time to determine if two files are the
same. ROBOCOPY also has an enromous number of logging options.
This discussion is
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:33 PM, listserv.traf...@sloop.net wrote:
Only copying changed files is *exactly* what ROBOCOPY is designed for.
This is even the default behavior. It uses
filename+size+modification_time to determine if two files are the
same. ROBOCOPY also has an enromous number of
Date: Mon Jun 1 15:59:34 2009
Author: wayned
Update of /data/cvs/rsyncweb
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv4097
Modified Files:
download.html
Log Message:
Updated to reference rsync-patches.git repo.
Revisions:
download.html 1.30 = 1.31
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project The rsync repository..
The branch, master has been updated
via 63070274f24d4c018bcfaeddfedd3b8b6b3d40ca (commit)
from
13 matches
Mail list logo
