I'm using rsync 3.0.6 between two solaris 8/10 hosts an I frequently get
multiplexing overflow errors:
log/20091123_223901/dresden.log:multiplexing overflow 101:7104843 [sender]
log/20091123_223901/frankfurt.log:multiplexing overflow 101:7104843 [sender]
I'm trying to set up a full server backup using rsync 3.0.6. I'm using
--fake-super, and SSH keys to access a remote server as a normal user.
My problem is that there is a local directory that has permissions 0111
(d--x--x--x), and rsync throws an error trying to set the xattr:
rsync: failed to
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Dieter Stüken d.stue...@conterra.dewrote:
log/20091123_223901/dresden.log:multiplexing overflow 101:7104843
[sender]
This has come up before. That number translates into the byte sequence 0x4b
0x69 0x6c 0x6c, which is Kill in ASCII. So, something is
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 10:56 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Dieter Stüken d.stue...@conterra.de
wrote:
log/20091123_223901/dresden.log:multiplexing overflow
101:7104843 [sender]
This has come up before. That number translates into the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6936
Summary: rsync silently fails to preserve uid/gid of -1
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Hello rsyncers!
PRACTICAL CIRCUMSTANCES:
Backup1 shall be identical to Original. My traditional custom. NO HELP
NEEDED for this.
Backup2 shall only be a subset of the original, only files with a
certain maximum size and filename/suffix pattern get included. For
this I use rsync's filename
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4378
m...@mattmccutchen.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Don't delete file types that|Don't delete files that
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4378
--- Comment #4 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-27 20:34 CST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I notice that the patch only affects extraneous special files immediately
inside file-list directories, not those in extraneous directories.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4378
--- Comment #5 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-27 20:36 CST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
The goal of this ticket is really to make --min-size/--max-size behave more
like an ordinary exclude.
Whoops, the ticket was originally
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 00:06 +0100, Stefan Nowak wrote:
Is there a possibility, so that --max-size AFFECTS --delete actually?
Situation where it makes sense: Imagine that I had the rule --max-
size=1M and my backup-storage is satisfying. But one day it ain't
enough anymore, and I decide to
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5795
--- Comment #5 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-27 20:45 CST ---
This is fixed in the current development rsync, right? When it gets an error
writing to the socket, it continues to read for messages from the other side.
--
Hi!
On 2009-11-28 at 03:43 +0100 Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 00:06 +0100, Stefan Nowak wrote:
Is there a possibility, so that --max-size AFFECTS --delete actually?
Situation where it makes sense: Imagine that I had the rule --max-
size=1M and my backup-storage is satisfying.
Manpage of rsync 3.0.6 about option --update: [...] This forces rsync
to skip any files which exist on the destination and have a modified
time that is newer than the source file. [...]
Here the manpage is very clear to me!
But if I don't use that option: Would rsync overwrite newer files at
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 05:15 +0100, Stefan Nowak wrote:
On 2009-11-28 at 03:43 +0100 Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 00:06 +0100, Stefan Nowak wrote:
The content of this newsgroup post, makes me think, that in earlier
versions --max-size may have once AFFECTED --delete:
On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 05:30 +0100, Stefan Nowak wrote:
Manpage of rsync 3.0.6 about option --update: [...] This forces rsync
to skip any files which exist on the destination and have a modified
time that is newer than the source file. [...]
Here the manpage is very clear to me!
But if I
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6928
--- Comment #1 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-27 22:51 CST ---
I would be disinclined to add this to the main version of rsync. Rsync
generally doesn't devote effort to second-guessing the user. Not reading the
man page is not a
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:09 +, Mark Young wrote:
I believe the rdiff man page is still not correct, even with your
submitted changes. It states In every case where a filename must be
specified, - may be used instead to mean either standard input or
standard output as appropriate..
I've
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6916
--- Comment #2 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-27 23:57 CST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
The only thing for rsync to potentially do is to have a build option for using
a compatible, shared zlib.
What happened to, Tridge has
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6927
--- Comment #2 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-28 00:20 CST ---
This could probably be implemented as a popt alias rather than in the rsync
program itself. Some specific comments:
(In reply to comment #0)
* Maybe it should also
19 matches
Mail list logo
