.
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Dag Wieers wrote:
I'm having a problem rsyncing one file (since I signed it). It seems that
the content of a file is able to cause problems in the protocol.
building file list ...
28820 files to consider
apt/packages/avifile/
apt/packages
regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
.
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Steve Bonds wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:39:19 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers dag-at-wieers.com wrote:
There are other ways to work around it, either by uploading in different
steps (which is impractical in my scenario) or by using a staging area
(which is impossible
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:39:19PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
With newer rsyncs, rsync seems to sort the transaction set, so I
cannot longer use this trick to have the metadata uploaded just after
the data in the same transaction set.
Rsync has
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:51:23AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
In the past I could say smt. like:
rsync -a dir1/ dir2/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/remote-dir/
and it would process first dir1 and then dir2.
The filenames read in from dir1 and dir2
like --near-atomic or something else
abstract (that is explained in the manual), instead of some action that
may be mis-interpreted.
But I'm more interested to know if something like this is acceptable to
get included or not. Not this patch specifically, but the same
functionality.
-- dag
, synced again and
it miraculously worked.
I'm not sure why it gives this weird error when the *sender* has a full
partition but apparantly it did.
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power
--
update put into partial-dir (will try again).
unexpected tag -111
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(692)
Can this be caused by the delay-renames patch ?
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Dag Wieers wrote:
Hi Wayne, Jeff,
With the same version/build as the last report, I got this error now:
...
extra/state/all-packages.list
145 100% 46.83kB/s0:00:30 (634, 0.0% of 201605)
WARNING: fedora/1/en/i386/base
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 07:51:33PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
unexpected tag -111
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(692)
Can this be caused by the delay-renames patch ?
I tested how the code handles
more than that option to work (if both sides understand it).
Is there a policy about what can go in the next rsync release or when
something gets included in CVS ?
Thanks for --delay-renames :)
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind
a fix for this so I can verify this ? Is
CVS in proper shape currently ?
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:15:18PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
But there seems to be something wrong with the --fuzzy option
Yes -- it's a bug in the change I just checked into generator.c to deal
with the dirname-pointers change. I've just checked
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 10:15:18PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
And the --fuzzy option was my main reason to try out the newer rsync.
One other caveat -- the CVS version of rsync has a protocol change in it
that makes it incompatible with 2.6.4 pre1
/s0:00:00 (798, 99.9% of 244497)
Invalid packet at end of run [sender]
rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at main.c(451)
The rsync run completed without errors apart from that message.
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
Invalid packet at end of run [sender]
It would help to know what options you had enabled.
Damn, I was planning to include those. Here they are:
-avHl --progress --delete-after
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
Invalid packet at end of run [sender]
It would help to know what options you had enabled.
An update. I noticed that the files being transfered or not updated at the
end of the run
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
Invalid packet at end of run [sender]
It would help to know what options you had enabled.
An update. I noticed that the files being
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
Invalid packet at end of run [sender]
OK, this was a combination of --delay-updates and --hard-links that was
causing a problem at the end of the run. I've checked in a fix to CVS
Hi,
I'm not sure what the policy of this list is and I bet everyone has a spam
filter, so nobody might have noticed, but we got spammed.
Can anyone send mail to the list or do you have to subscribe first ?
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 06:24:15PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
Would a current CVS checkout have a fix for this so I can verify this ?
Is CVS in proper shape currently ?
Yes, the CVS version (as well as the latest nightly tar file) is in
good
.
This would make a good FAQ. The multiple solutions (and applications) are
not that obvious to new users.
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 32768 bytes: phase unknown
[sender]: Broken pipe (32)
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (796308 bytes received so far)
[sender]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(434)
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL
implementation and python-inotify.
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http
to repeat the same set
of commands on the commandline).
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read
the OS or the package). :)
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, C.Jagadish wrote:
Dear Mr. Samir,
We are using RedHat 7.2. We are getting same error as reported by you some
time back (given below).
Did you get any solution?
You may want to update your rsync version to something
(e.g. cygwin).
That seems to be your problem. So upgrading to 2.6.7 will most likely fix
this for you.
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https
with acl support is not appropriate as
a drop-in replacement for the 'normal' rsync ?
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman
and testing) it could be included, if at all.
Thanks !
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http
and receiver
for both push and pull ? That would be required to dismiss the network
configuration/environment as the possible cause.
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
--
To unsubscribe
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Srinivasa Battula wrote:
On Wed, 32 Aug 2006, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Srinivasa Battula wrote:
It has been observed that rsync push mode is much slower when compared
to pull (On Identical scenarios). Building/receiving file list takes
almost
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, wwp wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:50:39 +0200 (CEST) Dag Wieers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Srinivasa Battula wrote:
On Wed, 32 Aug 2006, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Srinivasa Battula wrote:
It has been observed that rsync
some script that needs local customizations.
Thanks in advance,
--
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 11:43 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
Looking for an easy way to prevent a repetitive rsync to be running
multiple times, I was wondering if it could be useful to have an option
like:
--pidfile /some/path/rsync-mirror-org.pid
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 11:43 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
Looking for an easy way to prevent a repetitive rsync to be running
multiple times, I was wondering if it could be useful to have an option
like
prefer not to
juggle with numbers here). Please test yourself and report back.
Kind regards,
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]diff --git a/options.c
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Brian K. White wrote:
On 2/14/2013 9:50 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Since a --direct-io feature was requested a few times the past decade
with little response and the actual patch is quite trivial, I patched
both v3.0.9 and master branch and included the patches here.
When
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Linda Walsh wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Brian K. White wrote:
On 2/14/2013 9:50 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Since a --direct-io feature was requested a few times the past decade
with little response and the actual patch is quite trivial, I
from iozone wrt. alignment and portability)
Another solution is fadvise(), although I still had the behavior mentioned
above using --drop-cache, so it didn't fix my use-case which is why I
wrote this patch.
Kind regards,
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux
is not
implemented.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/
-- dagit linux solutions, i...@dagit.net, http://dagit.net/
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change
43 matches
Mail list logo
