On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 10:32 -0700, David Feldman wrote:
You won't be able to preserve file flags and creation times since Linux
doesn't have them. On the other hand, rsync 3.0.2 with -X will preserve
getxattr-style extended attributes (including resource forks, which Mac
OS 10.4+ exposes
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 10:09 +0200, Philippe Niquille wrote:
I am using the default rsync 2.6.3 on OS X 10.5.3 and having issues
with my exclude options. I want to exclude a directory which has
whitespace in its name e.g. My Directory by adding --exclude=My
Directory as a relative path.
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:35 -0400, Bodle, Donald E wrote:
Using bytes sent/literal data from statistics as a rough estimation
(I know there is overhead in the bytes sent) of the effectiveness of
compression, most days I see reasonable compression
My initial thought was that days of no
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 08:51 -0400, Abdul Khan wrote:
I have installed cwRsync Server on Windows Server 2000. I having
problems starting the Rsync Server service.
You should ask this on the cwRsync forum:
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 10:02 -0300, Alejandro Celery wrote:
I have a problem: I was running rsync --daemon on a Ubuntu 6.10 linux
without problems. I used it to sync our company intranet from a Windows
host through deltacopy. Then I migrated my system to new hardware and
installed Ubuntu
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 16:14 -0400, Bit Byte wrote:
I am getting a very strange rsync error:
send_files failed to
open /mydir/another/dir/goes/right/here/finally/crazyfilename.xx-what:
No such file or directory
rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at
main.c(1045)
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 07:20 -0700, becca23 wrote:
Thanks for the help, i got the permissions issue worked out, but I'm
interested in this --rsync-path command. It seems like it could be a
powerful tool to make up for the lack of rsync commands in Delta copy.
Yes, you can use it to pass options
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 18:06 +0530, Madan Kumar wrote:
Hi All,
I am posting this querry second time.
What i need is--
{Is there any command by which I can get only the updation of file ie
only the incremental?.
Suppose I have a text file say ss.txt of 3KB in size and I have taken
the
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 11:27 -0700, Tony Mantler wrote:
So I've got this situation where I have two systems connected via a
protocol that looks nothing at all like IP, and I'd like to be able to
rsync between them.
I can, though, open a perfectly normal looking socket through various
magic
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 14:29 -0700, Tony Mantler wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 13:45 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 11:27 -0700, Tony Mantler wrote:
Basically I need to set up the socket beforehand and then hand it to
rsync somehow. This seems to be possible
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 14:59 -0700, Tony Mantler wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 13:45 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
First, you should use an rsync daemon if you aren't already; with the
remote shell mode, you have to get the server arguments across the
socket yourself, whereas
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 18:16 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
That would be --only-write-batch.
Hrm, so it does But creates a $FILE.sh filename. Any
way to prevent that part?
No. If you don't want the $FILE.sh, just delete it.
Also, should running it twice in a row
quickly
On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 13:18 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 18:16 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
That would be --only-write-batch.
=20
Hrm, so it does But creates a $FILE.sh filename. Any
way to prevent that part?
No. If you don't want the
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 10:33 -0500, David Favor wrote:
Now I'm really confused.
If I use the above command with -anv then all '/src/***' files are excluded.
If I 'rm -rf src' and run the command again without -n then all the files
from src get synced again.
I'm confused when -azn and -az
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 14:12 -0500, David Favor wrote:
Let me know if there is some way I can identify the protocol version of the
funet.fi server as I saw no mention of this in the rsync man page.
I passed it the -X option, which it doesn't support, and got this:
rsync: on remote machine:
On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 08:57 +0200, ml wrote:
Instead of just one backup, keep a series of backups on ServerB and
sanity-check them periodically. That way, if ServerA is hacked, you'll
have a period of time to notice and recover from a good backup. To save
space, you could use a tool that
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 12:20 +0200, Gijs Molenaar wrote:
I try to connect to a host that has IPv4 and IPv6, but IPv6 is currently
blocked by ACL's. My host also has IPv6 and IPv4. When I pass the -4 or
--ipv4 option to rsync, it doesn't pass it to ssh: [...]
Currently, options like -4 only
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 12:02 +0530, Madan Kumar wrote:
And also I am able to copy the files or directory in the same location
where these four(rsync.exe,cygwin.dll,cygwin-0-dll,rsync-param.reg)
are. like these are in C:\program files\rsync folder so by using the
command- C:\program
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 08:32 -0700, Meeaz wrote:
All files are transferring now. It however shows an error as follows:-
rsync: failed to set permissions on /var/log/Wlog/TEST/.: Operation not
permitted (1)
This is a potential drawback of the include/exclude approach: the root
source directory
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 13:46 -0500, David Favor wrote:
I'm baffled by exclude syntax. I'm mirroring CPAN and am trying to
exclude all files in the src/ directory. I've tried for days to figure
this out and now throwing myself on the mercy of this list.
Here's my current incantation:
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 10:00 -0600, lewis butler wrote:
On 28-May-2008, at 05:28, David Favor wrote:
/usr/bin/rsync -av --delete --exclude '/src/***'
why all the *?
A trailing triple star makes the rule match /src/ and everything under
it, which is overkill in this case but doesn't hurt
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 12:16 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Wouldn't you know, I can't get rsync to throw an error during
a copy. :) I need to put together some instructions for a guy that runs
a WISP for him to look over before weekly backups are made (I'll be
copying the files to
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 12:43 -0500, David Favor wrote:
Still not working. If I remove a random file like src/fo.md5.txt all the
following fail. In other works, each of the following exclude patterns
recreate the file.
#--exclude='src/'
#--exclude='src/***'
#
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 21:22 +0200, ml wrote:
i would like to copy/mirror/rsync the backup files from ServerA to ServerB.
Since i must assume that ServerA is hacked (public server with a few
services), i would like to pull the files to ServerB (save server with
no services).
That means i
I noticed that somehow the slp additions to the rsyncd.conf.5 man page
ended up in xattrs.diff in the released rsync-patches-3.0.2.tar.gz and
thereby in the Fedora rsyncd.conf.5 man page. This could indicate a
problem with the patch-update script.
Matt
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 06:57 -0700, Meeaz wrote:
We are using rsync version 2.6.3 and do not intend to upgrade to the
latest version. I am using the following command:- rsync -arv
--files-from=./myfile /app/dd/gesb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log/hhsb I want
to mention the file list in the myfile
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 12:07 -0700, Meeaz wrote:
If I run the following command using include option, it does not copy the
first file from under /opt/bea/test directory
rsync -arv --include /opt/bea/test/z* [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/log/Wlog/TEST
Note that the rest of the files are copied.
On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 23:40 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 09:46:04PM -0700, Stuart Anderson wrote:
3) Try excluding a/, this does not work:
# rsync -avn --relative --exclude a/ /tmp/source/./a/? /tmp/destination
That's because 'a' is an implied directory in the
JanakiRam, please CC the rsync list in replies so that your messages
are archived and others can help you.
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 02:34 -0700, JanakiRam wrote:
Is there any way i can specify the custom delimiter to rsync to read
the file names. Please help me to solve this.
You can
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 11:26 +0200, Bruno (libvirt) wrote:
What are the plans to implement TLS directly into the mainstream rsync?
This would be a huge improvement, when using rsync with a daemon and
modules-based setup.
It's already easy to tunnel rsync into ssh, but this requires
1)
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 01:32 -0400, Aaron Davies wrote:
How does this work on OS X/HFS+ (case-preserving, but
case-insensitive)? Any issues with the standard build in a mixed-OS
scenario like this?
The standard version should work mostly fine on a case-insensitive,
case-preserving filesystem.
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 02:35 +, JanakiRam wrote:
I'm new to rsync usage in Mac OS X. I'm having a strange issue with --
files-from option.
I'm providing the --files-from to provide a file , which contains the
list of files separated by newline character , to perform backup
operation.
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 02:35 +, JanakiRam wrote:
I've downloaded the rsync 2.6.9 version and using it to perform backup
to my server. My doubt is when i try to copy a file Does rsync is
capable of copying the resource forks of that files as well ?
Since version 10.4, the Mac OS X filesystem
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:54 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/15/2008 7:18 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
I don't particularly like the option, so my current inclination is to
just keep it available in the patches directory for those that want it.
Hi Wayne,
I hope you don't mind a
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 09:43 -0700, Meeaz wrote:
Is there a way we could transfer files and force rsync not to look for
the same user:group as host on the destination?
If you mean you want destination files to take on the user/group of the
receiving rsync process instead of the source
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 20:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you looked at the man pages (man rsync)? You are using version
2.6.3,
and the manual will tell you that the --no-o and --no-g options are not
available (they were added at a later version).
Moritz is right. I forgot that the
Gabriel,
You sent this internal-looking message to the rsync list. If it
pertains to rsync, would you please explain how?
Matt
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 11:39 +0200, Gabriel CORRE wrote:
Hello Rene,
Maybe have you already upgrade you openssl/openssh packages if you using
debian (or *buntu).
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 13:11 +0200, Manfred Rebentisch wrote:
some people want to use the following construction:
they have a NAS machine with an integrated rsync (may be on embedded linux).
they have a WinXP with cwRsyncServer (with rsync 3.0.2)
and they have on WinXP a network share
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 09:50 -0400, Aaron Davies wrote:
Hi, i have a question about rsyncing a tree which is largely
permissioned for read-only access(444/555, etc.). I have a production
environment which is mostly kept in r/o to make it harder to screw up,
but parts of it are sometimes
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 16:31 -0400, Aaron Davies wrote:
(unfortunately this tree is enormous and takes half an hour just to
index, before any data actually starts moving, or i'd know if i've
fixed that issue)
Rsync 3.0.x's incremental recursion mode will help with that, too.
Matt
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 16:47 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/15/2008 4:31 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 10:55 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Did [the --ignore-case] patch get included in the new 3.0.x standard
version?
No.
O-k... bummer. I thought
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 10:13 -0700, Carl E. Thompson wrote:
Truly, though,
it's not really a problem in rsync but in the backup systems that made
the assumption that rsync's default behavior is appropriate for the job
they are giving it.
My view exactly.
If the default won't be changed then
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 21:04 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
A backup system should at the least ensure that the last version is
correct. If it has to tweak the attributes to do that, it should.
No one is considering leaving the last version incorrect. The
no-tweak mode replaces the destination
On Sat, 2008-05-10 at 15:22 -0700, Carl E. Thompson wrote:
--link-dest introduces other security problems itself which I have
already discussed at length.
I guess you're referring to item 2 in your original description of bug
5448? Item 2a would be solved by the daemon link-dest parameter that
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 09:47 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using rsync between a BSD/OS system and a Linux system.
On the BSD system, the user/group is www.www. On the Linux
system the user/group is apache.apache. I have not yet
found a way to get rsync to change www.www on the source
This is to continue my discussion with Carl from:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5448
about whether no-tweak mode should become rsync's default when --inplace
is not specified. I'm eager to get some comments from other people on
this too.
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 15:07 -0500,
This is to continue my discussion with Carl from:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5448
on methods for hard-linked push backup where the client can't corrupt
old backups via attribute tweaking.
I don't know why one would use cp -al. I was thinking that the client
would
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 17:08 -0700, Carl E. Thompson wrote:
This also appears to be counter to the man page description of the
--inplace option which states
This causes rsync not to create a new copy of the file and then
move it into place.
This implies of course that if the --inplace
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 18:00 +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
can I tell rsync to sync only the directory struture but _not_ the files
inside the directories ?
Yes. Pass the following option to exclude (-) everything but (!)
directories (/):
--filter='-! */'
Matt
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 11:15 +0200, intripoon wrote:
Is there a way to give a list of files to rsync and it only synchronizes
those files?
Yes, --files-from. See the man page for details.
Matt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
To unsubscribe or change
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 17:12 -0500, Rama D. Chavali wrote:
I have a mac pro and a windows Vm which I want to keep sync. I tired
using other Sync programs but they do not seems to be working. I tend
to leave applications running which create their own temp files in its
own specific folder,
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 21:27 -0600, Kenneth Seal wrote:
In my case, rsync displays the error code rsync error: some files
could not be transferred (code 23) and it kills my script. Do you
have any advice on how would I go about writing, researching etc. a
script to tell rsync to ignore
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 14:28 +0530, sri vasulu wrote:
Here i am trying to install rsync3.0.1 on HP-UNIX machine. i have
downloaded the source rsync-3.0.1.tarrsync-patches-3.0.1.tar from
rsync website.
After that i have executed the ./configure, it got executed it
displayed message as rsync
Paul has addressed the errant dollar signs, the misspelled $DST, and two
possible workarounds for the quoting issue, but I would like to explain
the quoting issue a bit further.
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 11:23 -0400, Sterling Windmill wrote:
RSYNC_OPTIONS=-aH --delete --numeric-ids -e \'ssh -p
On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 15:49 -0400, John Taylor wrote:
What I would like to accomplish is the merging of the .preallocate patch
and the .fuzzy option. When these 2 switches are used together (at least
on Windows platforms), I want rsync to determine which fuzzy file to use
(from the
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 16:12 -0700, Ben Wilber wrote:
I would like to be able to
store diffed files in a separate directory on the receiver so it makes
doing an incremental backup easy and efficient. Let me explain:
For completeness, I'll point out that you can accomplish what you
originally
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 11:43 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
Looking for an easy way to prevent a repetitive rsync to be running
multiple times, I was wondering if it could be useful to have an option
like:
--pidfile /some/path/rsync-mirror-org.pid
So that rsync can be run directly from
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 20:55 +0200, Lasse Kliemann wrote:
* Message by -Joao Miguel Ferreira- from Sun 2008-03-30:
We would really like to leave all those important services up but we are
really affraid of producing a corrupted replica...
Use filesystem snapshots.
Linux supports them via
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 19:15 -0400, Clark wrote:
Matt McCutchen wrote:
It's not clear to me how a filesystem snapshot would solve the problem.
It guarantees that rsync sees an instantaneous state of the filesystem,
but that state could still include files that are half-modified by other
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 03:36 -0700, Peter Heiss wrote:
Wayne Davison-2 wrote:
Search for the string admins in the config file. You presumably set
the gid in more than one spot, such as in the module's settings.
I have checked the config file and have not found any duplicates.
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 01:59 -0700, Kurt Martinsen 543 wrote:
I have the same problem:
received request to transfer non-regular file: 88183 [sender]
rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at rsync.c(298)
[sender=3.0.0]
Is it just the one file that gets discarded or is it the whole
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 09:54 -0400, Robert DuToit wrote:
I am trying to help my friend set up his rsync with iconv. Presently
it works fine but re-copies every file with an umlaute in the
filename. I saw a recent post about this and the fix but...
he ran locale ( both source and dest
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 19:59 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
Wayne, please consider adding this material to the copies every file
entry on http://rsync.samba.org/FAQ.html .
I renamed the entry and added more info on extraneous copying. Thanks!
Thanks, but I noticed that you mangled the
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 15:00 -0400, George Georgalis wrote:
I'm trying to use rsync to manage a raw disk image file.
rsync --checksum --perms --owner --group --sparse --partial --progress \
192.168.80.189:/dev/rwd0d /u0510a/rwd0d.img
skipping non-regular file rwd0d
Use the
On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 22:34 -0500, Dan Letkeman wrote:
I have a set of files on my laptop running xp. I'm using
cwRsync_2.0.10 and syncing to a Netware Server. Everything appears to
be working fine, but the stats don't look right. When I run the sync
for the first time it says this:
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 19:56 +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
I am still getting the below error
rsync: failed to set permissions on /var/lib/mysql: Operation not
permitted (1)
[...]
User sms can't set the permissions of files owned by mysql; there's
no way to change this policy using ACLs. I
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 00:36 -0700, Nathan Griffiths wrote:
I'm having a MAJOR issue with an rsync backup script that is actually
OVERWRITING the files that it should be backing up!
BAK_PATH=/Volumes/REM Backup/RsyncBackups/REM
LINK_DEST=/Volumes/REM
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 18:51 -0700, Moole Rathnakar Reddy wrote:
I need help in installing and configuring rsync in AIX 5.3, i
have tested installing the popt and rsync 2.6.2 in a test test box.
steps I have done on both the systems...
Installed the popt and rsync. (By default
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 13:20 +0100, Daniel Maher wrote:
Actually, you can post to the list even if you're not subscribed - the
mail will wait in the moderation queue until an admin releases it,
however.
Whether the/an admin actually performs this function is still up for
debate though. ;)
Stuart,
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 15:33 +, Stuart Halliday wrote:
If they're not on the list why assume they want to be emailed?
If a user asks a question and I answer it, I assume he/she wants to
receive my answer whether or not he/she is on the list. Is that
unreasonable?
Why are non
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 07:04 -0700, Peter Heiss wrote:
# rsync -zav --progress root@remote-server-ip::realperson
/random/file-or-directory
rsync: failed to connect to remote-server-ip: Connection timed out (110)
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(104)
[receiver=2.6.9]
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 16:37 +, Stuart Halliday wrote:
Probably easier to just do:
net use Z: \\sharename\
Run rsync script (with a path of /cygdrive/z/)
net use z: /DELETE
Certainly quicker... ;-)
The problem is that Stefan is operating a daemon with too many shares
for them
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 10:11 -0700, rdwyer wrote:
Rsync seems to intermittently ignore the exclude statement and copies them
from time to time.
rsync -avz --delete --update --stats
--exclude=/library/webserver/documents/domains/mydomain/file_to_exclude.html
-e ssh [EMAIL
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 07:55 +0100, Kalb Stefan wrote:
after some pain it works now.
Great! How did you fix the problem (for the benefit of users having
issues with UNC paths on Cygwin in the future)?
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 11:51 -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
The latest version in the git repository has thwarted my attempts at
receiving or sending files inside an excluded directory.
With exclude = /secret in the configuration file, I can still pull the
contents of a daemon-excluded directory
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 22:55 +0100, david reinares wrote:
when I'm restoring the crypted data after a while rsync shows
rsync: Failed to close: Bad file descriptor (9)
rsync: Failed dup/close: Bad file descriptor (9)
rsync error: error in IPC code (code 14) at pipe.c(208) [receiver=3.0.0]
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 14:20 +0100, Matt wrote:
I am using --link-dest for my rotating backups. Noticing the
--detect-renamed-lax patch to rsync 3.0.0. I was hoping to make use
of the --detect-moved. Unfortunately, --detect-moved does not seem
to recognize the --linkdest option. A
The generator can skip a directory's contents altogether due to
--ignore-non-existing, a daemon exclude, or a mkdir failure. On a --dry-run,
the generator can also note the missingness of a directory while still scanning
its contents. These two scenarios were conflated using a single set of
d7b6774d82ae234978542c43c9ad655c8ade101e
Author: Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Mar 17 15:19:13 2008 -0400
More typo fixes.
---
Summary of changes:
NEWS |4 ++--
configure.in |2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 05:58 -0700, Peter Heiss wrote:
Although, I am still having problems with
the daemon on the remote server. I ran the command rsync --daemon on the
remote server, no error there. But then I ran the following error to do a
test backup and received this error:
# rsync
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 05:58 -0700, Peter Heiss wrote:
hosts allow = trusted.hosts
BTW, the hosts allow field needs to contain the actual list of trusted
hosts, not the name of a file holding the list.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 12:24 +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
ok so basically that would (invoke with SETUID) be to invoke rsync daemon
as root for example? More
or less I have to run the daemon as root to be able to update files for all
users dont I? For example if I want
to rsync the homedirs
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 15:57 +0100, Kalb Stefan wrote:
I try to backup files from a NAS to our backup-server using rsync.
The NAS itself is not able to run rsync.
Therefore I installed rsyncd (cwrsync 2.1.1) on a windowsserver which
has access to the NAS.
I configured the rsyncd like this:
---
rsyncd.conf.yo |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rsyncd.conf.yo b/rsyncd.conf.yo
index f365333..f17e3d5 100644
--- a/rsyncd.conf.yo
+++ b/rsyncd.conf.yo
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ tt(fe80::%link1/:::::)nl()
)
You can also combine hosts
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 17:14 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 14:19 +0100, Lasse Kliemann wrote:
Is this correct behavior?
File `foo' gets overwritten with directory `foo',
even though --ignore-existing is given.
I had never thought about this case, but probably
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 17:48 +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
I've tried implementing this but Im getting a nasty issue, rsync is core
dumping on the recieving server (the daemon
side).
Alas, there's a bug in rsync 3.0.0: a daemon crashes unless it is given
an explicit --config=FILE option. Either
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 18:33 +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
Once last point, does it make any difference if I push or pull from the
server side? Im thinking
the only important thing is if you pull you can set the server side
read-only which is better for
security, that about right??
Yes, that's
Stefan,
Please keep this on the list (CC rsync@lists.samba.org ).
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 17:33 +0100, Kalb Stefan wrote:
I corrected the path to:
[nspPR53_so2]
path = //172.21.87.9/nspPR53_so/material/doc
read only = true
transfer logging = yes
But no success.
Error message remains the
- Collect material that applies to all daemon filters in the documentation of
the filter parameter, and make it more complete and coherent.
- Amplify the recommendation to exclude entire subtrees properly since the
excluded_below check is easy to circumvent and I have proposed removing it
df476bfcff992fb66765d338128dffcf58369722
Author: Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Mar 17 11:30:08 2008 -0400
Fix typo in rsyncd.conf man page.
---
Summary of changes:
rsyncd.conf.yo |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
hooks
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 12:46 +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
can anyone point me at some consise info on when rsync is capable of
performing incremental updates
of binary files? I need to rsync over a network, and currently I have
this over an NFS share but I suppose
that even if binary updates are
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 19:32 +0100, Andy Smith wrote:
If you don't want to touch the server user's authorized_keys file, you
could have a separate user accept the ssh logins and either invoke the
daemon via setuid/sudo or connect to a background daemon on the same
machine (which works
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 17:14 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I m getting bug for incremental backup from my server
Error:Rsync Failed 3072
Rsync does not have such an error message. Probably you are using rsync
as part of a larger backup script and that script is printing the
message. You may
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 11:01 -0400, Ming Zhang wrote:
Some time rsync just return error code 23 that some files are not
transferred. Is there a way to get a list of these files so we can retry
it later time?
For example, we scan the whole file system and N files are not
transferred. Instead
I'd like to expand on Stuart's response a bit...
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 06:29 -0700, Geofoxer wrote:
Thanks for your response, I think that I am on my way of getting stuff
configured here. I still have a couple of questions though. I am also using
linux with rsync!!! I want to clear up the
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 14:15 +, Stuart Halliday wrote:
Forget ssh until you've got it working as plain vanilla Rsync.
Like I said in my 1st posting. Get a working daemon and then list a rsync
folder using a Rsync list command.
Don't do anything else until you've got that working.
---
Note: From now on, my submitted patches will also be pullable from:
http://mattmccutchen.net/rsync/rsync.git/
Matt
rsync.yo |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rsync.yo b/rsync.yo
index 82b0fff..9c99645 100644
--- a/rsync.yo
+++ b/rsync.yo
@@ -1678,8
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 08:25 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
rsync /usr/share/xemacs/blah/bla dest:/usr/share/same/long/path/here
Wouldn't it be nice to have an option to just say:
rsync --same-path /some/long/local/path dest:
Two ways to do this:
1. Use --relative (but this may affect anchored
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 16:02 +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I have updated the windows binary for rsync to 3.0.0 (cwrsync), and
now I get the following error:
receiving file list ... rsync: on remote machine: --iconv=.: unknown option
rsync error: requested action not supported (code 4) at
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 17:11 +0100, Tevfik Karagülle wrote:
I am a little bit confused now. What's best ? An rsync with iconv enabled or
not ?
I thought that iconv support could be useful to handle file names with
foreign characters. However, I see now that an iconv-enabled rsync has some
601 - 700 of 1581 matches
Mail list logo
