Re: rsync: "-c" option clarification

2017-05-19 Thread Kevin Korb via rsync
inline... On 05/19/2017 06:07 PM, steven banville wrote: > > Hi > > This is a very delayed response but thanks very much for your answer, it is > appreciated. > > It seems that if you do an rsync a second / subsequent time with the "-c" > (--checksum), say for data that has not changed, it wo

RE: rsync: "-c" option clarification

2017-05-19 Thread steven banville via rsync
Hi This is a very delayed response but thanks very much for your answer, it is appreciated. It seems that if you do an rsync a second / subsequent time with the "-c" (--checksum), say for data that has not changed, it would have to generate checksums from the files on disk at both ends, even

[Bug 12769] error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) depending on source file system

2017-05-19 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769 --- Comment #2 from Roland Haberkorn --- I did some further investigation... First thing to add: The ext4 file systems are hard-linked differential rsync backups of the real data on XFS. I changed the testcase by deleting the --link-dest option. W