-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
That is exactly what I was thinking too. If that isn't working we need
to know more about what you are trying to accomplish, why, and what it
isn't doing.
On 06/18/11 11:05, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 14:31 +0200, Andre Majorel wro
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 16:26 -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
> What I don't understand is why people say they don't know why you'd want
> to do that without knowing any of your context.
The statement is true, is it not? Claiming that no one would ever want
to do it would be different.
--
Matt
--
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7109
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
On 6/18/2011 8:31 AM, Andre Majorel wrote:
Is there a way to make rsync unconditionally transfer files,
i.e. create them anew even if the target already exists and is
identical to the source ?
rsync -I looks closer but still avoids transferring the files.
-IW
What I don't understand is why p
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8201
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7765
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|3.0.7
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7691
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|3.0.6
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7110
--- Comment #1 from Matt McCutchen 2011-06-18 19:01:59
UTC ---
Specifically, I propose that the code in xattrs.c that swallows EPERM for
symlinks be removed as explained in bug 7109 comment 4.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/user
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7109
Matt McCutchen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8138
--- Comment #2 from Matt McCutchen 2011-06-18 18:48:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> A fix on the sending side would require that the curr_dir path be noticed to
> be
> different, and a full pop of all filters be done, followed by a full push
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7109
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8138
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8201
Matt McCutchen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Wayne Davison
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8201
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|3.0.8
On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 14:31 +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> Is there a way to make rsync unconditionally transfer files,
> i.e. create them anew even if the target already exists and is
> identical to the source ?
>
> rsync -I looks closer but still avoids transferring the files.
Maybe "rsync -I --
The advantage of rsync is that it saves tons of bandwidth by sending only
the changes.
For your use case, why not just use "scp -r" instead of rsync?
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Andre Majorel wrote:
> Is there a way to make rsync unconditionally transfer files,
> i.e. create them anew eve
Is there a way to make rsync unconditionally transfer files,
i.e. create them anew even if the target already exists and is
identical to the source ?
rsync -I looks closer but still avoids transferring the files.
--
André Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/
--
Please use reply-all for most
19 matches
Mail list logo
