Sounds pretty useful. I think perhaps it would be better at the -vv level
though.
- Dave
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:23:21PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
I think we should make rsync say something like this when -v is
specified:
rsync: Attempting connection using ssh -v samba.org rsync
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 03:41:36PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 11:05:15AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 04:37:53PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 17 Jan 2002, Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you get a chance, could you please look
is happening, including file names. If you can narrow it down to a simple
example that somebody else could follow to reproduce the problem, that
would be the best.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 10:52:21AM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
I'm responding to my own mail. I'm adding some extra
'*' --delete-excluded . user@host:/dir/
but that will delete all files except the i_* files in host:/dir/.
- Dave Dykstra
the single block that has been changed and
copy the rest from the file it already has.
- Dave Dykstra
It looks like Martin just put this fix into CVS because he turned on -Wall
on gcc and noticed a warning message.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 09:34:27PM -0600, John Malmberg wrote:
Probably, but that just means that there was an addtional bug in the
original code.
At this phase
for these
options, and a lot more documentation written for the man page.
- Dave Dykstra
instead.
- Dave Dykstra
it wasn't allowed to. But I'm not certain if
thats the correct translation.
I don't think that message is coming from rsync. The strings rresvport
and Error reading don't occur anywhere in the source code.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 01:38:10PM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 03:20:18PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:01:31AM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
[I wish the list archives were searchable, this most likely is a repeat
question]
You can
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 02:03:04PM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
No, I really don't see how it would be possible for rsync to print that
error. I also see no occurrences of the string bind: or bytes :.
I agree that it's not rsync source thats causing the problem, but something in
the
somehow; I convert them to IP address
strings and then compare them. Does anybody have a better way?
- Dave Dykstra
--- socket.c.O Fri Jan 11 14:21:10 2002
+++ socket.cFri Jan 11 14:25:50 2002
@@ -598,6 +598,8 @@
int length = sizeof(ss);
static char name_buf[100
'/#notes#'.
- Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:57:03AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:34:23PM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
What is the necessary syntax to exclude a file named #notes# from an
action?
I've tried these without success:
#*
#*
#notes#
#notes#
\#notes
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:51:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
# cd /usr/local/bin
# rsync -a --rsync-path=/usr/local/bin/ /tmp/ sclback:/tmp/
UX:sh (sh): ERROR: /usr/local/bin/: cannot execute
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync
Wow, that's a new one. It's quite surprising that that would cause the
symptoms you described, but I think I can imagine how. The remote end
would ignore the -e ssh, but it's possible that the -ax could result in
different information being passed back and forth after the large file is
sent if
.
What does the output of the script look like? Usually cron mails the
results to the root login. Most likely you've got an SSH authentication
problem.
- Dave Dykstra
://rsync.samba.org/rsyncftp/binaries/
- Dave Dykstra
network, and the exact
command you're using.
- Dave Dykstra
to you, or to the
mailing list?
The list.
- Dave Dykstra
at it it would be appreciated.
- Dave Dykstra
scratch, that demonstrates the problem you're seeing?
- Dave Dykstra
?
It should. In general rsync always does all it's work in a temporary file
and only does a rename when it's all done so it never really completely loses
a file.
- Dave Dykstra
tcp wrappers.
- Dave Dykstra
that the procedure accepts to allow passing a
value through?
This works very well when all of the #undef lines are in a standard
format.
-John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal Opinion Only
- Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 09:58:40AM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 04:45:52PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
Does running rsync in daemon mode on the remote host preclude the need
to use SSH from the client? If so, how secure is this versus using rsync
in non daemon mode
Looks like nobody has answered this yet.
I haven't tested it or looked at the code, but according to my reading of
the rsyncd.conf man page, that's not a supported syntax for hosts allow.
If you specify a /netmask, the first portion has to be an IP address and
not a hostname.
- Dave Dykstra
.
- Dave Dykstra
cygwin on both sides? I
would have thought that would result in matching timestamps granularity on
both sides so rsync would always end up comparing the same values.
- Dave Dykstra
), and that can get very tricky so if possible just
make one the master. You don't want -z if you're going over a LAN, only
if it's relatively slow link.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 11:18:12AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
Subject: Re: CVS update: rsync
On 14 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified Files:
options.c
Log Message:
When INET6 is not defined, meaning that IPv6 is not supported, need to
initalize the global_opts.af_hint
nobody has quite your configuration. There are a lot of
machines that are set up to automatically build the latest rsync sources
every day, but I don't see your exact type listed. See http://build.samba.org.
- Dave Dykstra
than just using global
variables. I went ahead and submitted a patch to CVS to do it that way,
but I don't see any advantage to putting global options into a global_opts
structure and I recommend that we move back to global variables.
- Dave Dykstra
.
This really is a minor point because as Martin pointed out, the fact that
rsync's pipelining would be defeated means that the idea would have a
drastic effect on throughput.
- Dave Dykstra
but rsync does
not currently have any user interface to change the compress level, sorry.
Maybe if somebody submitted a nice clean patch Martin would take it.
- Dave Dykstra
(code 12) at io.c(151) when accessing the server from
itself (client version 2.5.0 too).
2.5.0 has a big problem with --daemon which is fixed in all the 2.5.1pre*
versions under the preview directory on the download site.
- Dave Dykstra
?
Please, not another runtime switch.
- Dave Dykstra
on by default in 2.5.0. You can disable with
configure --disable-debug. The DEBUG define will not be turned on in 2.5.1.
- Dave Dykstra
sure about that, I think people have complained that it isn't
very good at passing error codes back.
- Dave Dykstra
? That
would give you more flexibility to split things up however you
like.
2. Perhaps you could break it up into ~70 copies, where each time you
give it the first directory that contains the data and another
one that contains one of the hardlinks.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 12:19:39PM +1100, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:00:05AM -0600, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:05:44AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
| On 7 Dec 2001, Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Please don't take
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:18:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Dykstra schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:44:26PM -0600:
* I have to copy a structure of 70 directories where the data of these
* directories are hardlinked to the data of the 1st directory. Within this
* orig data
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:05:44AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 7 Dec 2001, Cameron Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't take this path - ownerships on symlinks are a pretty
meaningless concept
...
Why _not_ take the conservation approach unless somebody reports a
problem
in the 2.5.0 release. My guess is these
bit length overflows were always happening but nobody noticed it because
the DEBUG mode wasn't turned on.
Martin, I don't think --enable-debug should define #DEBUG, I think it should
only generate debugging symbols.
- Dave Dykstra
chgrp
(but not chmod). Only SystemV messed up when they added symlinks, and as
a result had to come up with lchown.
- Dave Dykstra
archive bit, it must be something in
Netware that I've never heard of, and please explain what it is.
- Dave Dykstra
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 04:14:15PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
On 27 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can reproduce it, and I think you've stumbled on a significant bug. The
problem is that rsync always assumes stat variable st_rdev, which
contains both the major and minor
/chown distinction, so I don't think it's something
to worry about.
- Dave Dykstra
() in receiver.c. I note that
on that special call, the f_out parameter is set to -1 so the following
little patch fixes it.
I think this is simple enough that I'll just submit it to the rsync CVS as
one of the small changes I put in.
- Dave Dykstra
--- generator.c.O Mon Dec 3 12:29:31
in labeled groups, however.
That's a possibility, although I can't think of any nice logical grouping
off the top of my head.
- Dave Dykstra
, and the only groups it will allow a non-privileged
user to chgrp to are those which groups which the user belongs to.
- Dave Dykstra
On 4 Sep 2001 21:24:33 +1000, Martin Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 Aug 2001, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin,
I want to remind you that there's still an open issue regarding copies when
both source and destination are on the local machine (including over NFS
know what happened. I see that gcc warns when you use mktemp:
the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
so somebody person must have thought they could just replace one with the
other without looking at the man page.
- Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 03:18:16PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right. the order dependency actually lets you create very complex
include/exclude rules. for each item, each --include and --exclude is
evaluated in commandline order, until the item has either passed all the
of the files on both sides (that is, only a
stat()) and if they match it will not do anything else.
- Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 11:46:30PM +0100, Rok Krulec wrote:
Hello Dave,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Dave Dykstra wrote:
What version of rsync are you using? The cannot create message is coming
from receiver.c. Assuming you're using a released version of rsync and not
a development version
is normally sent from the sender to the receiver, but if
the client is the receiver maybe we could figure out a way to have
--files-from only send the list in the other direction.
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 05:00:14PM -0500, Lenny Foner wrote:
...
[ . . . ]
I'm pretty sure that rsync won't use up memory for excluded files so it
would make no difference.
...though this also implies (since you say it'd probably use basically
the same mechanism internally)
directories
you want instead of --include */.
- Dave Dykstra
You probably need to set
read only = no
in rsyncd.conf.
- Dave
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:29:35PM +0100, Rok Krulec wrote:
Hello,
when I do:
/opt/rsync/bin/rsync /etc/hosts targethost::bkp/
I get:
cannot create .hosts.b0WX1x : File exists
I check the targethost and I get empty
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:11:58AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
...
1. remove AC_FUNC_MEMCMP from configure.in because it causes Sunos
4.1.4 to die. memcmp() there fails the 8-bit clean test, but it
doesn't matter because memcmp() in rsync is only used to test if
something
for excluded files so it
would make no difference.
- Dave Dykstra
to
narrow it down to the smallest reproducible case, preferably one that you
can completely describe to someone else how to reproduce starting from
scratch. Often such an exercise alone will reveal a solution, but if not
at least it allows somebody else to debug it.
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Nov
to be changed. It's surprising that it would prompt for a
password because it needs to be explicitly set up to do so.
If someone could give me a step-by-step approach as to how to configure
rlogin, and subsequently rsync to run through rsh I'd appreciate it.
- Dave Dykstra
No, sorry rsync can't do it. I answered a similar question just last
week. Many people have asked but nobody has made a patch. It's probably
doable but not trivial.
- Dave Dykstra
is not a socket. Is that
sufficient?
- Dave Dykstra
Excuse me, I meant to say if stdin in IS a socket.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 07:46:29AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not in daemon mode.
=
# ps -ef |grep rsync
# rsync --daemon
# ps -ef |grep rsync
root 23716 1 0 07
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 11:07:21AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 08:54:18AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
Excuse me, I meant to say if stdin in IS a socket.
That mode of operation is indeed useful when running rsync --daemon from inetd
or tcpserver. I am talking about
version of rsync by doing
rsync -a rsync://rsync.samba.org/ftp/unpacked/rsync .
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 04:06:45PM -0500, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
I have attached a patch that adds 4 options to rsync that have helped
me to speed up my mirroring. I hope this is useful to someone
example upgrade/,
upgrade/dir1/, and upgrade/dir3/. Sorry, but there's no other way
around it.
- Dave Dykstra
to 1024 in rsync.h. You didn't mention your
operating system, but on Solaris, it is also set the same in param.h so I
would think you would have problems with other tools as well. I don't know
if forcing MAXPATHLEN to a larger value will help or not.
- Dave Dykstra
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:42:53AM +0800, Michael P. Carel wrote:
I'm using RedHat 6.1 and the latest rsync rpm package. I've adding or
incresing its verbosity by having a triple v :
rsync -acvvv --progress --stats --timeout=0 host::shared path
It does start downloading the file and
.
- Dave Dykstra
' or start over with an 'ssh-keygen -t rsa' you should be ok.
Use ssh -v verbose mode to find out for sure what's going on. You may also
have permissions problems on the server; it requires that all files and
parent directories not be world readable.
- Dave Dykstra
and authorized_keys
files hold both kinds of keys, and the *2 files are deprecated. He's using
cygwin 1.3.4 which includes OpenSSH 3.0p1.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 04:23:32PM -0500, Thomas Lambert wrote:
THAT WAS IT!! I just had authorized_keys and not authorized_keys2. I
knew I had to be close.
THANK YOU! THANK YOU! THANK YOU!
Then your server just be older than openssh 3.0. Right?
- Dave Dykstra
are really done?
The most recent snapshots of the development version of rsync will give you
more helpful information if you use -vv, but it's not yet in any released
version. The patch is at
http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/exclude.c.diff?r1=1.32r2=1.33
- Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 10:00:59AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
...
A simplification is this:
+ /iso
+ /iso/1.5.*
+ /iso/1.5.*/i386*
- *
because if you don't have the slash preceding the exclude * it applies at
all levels.
Wait, if i386* matches directories and not just
call bind(2).
- Dave Dykstra
, if there's
not already a fix out there that was just accidentally dropped.
I don't recall anybody else reporting a similar problem, so please try
to track and debug it further.
- Dave Dykstra
there are more issues too.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:12:54AM -0800, Don Mahurin wrote:
I have attached a patch that supports a new --direct-write option.
The result of using this option is to write directly to the destination
files, instead of a temporary file first
which turns off the rsync algorithm, but then you
give up a lot.
- Dave Dykstra
been TCP bugs in
Linux fixed in more recent releases.
It's 2.2.19-ac7 or so and has worked for months without incident, until
now.
That sounds recent enough, but I do recommend upgrading your OpenSSH.
- Dave Dykstra
rsync instead of samba.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 08:05:09AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 02:14:53AM -0800, Ian Kettleborough wrote:
Subject: Re: 2.4.7p1 protocol differences?
Can you please tell me where I can doenload a copy of rsync 2.4.7???
The pre release tarball is at
http
on every file on both sides. Without it, rsync will only
look at files whose timestamps don't match. Since the target directory is
empty in this case, it's computing checksums on all the source files for
nothing.
- Dave Dykstra
Sounds like your gcc is not installed properly.
- Dave Dykstra
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 06:17:20PM -0500, SANJEEV wrote:
I have two machine on which I am getting this error. Both machine is Solaris
7 and rsync version I am trying is 2.4.6.
This is the error
checking whether the C compiler
for the connection to see if there are things in the send queue on one
side but nothing in the receive queue on the other. If that is true, it's
an operating system bug.
- Dave Dykstra
an implementation in C
http://sourceforge.net/projects/xdelta/
and Martin Pool has turned it into a library in C (I don't see where the
home page is -- Martin?). I believe somebody else had talked about a java
implementation but never actually did it.
- Dave Dykstra
and creating specific files owned by those logins and
groups.
- Dave Dykstra
that it didn't come from rsync.
- Dave Dykstra
. What kinds of
hosts, and what transfer method are you using? Perhaps you'd like to try
appling Wayne Davison's no-hang patch on 2.4.6 rathern than using 2.4.7p1,
from
http://www.clari.net/~wayne/rsync-nohang2.patch
- Dave Dykstra
away the reason for making it a
global.
- Dave Dykstra
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
- Dave Dykstra
** --exclude * \
/tmp/empty/ foo@wherever::module
- Dave Dykstra
it was, at the price of changing the inode time. That
will mess up find -cnewer.
- Dave Dykstra
sources separated by space as long as they have same top-level
Multiple sources can be specified in all cases.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Ph. Marek wrote:
Hi everybody,
I want to share a feature request I wrote here some time ago.
I'd like to give rsync more
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 02:26:29PM -0500, Justin Banks wrote:
Dave == Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dave The filename paths that the exclude algorithm sees are relative to the
Dave destination path, they do not include it. It should work if you use
Dave --include /bob
(although it
looks like Martin hasn't gotten around to doing that).
The relevant messages are at the bottom of the page
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-August/thread.html
and near the top of
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-September/thread.html
- Dave Dykstra
modules on an rsync --daemon running
under cygwin, connecting to it from Solaris. I haven't tried to debug it
though, and transfers work OK.
- Dave Dykstra
301 - 400 of 544 matches
Mail list logo
