On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 4:48 PM, <
dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba@gmail.com> wrote:
> That doesn't make sense. Both the source and destination path contains
> simple alphanumeric characters, no more no less. Why would it matter
> whether the path is /abc/ or /def/ or even /123/?
Hmm.. I
6 user user 0 2016-01-24 22:57:53.0 -0500 3/foo
1321176 -rw-r--r-- 6 user user 0 2016-01-24 22:57:53.0 -0500 4/bar
1321176 -rw-r--r-- 6 user user 0 2016-01-24 22:57:53.0 -0500 4/foo
23:00:38 ~/T$ ~/rsync-HEAD-20160124-1917GMT/rsync -aviH --link-dest ../2/ 1/ 5/
sending i
Hi Martin,
2016-01-23 18:41 GMT+01:00 Martin Pool :
> It seems like yajsync is a reimplementation of rsync's protocol by looking
> at the GPL'd C rsync source, but it doesn't actually include any code from
> rsync. Is that right?
Yes correct, it is a complete rewrite in
Hi Andrey,
2016-01-23 4:02 GMT+01:00 Andrey Gursky :
...
> If they don't want to bother with just discussing, why would they take a
> big effort to claim? And your proposition for LGPL is not very
> different in opposite to BSD or public domain.
Yes, I agree. The risk of
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11692
Bug ID: 11692
Summary: Update config.guess and config.sub
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
On 2016-01-24 03:51, Kevin Korb wrote:
Are you rsyncing from one to the other? Both of them to somewhere
else? One at a time to somewhere else? Why won't you just show your
actual command line and an ls -li of the correct source and incorrect
target?
Are you trolling me? All the
The branch, master has been updated
via 839dbff Add support for comparing nanoseconds on the receiver.
via f6f5ea4 Prepare the repository for more development.
from 9a37d9c Fix a tweak that should have been untweaked.
https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:29 PM, <
dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2016-01-24 03:51, Kevin Korb wrote:
>
>> Are you rsyncing from one to the other? Both of them to somewhere
>> else? One at a time to somewhere else? Why won't you just show your
>> actual command line
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
>
>
> >
> > > I guess I could write an initial protocol specification - but it would
> > > not be complete and I wouldn't be able to relicense my library to
> > > LGPL anyway.
> > >
> > > So I guess I have convinced myself that it is not worth the effort
> > > trying. Time is probably better spent
On 2016-01-24 20:39, Selva Nair wrote:
Sorry for butting in, but hope this helps:
The command line you posted earlier reads
% rsync -HzvhErlptgoDW --stats --progress --out-format="%t %f %b"
/source/ /destination/
I think Kevin is asking you write out that /source/ and /destination
exactly
[Included text copied from the commit.]
> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:52:49 +
> From: samba-b...@samba.org
> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11521
> Wayne Davison changed:
>What|Removed
2016-01-24 18:53 GMT+01:00 Martin Pool :
...
>> You might be right but I am a bit hesitant.
>>
>>
>> http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/58338/when-porting-code-must-i-follow-the-original-license
>>
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo