On Thu 20 Dec 2012, Ryan John wrote:
> On Thu 20 Dec 2012, Ryan John wrote:
> >>
> >> The umask would be preferable to using --chmod. Is that possible?
>
> > Don't you just want to use -a instead of -r in your options to rsync?
> > That will include -p that will preserve permissions from the sou
From: Paul Slootman [paul+rs...@wurtel.net]
Sent: Thursday, 20 December 2012 12:40 PM
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Cc: Ryan John
Subject: Re: rsync without POSIX ACLs
On Thu 20 Dec 2012, Ryan John wrote:
>>
>> The umask would be preferable to using --chmod.
On Wed 19 Dec 2012, VanL wrote:
> I have a question about what happens at the code level when I use
> --whole-file. I know that it turns off the rolling checksum. I also
> understand that it only checks the file's mtime and size to identify
> whether there should be some transfer. Two questions:
>
On Thu 20 Dec 2012, Ryan John wrote:
>
> The umask would be preferable to using --chmod. Is that possible?
Don't you just want to use -a instead of -r in your options to rsync?
That will include -p that will preserve permissions from the source.
Paul
--
Please use reply-all for most replies t
