On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.netwrote:
I'm guessing the uid = 0 and gid = 0 in the test daemon
configuration were disabled so that the daemon tests could run for
unprivileged users.
Right. I've checked in a fix that ensures that uid gid are specified
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6881
way...@samba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5583
henrik-rs...@prak.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||henrik-rs...@prak.org
---
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:38:48 -0500
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 18:20 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
Am Montag, 9. November 2009 17:48:35 schrieb Matt McCutchen:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:43 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
does anybody know what's
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.netwrote:
The best approach for now is probably to backport the --delete-missing-args
changes to 3.0.6.
In the future, I'd suggest starting with the head of the b3.0.x branch.
That currently gets you one extra commit, an
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Philip Pokorny
ppoko...@penguincomputing.com wrote:
How confident are you in the current state of 3.1.0.pre and the nightly
snapshots? Should I be concerned about running this on production data?
Personally, I'm almost ready to start using it in production.
, there is the large area of media files.
Example:
For my photo collections it would speed things up in the case where I
move pictures to a different directory, rename them from DSC_01234.JPG to
20091113-174354_dsc01234.jpg (extracted timestamp from exif data) and
add author, license and some keywords
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:43 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Matt McCutchen
m...@mattmccutchen.net wrote:
The best approach for now is probably to backport the
--delete-missing-args changes to 3.0.6.
In the future, I'd suggest starting with the
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:38 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Philip Pokorny
ppoko...@penguincomputing.com wrote:
How confident are you in the current state of 3.1.0.pre and
the nightly snapshots? Should I be concerned about running
this on
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 12:36 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:38:48 -0500
Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 18:20 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote:
I want to check if the following is possible:
1. transport a big block of data
Wayne,
Transferring an 8gb file using rsync between a network (10GbE) mounted
filesystem and local disk.
rsync-2.6.9 - 88-95 MB/sec
rsync-3.0.6 - 62-72 MB/sec
rsync-3.1.0 - 86-90 MB/sec
Doing a cp of the file yields 140-160MB/sec.
It appears the IO code improvements in 3.1 have definitely
Hi,
At http://www.alanbonnici.com/videos/cwrsync.asp I have created a video
tutorial on how to install and configure rsync running on a windows
platform.
It is a works-in-progress document. If you have any corrections or comments
please email me.
Regards,
Alan Bonnici
--
Please use reply-all
Has anyone compiled rsync with other newer compilers like Intel 11.1? Does
this break anything?
My quick test shows rsync-3.1.0 performance jumps to ~120MB/sec.
Greg
On Nov 13, 2009, at 10:44 AM, Greg Siekas wrote:
Wayne,
Transferring an 8gb file using rsync between a network
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project The rsync repository..
The branch, master has been updated
via ce795fcd75dfa6e495e148d7c219c09aa6484d74 (commit)
from
14 matches
Mail list logo
