On 04/16/2010 02:16 AM, George Sullivan wrote:
Hello everybody!
First my setup:
I connect from Debian Lenny to Ubuntu Karmic with a command like:
us...@localserver:$ rsync -rtcve ssh us...@remoteserver:/.../ /local/.../
(using default versions of ssh and rsync in the vendor repos,
ssh with
Am 4/16/2010 10:37 AM, schrieb Leen Besselink:
On 04/16/2010 02:16 AM, George Sullivan wrote:
Hello everybody!
snip
Hello George,
I'm no regular rsync-developer, but I like you paranoia so I'll answer
with what I know.
I'll start with 2 general tips:
1. if you want to know if a system
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 02:16 +0200, George Sullivan wrote:
us...@localserver:$ rsync -rtcve ssh us...@remoteserver:/.../ /local/.../
But what I'm interested in is what happens if remoteserver
is compromised?
Could attacker X on
remoteserver alter the rsync binary in such a way so it can
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 17:41 -0700, Mohammed AlQuraishi wrote:
I have a situation where the files I'm backing up are written to every
fifteen minutes or so. There's a good possibility that rsync will try
to copy a file while it is being written into, and I'm wondering if
there's any risk that
On Fri 16 Apr 2010, Matt McCutchen wrote:
Additionally, would the writing program be blocked from writing to the
file if rsync is reading the file?
Not on unix-like systems. OTOH, I believe Windows enforces read/write
locking, so rsync could not have the file open for reading at the same
Hi All,
I was hoping someone could help me figure out what['s going on here...
I have a server that I'm using to backup a lot of files to, and I'm
using rsync to back them up.
The backup server runs CentOS 5.4 Linux:
# uname -a
Linux slurp.kilokluster.ucsc.edu 2.6.18-164.15.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed
On Fri 16 Apr 2010, Erich Weiler wrote:
As you can see, both sender and receiver are version 3.0.5. I read
the docs and it seems to indicate that by default there is no
timeout...? So the error messages are confusing
I've found that it can help to actually configure a timeout;
use the
Thanks! I'll give it a shot...
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Fri 16 Apr 2010, Erich Weiler wrote:
As you can see, both sender and receiver are version 3.0.5. I read
the docs and it seems to indicate that by default there is no
timeout...? So the error messages are confusing
I've found that
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7368
Summary: Support --link-dest when receiving from a old version
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.7
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7368
--- Comment #1 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2010-04-16 17:16 CST ---
--link-dest support was added in rsync 2.5.6, so it should work when talking to
rsync 2.6.3. Please post the exact error output you get.
--
Configure bugmail:
On 4/16/2010 4:30 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 02:16 +0200, George Sullivan wrote:
us...@localserver:$ rsync -rtcve ssh us...@remoteserver:/.../ /local/.../
The remote server can change arbitrary files on the local server by
sending a symlink and then using paths that go
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 02:17 +0200, g. sullivan wrote:
On 4/16/2010 4:30 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 02:16 +0200, George Sullivan wrote:
us...@localserver:$ rsync -rtcve ssh us...@remoteserver:/.../ /local/.../
The remote server can change arbitrary files on the local
12 matches
Mail list logo
