On 9/3/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm hoping that it won't be all that much longer before the first
pre-release version will be ready. I mainly want to get hard-link
support working in incremental recursion mode (which is getting pretty
close in my local copy), and to fix a
On 9/6/07, Jonathan Hurd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-04/msg00792.html
Explained:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-04/msg00835.html
This is the exact same problem that I'm experiencing, but couldn't find a
fix for it... Anyone?
As far as I know, the
On 9/6/07, Drift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a proxy server and wanted to know how to get rsync to work through
the proxy.
Perhaps set the RSYNC_PROXY environment variable to the proxy's
hostname:port , as described in the man page?
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
On 9/7/07, Yue Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know why attempt one and two's result looks identical? For
attempt two without the -e ssh how secure is rsync transferring the data?
Is it ssh or just plain binary or ASCII transfer?
The first two commands do exactly the same thing
On 9/9/07, Suresh Govindachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question: How can Wer use the batch file /e/cmds/foo to recover
c_a in a timely manner (recall /e/gold is 200 Gigs and
Wer cannot wait to rebuild the entire
/f/new_home/wer/work; and he needs c_a
Thanks. Please re-run rsync at -vvv verbosity level to make the
receiver print the modification times it intends to set. Then send
the verbose output and the actual modification times on the source and
destination for the affected files. That should help us figure out
what is going on.
Matt
On 9/9/07, Suresh Govindachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about the following scheme?
open /e/cmds/foo
do till end-of-file:
begin-continue
discard lines till there is a match to some/path/projects/c_a
keep lines till there is a match to a directory outside
On 9/11/07, brad miele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am hoping to use rsync with the --remove-sent-files option. the sending
side of the transaction will very likely include files that are being
written to when rsync is run. will rsync include these partial files in
it's list? i want to avoid the
On 9/12/07, Suresh Govindachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say one starts with creating an archive
rsync work - archive
and periodically (below, i = 1 to N) does
rsync --backup-dir=a_i work - archive
and rsync --compare-dest=archive work - b_i
Then suppose one
On 9/13/07, Suresh Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anybody tell me the good way of find out the which process is opened too
many files and this is causing rsync fails to open new fd??
The error message tells you: it's the client/receiver process.
Currently i want to see /proc/pid/fd
On 9/14/07, Hugo Connery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I[...] wish now to collect file usage statistics per user per rsync operation.
There is already a --stats option that provides some statistics. Does
that give you everything you want? If not, what other statistics do
you want?
Matt
--
To
Note: In the future, please Cc the rsync list in your responses so
that others can help you if I become unavailable and so that future
users can refer to your message.
On 9/15/07, Hugo Connery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to obtain summary statistics grouped by file owner and access times.
On 9/16/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can rsync support active mirroring? I've used robocopy in the past and it
has a –mon switch that can copy ever x changes or every x minutes. I'm
mostly interested in the x changes as the x minutes could easily be
scheduled.
Darryl Dixon
On 9/16/07, Hugo Connery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, uid/access time based statistics gathering is quite orthogonal to
rsync's motivation. But, rsync, as it backs up my data, it has access
to all the statistics I need, so why not piggy back the stats gathering
on rsync as a matter of
On 9/15/07, roland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what`s the rsync equivalent to this?
how can i see which files changed while rsync was transferring them ?
Handling of concurrent changes to source files is one of rsync's
weaknesses. The rsync sender naively reads each source file from
beginning to
On 9/18/07, Fabian Cenedese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering what happens if a file that is regularly synched but
seldom changes gets corrupted in the copy.
Are you referring to rsync writing corrupted data to the destination
file or a problem with the destination filesystem or disk
On 9/19/07, Fabian Cenedese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the explanations. That means that -l and -c are not
usable together as they contradict themselves, right?
Correct. I tested with rsync 2.6.9 and it appears that if you use
both, -c overrides -I.
I guess if I first made a normal
On 9/22/07, Robert Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do a
simple tar of /var twice and then rsync the two files only as a test, no
folders involvedtrying to determine why the entire file is being
copied in its entirety and not synchronized bit-by-bit.
esmtp# rsync -az --progress
On 9/22/07, David Fletcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It plays Ogg files from my PC perfectly well, but only in the same order in
which it thinks they were copied onto its flash memory. It makes no attempt
to sort the file names into alphabetical order to play them.
I imagine the player is
On 9/21/07, Kenneth Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I neglected to mention the source is uncompressed but
we need to compress the target file because we're running out
of disk space and the files are highly compressible.
You might try the experimental patch
On 9/22/07, Robert Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying that rsync knows
the difference and will enable/disable delta transfers depending on
whether local or not?
Yes.
However, again, I get the same result doing remote
transfers.
Either the delta transfer algorithm is not
On 9/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i can transfer remote files to a local dir and they are being compressed on
the
local side
Good, so it basically works.
+Use of --dest-filter automatically enables --whole-file.
I suppose the patch could be changed to allow delta
On 9/23/07, Robert Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doing some more testing this morning, maybe what you suggested about the
pgsql backup is what is happening. I took a closer look and realize that
my sql backup is actually smaller some days than the destination, will
that affect delta
On 9/23/07, Robert Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 00:56 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
Either the delta transfer algorithm is not being used due to a
misconfiguration, or the pgsql backups are changing in a perverse way
that prevents it from matching any data
On 9/23/07, WebTent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I am getting matched data, but it just doesn't seem to be matching
very much considering the small change in file size. I tested one dump
after another rsyncing in between dumps and got very little matched
data :(
mx1# pg_dump -Fc -Upgsql
On 9/24/07, Fabian Cenedese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if it would be possible to add a switch (probably coupled
to -v(+) ) that would report the number of matched blocks per file. Maybe
even with the offset of the block.
Rsync already lists all matched blocks by their offsets
On 9/24/07, Sylvain Viart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from the source host I do :
rsync -rtlv --exclude='.svn/**' --exclude=.svn --delete preprod/
rsync://remote-host/deploiement/preprod/
the --dry-run gives me some file to delete.
but when I run the command without --dry-run, nothing is
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble running rsync over a mapped drive. Basically it only
copies whole files. I use the –rvcS switches. Any suggestions?
The delta-transfer algorithm reduces only the communication between
the sending and receiving rsync
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly is involved in the remote shell? Can this be done on a windows
to windows backup? Do you have a link handy otherwise google to the rescue.
Thank you very much.
You set up an ssh server on the machine with the mapped drive,
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason I was trying this was because all I can do is map a drive. As of
yet, I cannot modify the server like that.
If the only access you have to the remote directory is to read or
write it via a mapped drive, you can't hope to do any
On 9/24/07, Richard Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Searching the WEB, I have found references to a
-X option to rsync, but this option does not exist in the RHEL4
version of rsync.
Is there rsync source code somewhere, compatible with my OS, I
could compile that would fix my problem?
Yes.
On 9/25/07, Sylvain Viart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly what I've also found. See my post : Re: --delete not working =
+filtering disable delete!
Indeed; I responded to your first post without noticing that you had
posted again. I try to avoid doing that, but I'm not perfect.
remove
The email you sent to the rsync list seems to be empty. If you have a
question, please try posting it again.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On 9/26/07, Richard Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I downloaded the source from the samba.org site. My current
question/problem is that after I compiled and installed, it did not
provide/create an rsyncd.conf file. Do I have to create one from
scratch?
No, you can keep the one you were
On 9/26/07, Box, Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I do have available on the source server an exact, simple list of
what should be copied and also what should be deleted, and if I could
control the rsync processing with this file, I should be able to cut down
the process to just a few
Fabian's suggestion to use the CVS rsync with incremental recursion is
good; that will be an improvement. However, rsync still has to
remember all files in S1 that had multiple hard links in case they
show up again in S2. If remembering the contents of even one of the
directories makes rsync run
On 9/28/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would this still help for online
storage though as most have much greater download bandwidth than upload. So
it would basically download the file with your faster download speeds,
compare, then upload the changes with your slower upload
On 9/28/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to have rsync cache the checksums for something like this and
would that help?
I'm not sure exactly what you mean. You said you were using the -c
(--checksum) option, which makes rsync decide whether to update each
On 9/30/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is some files don't change in size. So I was hoping that the
checksums could be cached. Perhaps I'm mistaken but I thought the checksum
determined what actual blocks were transferred. I suppose it could be
cached at either
On 10/1/07, Peter Salameh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has the rsync team considered an rsync option which would remember the
last file list on both ends, and only send changes to the list?
Perhaps a more natural approach is to use the delta-transfer algorithm
to send the file list. Jamie Lokier
On 10/1/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the next release is supposed to speed this up.
Are you thinking of incremental recursion? It interleaves file list
and file data transmission but does not decrease the total amount of
file-list data sent.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or
On 9/25/07, Sylvain Viart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I said, Protect and Hide, are not really documented. It's only said in
the doc :
hide, H specifies a pattern for hiding files from the transfer.
You're right that that line is not enough to thoroughly explain hide
filters. However, the
On 10/1/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought it was supposed to do it more effeciently
Not that I know of. (Wayne, please correct me if necessary.)
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read:
On 10/1/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's get terminology out of the way first. The computer
sending data is the client and the computer storing the backups is the
server.
No, you may be pushing, but Havoc is pulling. Look at the command in
the original message:
I am
On 10/1/07, Steve Radich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wouldn't robocopy better serve these EXACT needs? It doesn't handle
partial file transfers, but neither will rsync given that you are
running it only on one end - I.e. to calculate the crc to compare the
files contents it would have to read the
On 9/30/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, let's say this is the first sync and every file is being transferred.
The checksum for each of the files is cached on the local drive. Then, the
next time you sync, it checks the checksum from the cache against the file
to be copied.
On 10/1/07, Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the remote filesystem supports efficient copying of a range of data
from one offset to another, then #2 is moot and a smart client can do
both pushes and pulls efficiently using your scheme and zsync's
reverse delta-transfer algorithm
On 10/1/07, Suresh Govindachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In regard to output, rsync has the following features:
Where can I find an explanation of the format, content
and interpretation of the outputs (a-e)?
a) -v option with various levels of verbosity
Roughly, here is what is
On 10/1/07, Suresh Govindachar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) consider the message:
2007/09/13 16:50:52 [13688] receiving file list
Isn't the list of files determined from the command line used to
invoke rsync? So what this new list of files that are being
received from
On 10/2/07, Peter Salameh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that. Doesn't the delta-transfer algorithm compare the files
on sender and receiver?
Correct.
For the file list, we would only need compare the
new file list with the last one on the sender
Unison (
On 10/2/07, Noam Birnbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any suggestions on how to estimate how much data rsync would synchronize on
average in a given installation? Assume that a full rsync has already run
and the only data being updated is just the daily diffs.
As Steve implied, the best way is
On 10/4/07, OOzy Pal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
excludes-nix
*
include-nix
Development/*
www/*
Personal/*
You are including items immediately inside each of the directories
Development, www, Personal but not the directories themselves, also,
the exclude rule * is excluding items more than
On 10/4/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, due to a bug in cygwin's pipe code (the pipe that carries data
between rsync and ssh). Until cygwin fixes its pipe code, you can only
reliably rsync data to/from a cygwin system if you avoid pipes (e.g. use
a daemon transfer).
I'm not
On 10/3/07, Jake Conk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] I enabled jumble frames by setting the mtu to 9000.
Jumble frames! Now there's an idea to join the ranks of the April
Fools' Day RFCs! :-D
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before
On 10/4/07, Frank Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This action is the simplest method of performing an rsync, but it would be
nice to have rsync to be intelligent enough to recognize a name change but
not an inode change on the source.
The --detect-renamed option provided by the patch
On 10/4/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre1, the first pre-release version for
the upcoming 3.0.0 release.
Hooray! I have built an RPM of rsync 3.0.0pre1 and posted it here:
http://mattmccutchen.net/rsync/#rsync-packages
This pre-release has finally
On 10/5/07, limule pika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/07, Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] If remembering the contents of even one of the
directories makes rsync run out of memory, you'll have to do something
different.
Thanks for your reply.I think that there is too many
On 10/5/07, Jake Conk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think whatever your reading is probably wrong. It doesn't make sense
or else like wha you said nothing will be able to communicate over
jumbo frames.
*Jumbo* frames are fine. In one place in your original message, you
made a typo and called
On 10/4/07, Manuel Kissoyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wondering if there are somewhere to download an rpm version for centos?
My RPM will probably work fine on CentOS, as it is based on the Fedora
packaging and Fedora is similar to CentOS. If you want a pure CentOS
package, you or I could
On 10/5/07, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to me the best way to accomplish this is to be sure that the
parent directory is not a directory that someone can rename... ie, when
I rsync our home directories, there is no danger of anyone ever renaming
the 'home' directory...
So,
On 10/5/07, N.J. van der Horn (Nico) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a tricky problem to deal with i think, it is tempting to keep a
checksum'd file/directory list on both sides with information like:
* a fingerprint/signature/checksum to identify each file or directory
* inode number
*
On 10/3/07, Thiep Duong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know why it take this long?
Well, the simplest explanation is that more source data had changed
than usual or someone renamed a large directory (which looks like a
deletion + creation to rsync). There could be something else going
on, but
On 10/6/07, Erik Jan Tromp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would appear something snuck in that breaks non-recursive remote
listings when talking to a non-3.0.0pre1 version of rsync. The symptom
itself is simple enough to see; rather than displaying member
directories/regular files/symlinks/etc as
On 10/7/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was a simple problem with the code that was trying to skip implied
directories failing to check if the relative flag was set. The latest
CVS version has this fixed.
That fix misses the point. If I pass --relative --no-implied-dirs,
the
In the process of investigating this, I ran across another oddity with
--dirs and --relative that appears to be present in both rsync 2.6.9
and the current CVS rsync. When a source argument ends in a ./ but
isn't ./ itself, rsync skips the subdirectories. Continuing the
previous example:
$
On 10/7/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:18:46AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
That fix misses the point.
No, it's just incomplete. Patience.
Sorry. What I meant was that, once impliedness of directories is
represented properly (which is necessary
On 10/7/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, this backup contains about 100GB of photos. It seems to
backup each file every backup. Any ideas?
Try --modify-window=1 .
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before
On 10/7/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:16:01AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
And one final thought that occurred to me: it would also be possible
for the sender to segment a really large file into several chunks,
handling each one without overlap, all
On 10/7/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still seems to transfer all files. Funny thing is it seems to only do it
for the pictures folder.
Please run rsync with -i and look at the output to see why it is
transferring the files.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
On 10/9/07, Frank Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've decided to proceed down another path to solve this problem, at least
until rsync is able.
You aren't happy with --detect-renamed ?
Is there any way to
change the dry-run option to display a probable transfer size if the command
was run.
On 10/9/07, James V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to use rsync to backup our Linux server and when the rsync is
running it uses 1-2% CPU for most operations until it reaches a tar file (or
another file archive), then the CPU usage increases to 90%. I am assuming
that rsync is looking
On 10/10/07, Frank Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, I'm not sure how to safely compile this into rsync
I don't know what you mean by safely. To get an rsync executable
with the patch, download an rsync source package from
http://rsync.samba.org/ (your choice of the stable rsync 2.6.9 or a
On 10/11/07, Frank Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Matt for your reply. What my problem is, I didn't install rsync
from source, but through a rpm package. I wonder if it is possible to
apply the patch and re-create the rpm, to minimize the work involved.
Yes. Obtain the rsync source
On 10/11/07, Manuel Kissoyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt, any chance you do one compiled with glibc 2.3.x?
No, and I don't know of a way that I could make one without actually
installing glibc 2.3.x on my system, which would break everything.
Instead, you could rebuild my source RPM on your
Dear webmaster,
The download links in the cvsweb interface to the rsync source
repository (e.g., on
http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/patches/detect-renamed.diff
) don't work. They give an error page similar to the one attached.
Please fix this.
Thanks,
Matt
Title: Error
âââââ
On 10/11/07, Frank Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Matt again for the info. So now I'm feeling foolish. I tried to just
pull the latest version of this from the cvs and I keep getting the following
errors when I try to click onto 'download'.
Yes, the cvsweb seems to be broken; I have
On 10/11/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre2, the second pre-release version for
the upcoming 3.0.0 release.
I have built RPMs (source and i386 binary) for rsync 3.0.0pre2:
http://mattmccutchen.net/rsync/#rsync-packages
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or
On 10/11/07, Manuel Kissoyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using which Glibc version?
The one that is on my computer: Fedora's glibc-2.6-4 .
If you want an RPM that works with the glibc on your servers, just
rebuild my source RPM on one of the servers:
$ wget
On 10/11/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a terrible time with one particular customer using rsync. Every
once in awhile, they create a folder like Jon Const. Rsync seems to have
a terrible time with the period in the folder name. After the backup runs
and fails due
On 10/11/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
XP Pro on both ends. This is the error in the log
building file list ... file has vanished: /cygdrive/F/Share/CP
Art/M-P/M/McCullough Const.
done
IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion
I imagine that once a period gets into the
On 10/8/07, Mario Domgörgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm trying to backup one of my hosts with a two rsync-scripts, which are
mainly just calling on the client side
/usr/bin/rsync --server --sender -vlogDtprz --delete-excluded
--numeric-ids --exclude-from=/etc/sm-backup/rsync.exclude /
and
destination
file without verifying that its data matches that of the source file.
This is risky but it is what Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wanted:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2007-October/018827.html
This patch is EXPERIMENTAL, though it did work correctly in my single test.
-- Matt McCutchen
Wayne,
The detect-renamed.diff in the current CVS rsync appears to be very
badly broken. I have fixed it and made some other improvements:
Crash fixes:
- Move misplaced the_fattr_list initialization hunk back to recv_file_list
- Send --detect-renamed to the sender so it knows to disable
. I didn't even know that it was available in that tarball. I
have really no experience in making or modifying rpm's. New stuff to learn!
Frank.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matt McCutchen
Sent: Thu 10/11/2007 5:58 PM
To: Frank Thomas
Cc: rsync
On 10/12/07, Alexandros Papadopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With that in mind, I would go for one daemon on machine A, and the two
other machines using simple scripted rsync commands to exchange data
with the daemon.
Having the other machines connect to A via ssh may be easier than
setting
in my light
testing.
FIXME: If a run with --trust-rename stages a different-basename destination
file and then gets interrupted, a subsequent run with --trust-move trusts
the staged file.
-- Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- old/generator.c
+++ new/generator.c
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ extern int
On 10/12/07, Frank Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for telling me of it's issues. When the patch approaches testing,
please contact me and I can setup a test environment to test transfers in the
Gig's.
I have fixed the patch and Wayne has committed my fixes to the CVS.
You may test
On 10/15/07, Aaron Digulla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please modify the backup options to work together with
--remove-source-files so I'm able to create a reliable move between
hosts script?
The patch patches/source-backup.diff in the source tree adds an
option --source-backup to do
Please CC the list so people other than me can help you and so your
messages will be available to future users.
On 10/15/07, Mario Domgörgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, i don't run the client side command myself. The backup should start
from the server, so i use the the second command to
On 10/13/07, Alan Cheers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you had multiple people making rsync backups over ssh wouldn't it be
preferred to use the single-use daemons from a security standpoint? If
multiple people use this method I would want to limit the chance of somebody
being able to grab
On 10/15/07, Aaron Digulla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the input. If this wasn't for a production system, I'd do
that :-) Why don't you apply the patch the release version?
Because the patch is a quick hack to serve a niche need, so the
benefit of saving people who need source backups a
On 10/15/07, Aaron Digulla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I'll try to convince my bosses to see this as payment for
using rsync :-) I just hope I can find a simple way to build rsync on
Windows ... I guess I'll try with Cygwin since I already have that
installed and I could build GhostPCL
On 10/15/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a system call that allows their permissions to be changed
after they've been created? (Since lchmod is lacking.)
I don't think so, but as Wesley hinted, one can effectively change a
symlink's permissions by deleting it, setting the
On 10/15/07, Erik Jan Tromp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# The second error
Invalid file index: -101 (-1 - 0) with iflags 0 [receiver]
rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at rsync.c(273)
[receiver=3.0.0pre2]
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (21 bytes received so far) [generator]
On 10/13/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] committed:
Added Files:
detect-renamed-lax.diff
Log Message:
My version of Matt's --trust-rename patch.
The option --detect-moved should be named --detect-moved-lax because
it contains the lax behavior. --detect-moved would mean use a file
On 10/16/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It also allows for
future expansion in certain situations -- e.g. I can imagine making a
future version of --prune-empty-dirs and/or --delay-updates compatible
with inc-recursion, and this will allow a more modern rsync to try to
tell a
On 10/16/07, Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I agree that it is better for the client to explicitly tell the
server what is going on (and allows a batch file to indicate what is
happening too).
Now you could revert the unconditional sending of --detect-renamed in
On 10/16/07, Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(That's why I said negotiate.)
One more thing I want to point out in case you haven't already thought
of it. Once two-way negotiation is in place, each side should refuse
incremental recursion only if it can't fulfill its *own* duties under
On 10/17/07, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/opt/csw/bin/rsync --port=55873 -avPi winds06.win.ch.da.rtr::racebeta/xml \
winds06.win.ch.da.rtr::racebeta/xrfsharedresource \
/opt/apps/Teamcenter/Production/racebeta
b) Why does rsync copy files to this directory in the first place?
Wayne,
I would like to import the entire rsync CVS repository into git for my
own use. I can do this by fetching revisions one by one from the
pserver, but it's abominably slow and probably bogs down the server
unacceptably. Is there somewhere I can download a snapshot of the
repository (which
501 - 600 of 1581 matches
Mail list logo
