[Bug 6672] transfer & set nano-second times on files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6672 --- Comment #2 from Teodor Milkov 2014-08-04 08:24:25 UTC --- Maybe the easiest fix here would be, to extend cmp_time() in util.c to receive two more parameters: file1_st_mtimensec and file2_st_mtimensec? I guess this is not going to be portable...

[Bug 10756] rsync can't create files or dirs in subdirs (sometimes?)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10756 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 10756] New: rsync can't create files or dirs in subdirs (sometimes?)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10756 Summary: rsync can't create files or dirs in subdirs (sometimes?) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: regres

[Bug 8847] detect-renamed.diff update to ensure existence of directory for partial-dir

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8847 --- Comment #3 from bjqu...@seidal.com 2014-08-03 02:54:59 UTC --- I'm going to do some testing, but it appears that this fix is probably in 3.1.1. In the process of applying the modifications suggested here (basically, add the do_mkdir_path functio

[Bug 10748] New: 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 create all dirs on target even with --prune-empty-dirs

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10748 Summary: 3.1.0 and 3.1.1 create all dirs on target even with --prune-empty-dirs Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Seve

[Bug 10244] link-by-hash patch: speed enhancement by hash calculation on source side

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10244 --- Comment #1 from Dave Yost 2014-07-26 01:08:58 UTC --- rsync --link-dest could try a bit harder to find candidates for a hard link. I suggest an option to rsync that works like this when you give it a file size argument: Before copying, on the

[Bug 10738] report --stats output when termination signal arrives

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 --- Comment #3 from Mark Smith 2014-07-24 22:50:06 UTC --- markie likes the SIGUSR1 idea too and it has precedents with dd as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug 10738] report --stats output when termination signal arrives

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Korb 2014-07-24 21:48:12 UTC --- This sounds like a good idea to me. It also sounds a lot like what dd does if you send it sigusr1. Therefore I will suggest that if this is added to rsync we should also have the ability

[Bug 10738] report --stats output when termination signal arrives

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 --- Comment #1 from roland 2014-07-24 21:44:38 UTC --- this sounds really useful ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. -

[Bug 10738] New: report --stats output when termination signal arrives

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 Summary: report --stats output when termination signal arrives Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priorit

[Bug 7120] Variable bandwidth limit .. bwlimit

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7120 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10724] rsync 3.1.1 incorrectly creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir on Mac OSX

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 --- Comment #2 from chd...@gmail.com 2014-07-18 04:26:08 UTC --- For fun I cloned the git repo and bisected. The first commit that exhibits the aforementioned buggy behavior is: 3696674bc62b0c1250027dbeedafdd7ebafdcf8b which carries the descriptio

[Bug 10724] rsync 3.1.1 incorrectly creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir on Mac OSX

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 --- Comment #1 from chd...@gmail.com 2014-07-18 03:28:52 UTC --- My apologies, this bug is also present on rsync 3.1.0. I still think it's a bug. Also, I was almost right; it didn't work like this on 3.0.9 and earlier. -- Configure bugmail: http

[Bug 10724] New: rsync 3.1.1 incorrectly creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir on Mac OSX

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 Summary: rsync 3.1.1 incorrectly creates extra dirs inside --backup-dir on Mac OSX Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW

[Bug 10719] New: Error with cached effective process gid

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10719 Summary: Error with cached effective process gid Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Com

[Bug 10715] New: IPv6 configure test fails on musl c-library

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10715 Summary: IPv6 configure test fails on musl c-library Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Co

[Bug 10705] usermap/groupmap do not escape wildcards passed to the remote

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10705 --- Comment #1 from Daniel O'Connor 2014-07-10 01:21:17 UTC --- I looked through the code and found the --protect-args option which does make --chown work. I guess it would be difficult to fix unless the wildcard character was changed to somethin

[Bug 10705] New: usermap/groupmap do not escape wildcards passed to the remote

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10705 Summary: usermap/groupmap do not escape wildcards passed to the remote Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: nor

[Bug 10681] Add an option to delete non-existent files in --files-from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10681 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Yu Okunev 2014-07-02 09:48:25 UTC --- Hello. (In reply to comment #0) > I have a script which monitors file system events and then calls rsync using > --files-from, however that does not handle the case where those file

[Bug 10681] Add an option to delete non-existent files in --files-from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10681 --- Comment #3 from Daniel O'Connor 2014-07-01 04:49:03 UTC --- Hah thanks, I thought I had the latest but apparently not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 10681] Add an option to delete non-existent files in --files-from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10681 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10681] Add an option to delete non-existent files in --files-from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10681 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb 2014-07-01 03:20:27 UTC --- Upgrade your rsync and use --delete-missing-args -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the

[Bug 10681] New: Add an option to delete non-existent files in --files-from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10681 Summary: Add an option to delete non-existent files in --files-from Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhanc

[Bug 10677] external zlib broken after update to 3.1.1 on FreeBSD

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10677 --- Comment #2 from Emanuel Haupt 2014-06-30 07:30:49 UTC --- Sorry about the confusion, I should have been more clear. The FreeBSD version is built with --with-included-zlib=no by default. After reading the man page entry again about -z, --compr

[Bug 10677] external zlib broken after update to 3.1.1 on FreeBSD

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10677 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 10679] New: readlink_stat error results in deletion of mountpoints

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10679 Summary: readlink_stat error results in deletion of mountpoints Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug 10678] performance problem with lots of hard links?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10678 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Korb 2014-06-27 15:50:15 UTC --- BTW, it is possible to move to lvm2 based storage without rsync. You could setup the lvm2 volume and then use dd or ddrescue (better status display and can be restarted if you specify a l

[Bug 10678] performance problem with lots of hard links?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10678 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb 2014-06-27 15:42:27 UTC --- This is a common problem. The thing is that rsync has to stat() every single one of those hard links and remember an inode>filename mapping for each. If you have lots of backups this can

[Bug 10678] New: performance problem with lots of hard links?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10678 Summary: performance problem with lots of hard links? Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 C

[Bug 10677] New: external zlib broken after update to 3.1.1 on FreeBSD

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10677 Summary: external zlib broken after update to 3.1.1 on FreeBSD Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug 10675] New: rsyncing >2GB file onto fat32 partition should fail earlier

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10675 Summary: rsyncing >2GB file onto fat32 partition should fail earlier Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: nor

[Bug 10356] Include rsync-no-vanished support script

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10356 --- Comment #3 from Wayne Davison 2014-06-26 15:22:47 UTC --- Rsync doesn't exit with error code 24 if a more important error happens (which is basically any other error). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -

[Bug 10356] Include rsync-no-vanished support script

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10356 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry Yu Okunev 2014-06-26 04:39:41 UTC --- IMHO, this's wrong by design solution. There should be an option in rsync itself, but not a hacky wrapper. BTW. couldn't there be a situation, that rsync got two errors (one of whic

[Bug 10668] Remote rsync daemon still showing deleted file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10668 --- Comment #4 from Barry Sanford 2014-06-22 17:45:57 UTC --- Ahhh!!! The fault, then, is in my own understanding, or lack thereof. I was under the false assumption that the pre-exec ran only when files were being copied. But now my understandi

[Bug 10290] Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 --- Comment #11 from Wayne Davison 2014-06-22 17:32:18 UTC --- Any rsync with the buggy revert applied won't work right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --

[Bug 10668] Remote rsync daemon still showing deleted file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10668 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10668] Remote rsync daemon still showing deleted file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10668 --- Comment #2 from Barry Sanford 2014-06-22 14:46:51 UTC --- Btw, the HardLink file is created by the pre-exec script as a symbolic link to the previous day's backup folder. For example, if the current backup folder is 201406022, then the pre-ex

[Bug 10668] Remote rsync daemon still showing deleted file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10668 --- Comment #1 from Barry Sanford 2014-06-22 14:38:18 UTC --- I have a server on my LAN that's hosting an rsync daemon. When I backup to the 'Backups' module on this server I have a 'pre-exec' script that creates a 'HardLink' file. Then a 'post-

[Bug 10668] New: Remote rsync daemon still showing deleted file

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10668 Summary: Remote rsync daemon still showing deleted file Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 10643] cmp_time() returns incorrect result due to integer overflow

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10643 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10290] Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 --- Comment #10 from mlus...@redhat.com 2014-06-12 14:33:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > The only rsyncs that will have an issue with this are the > 3.1.0pre* versions and any of the fedora-patched versions, but since they have > a buggy imple

[Bug 10290] Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 --- Comment #9 from Wayne Davison 2014-06-08 17:47:51 UTC --- I'm glad that change got some testing, because I had missed a hunk in the undo of the prior change (see hash 03bb593f). I have gone on to make the change in a better fashion so that rsy

[Bug 10649] New: --acls does not honor --numeric-ids on OS X

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10649 Summary: --acls does not honor --numeric-ids on OS X Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 2423] Feature Request: Ability to transfer files newer than date or file. (--newer switch).

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2423 --- Comment #10 from Rainer Glaschick 2014-06-04 06:56:27 UTC --- I vote for the original proposal. Using --files-from does not work with --delete, which is absolutely correct, but --newer could delete all files on the target that are not in the ne

[Bug 2294] Detect renamed files and handle by renaming instead of delete/re-send

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2294 --- Comment #21 from Petr Pisar 2014-06-02 16:47:06 UTC --- There is a bug #8847 in the patchset when partial-dir cannot be created. The fix is described there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

[Bug 10643] New: cmp_time() returns incorrect result due to integer overflow

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10643 Summary: cmp_time() returns incorrect result due to integer overflow Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: norma

[Bug 10290] Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 --- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson 2014-05-29 18:56:14 UTC --- So it looks like a Fedora user hit this bug, and reported it as https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10364 (which was closed as a dupe of this one) and https://bugzilla.redhat.c

[Bug 10637] rsync --link-dest should break hard links when encountering "Too many links"

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 --- Comment #1 from Karl O. Pinc 2014-05-28 19:05:04 UTC --- Yum is also rsync happy. That's where our --link-dest backups always break due to too many hard links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

[Bug 10638] New: Add include/exclude files by mime type

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10638 Summary: Add include/exclude files by mime type Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Co

[Bug 10637] New: rsync --link-dest should break hard links when encountering "Too many links"

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10637 Summary: rsync --link-dest should break hard links when encountering "Too many links" Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Bug 10636] New: Feature request: Show current source path on receipt of Posix signal

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10636 Summary: Feature request: Show current source path on receipt of Posix signal Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severi

[Bug 10568] --copy-links Fails if link name has more than 32 chars

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568 --- Comment #3 from Wayne Davison 2014-05-26 21:57:53 UTC --- If you were expecting the destination symlink to be followed, that is not how rsync works. The -L option just affects source symlinks, and the -K option just affects destination symlink

[Bug 10568] --copy-links Fails if link name has more than 32 chars

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568 --- Comment #2 from David Levy 2014-05-26 21:35:15 UTC --- Running rsync -L Should convert each link in directory to it's referent file, when the filename exceeds 32 chars that fails. This is easy to test, don't just resolve cause that fails. Le

[Bug 8308] rsync: exclude.c:532: change_local_filter_dir: Assertion `dir_depth < 4096/2+1' failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10568] --copy-links Fails if link name has more than 32 chars

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 9594] Error transferring user and non-user xattr using --fake-super under Linux

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9594 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10580] Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Wayne Davison

[Bug 10629] New: rsync follows symlinks that point to same directory / endless loop

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10629 Summary: rsync follows symlinks that point to same directory / endless loop Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severi

[Bug 10611] No error code returned when removing source file failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10611 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10621] New: Allow Filter Rule Imports Relative to Importer

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10621 Summary: Allow Filter Rule Imports Relative to Importer Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

[Bug 10611] New: No error code returned when removing source file failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10611 Summary: No error code returned when removing source file failed Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor

[Bug 10024] rsync cannot delete remote file, yet exit value is 0.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024 Peter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peto2...@hotmail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter 20

[Bug 7951] Option for case insensitivity in filter rules

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7951 --- Comment #4 from Haravikk 2014-05-10 14:19:28 UTC --- I'd just like to say that I'd also prefer the implementation proposed by Chris Dunlop; an i flag on filter rules would be a lot more flexible. I recently encountered the problem with this whe

[Bug 10603] rsync between local folder and mounted nfs folder sometimes overwrites newer files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10603 --- Comment #4 from Jeff Davies 2014-05-10 08:29:44 UTC --- Of course. For some reason I thought -a included -u behaviour. Perhaps suggest adding -u to the example on the man page? I know it isn't wrong, but may be more what people want to do?

[Bug 10603] rsync between local folder and mounted nfs folder sometimes overwrites newer files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10603 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10603] rsync between local folder and mounted nfs folder sometimes overwrites newer files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10603 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb 2014-05-09 23:16:14 UTC --- It is supposed to do that unless you supply --update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You ar

[Bug 10603] rsync between local folder and mounted nfs folder sometimes overwrites newer files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10603 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Korb 2014-05-09 23:16:41 UTC --- Oh, also, don't -z unless rsync is networking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the Q

[Bug 10603] New: rsync between local folder and mounted nfs folder sometimes overwrites newer files

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10603 Summary: rsync between local folder and mounted nfs folder sometimes overwrites newer files Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Bug 10601] Retry Delay for Vanished Files/Directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10601 --- Comment #1 from Haravikk 2014-05-09 19:25:27 UTC --- Just wanted to add that it may make sense to separate the retry somehow so that folders can be retried while files are skipped, for example, as backups of an in-use hierarchy will be more lik

[Bug 10601] New: Retry Delay for Vanished Files/Directories

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10601 Summary: Retry Delay for Vanished Files/Directories Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Com

[Bug 7120] Variable bandwidth limit .. bwlimit

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7120 --- Comment #5 from roland 2014-05-06 18:11:03 UTC --- what`s "unstable" in the way i described it? why build every feature in every tool when the power of unix is to concatenate tools in a way to handle requirements? -- Configure bugmail: https:

[Bug 7120] Variable bandwidth limit .. bwlimit

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7120 --- Comment #4 from Pol Hallen 2014-05-05 19:15:42 UTC --- Hi all and thanks for replies, any "stable" way to do rsync with variable bandwidht? Thanks Pol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Bug 10575] Long Delay for Large Folders Even with Incremental File-List

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10575 --- Comment #3 from Haravikk 2014-05-01 19:25:02 UTC --- Actually it seems the specific issue I was seeing was related to --fuzzy and the fact that the destination machine is a NAS (so much slower than my main machine); even though there was no act

[Bug 10580] Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 --- Comment #3 from Vania Toperich 2014-05-01 15:03:25 UTC --- I am using --include-files and list is created automatically. Here is an example: /home/media/Movies/Джек Николсон/Беспечный ездок 1969 /home/media/Movies/Джек Николсон/Беспечный ездо

[Bug 10581] New: --fuzzy-delay and --fuzzy-limit for fuzzy match tuning

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10581 Summary: --fuzzy-delay and --fuzzy-limit for fuzzy match tuning Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

[Bug 10580] Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 Vania Toperich changed: What|Removed |Added Version|3.1.0 |3.1.1 --- Comment #2 from Vania Toperich

[Bug 10580] Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 --- Comment #1 from Vania Toperich 2014-05-01 13:10:53 UTC --- ls -la /home/media/Movies/Джек\ Николсон/Томми\ 1975/ total 1529336 drwxr-xr-x 2 media media 4096 Aug 20 2011 . drwxr-xr-x 14 media media 4096 Mar 13 12:07 .. -r-xr--r-- 1

[Bug 10580] New: Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 Summary: Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: ma

[Bug 10532] Rsync fails with older version.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10532 --- Comment #8 from Roger Wolff 2014-04-30 07:40:41 UTC --- Ah! It is the OLDER version of rsync that is refusing to talk to the newer one. I would always have implemented protocol version compatiblity by having the newer version make the decision

[Bug 10579] New: --xattr internal abbrev error

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10579 Summary: --xattr internal abbrev error Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: c

[Bug 9594] Error transferring user and non-user xattr using --fake-super under Linux

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9594 --- Comment #1 from Kuba Ober 2014-04-30 01:20:39 UTC --- I can reproduce under 3.1.1pre1. The cause of the problem is as follows: Note that the rsync_xa list items contain the xattr name and value *but also* an attribute *index* (num!). 1. The s

[Bug 10507] Structured Output (for Simpler Parsing)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10507 --- Comment #1 from Haravikk 2014-04-29 21:10:41 UTC --- Just wanted to add that simplified parsing of itemised output would be nice too, and also with awareness for the --progress option, i.e; with itemised output enabled a single line for each fi

[Bug 10532] Rsync fails with older version.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10532 --- Comment #7 from John Jacq 2014-04-29 18:58:19 UTC --- Thanks, this does work fine. I've simply aliased rsync to "rsync --protocol=30" in my .bash_aliases file so as not to change my backup scripts. Updating rsync on the remote machine would be

[Bug 10532] Rsync fails with older version.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10532 --- Comment #6 from Wayne Davison 2014-04-29 17:52:49 UTC --- Oops, I meant to say --protocol=30 (not --version). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You ar

[Bug 10575] Long Delay for Large Folders Even with Incremental File-List

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10575 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10532] Rsync fails with older version.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10532 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j...@jacq.info --- Comment #5 from Wayne D

[Bug 10571] Fails to work from machine to machine after upgrade to Kubuntu 14.01

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10571 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10532] Rsync fails with older version.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10532 --- Comment #4 from Wayne Davison 2014-04-29 17:13:13 UTC --- Rsync 2.3.2 refuses to interact with protocol 31. If you wish to tweak 2.3.2 to not be so draconian, please be my guest, but you'd be better off upgrading the hugely ancient rsync inste

[Bug 10575] Long Delay for Large Folders Even with Incremental File-List

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10575 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Korb 2014-04-29 13:18:35 UTC --- What is your command line? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bu

[Bug 10575] New: Long Delay for Large Folders Even with Incremental File-List

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10575 Summary: Long Delay for Large Folders Even with Incremental File-List Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: norm

[Bug 10571] New: Fails to work from machine to machine after upgrade to Kubuntu 14.01

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10571 Summary: Fails to work from machine to machine after upgrade to Kubuntu 14.01 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severi

[Bug 10532] Rsync fails with older version.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10532 --- Comment #3 from Roger Wolff 2014-04-27 10:17:59 UTC --- My arguments for seeing this as a bug are: 1) The rsync version of half a year ago /is/ able to communicate with that old version. 2) The patch comment for the patch that "removed" com

[Bug 10568] New: --copy-links Fails if link name has more than 32 chars

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10568 Summary: --copy-links Fails if link name has more than 32 chars Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority:

[Bug 10567] New: --abort option to halt transfer on error(s)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10567 Summary: --abort option to halt transfer on error(s) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

[Bug 10532] Rsync fails with older version.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10532 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10532] Rsync fails with older version.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10532 --- Comment #1 from rafael.t...@gmail.com 2014-04-24 10:30:42 UTC --- Same error when using Mac OS protocol version mismatch -- is your shell clean? (see the rsync man page for an explanation) rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at compa

[Bug 6590] [sender] could not find xattr #1 for home/jdoe/TheFresh

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6590 --- Comment #4 from Mantas M. 2014-04-24 10:23:21 UTC --- Ah, on the second thought, I'm actually looking for bug 9594... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

[Bug 6590] [sender] could not find xattr #1 for home/jdoe/TheFresh

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6590 Mantas M. changed: What|Removed |Added CC||graw...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Mantas M.

[Bug 8308] rsync: exclude.c:532: change_local_filter_dir: Assertion `dir_depth < 4096/2+1' failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308 Wayne Davison changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #9862|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 8308] rsync: exclude.c:532: change_local_filter_dir: Assertion `dir_depth < 4096/2+1' failed

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8308 --- Comment #9 from Wayne Davison 2014-04-20 21:20:02 UTC --- Created attachment 9863 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=9863 Add some debugging if the prior patch didn't fix anything If there is still a bug, use this patch to add s

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >