Re: .net port
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 04:26:21PM -0600, Alex Pedenko wrote: I wrote a port of rsync to c# / .net. If there is interest in this, I'd be happy to make the code available. The current code will [ .. ] If it's open source, why don't you just make it available on sourceforge.net (or similar), or give it to the rsync guys to dump somewhere on rsync.samba.org? -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: rsync a raw device
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 04:27:08PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 17:42 -0500, Dan Pritts wrote: is there some magic flag i'm missing that will allow me to rsync a raw device? Not the dev entry, but the device itself? I don't know of any such flag, but it would be easy to add one. Perhaps as a special case, if you rsync a single file, and the file is a special file, then assume that the user wants to copy the contents. Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Rsync help needed...
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:45:20AM -0800, lsk wrote: Matt I have strange results to report I transferred 300 oracle datafiles of total 30 GB in size. Using the option rsync -zv --no-whole-file --stats it took 1:15 min and using rsync -cvz options earlier had took 1:25 min so there wasn't much time savings I thought it would be a big difference since the files are there and only little is modified (header info) + additional datafiles. My guess is that the number of files and size dominates; since even for a small change, rsync has to write the entire file. You could try the (unsupported, not included?) --in-place feature, available in a patch somewhere. Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Rsync 2.6.7pre1 is now available
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:02:44PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: --- rsync-2.6.7pre1.orig/rsync.yo +++ rsync-2.6.7pre1/rsync.yo @@ -1014,7 +1018,7 @@ as it is sent to the destination machine, which reduces the amount of data being transmitted -- something that is useful over a slow connection. -Note this this option typically achieves better compression ratios that can +Note this this option typically achieves better compression ratios than can someone got the than-this but missed the double this at the beginning! -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Re: Possibility of merging rsync and tar
Joerg Schilling's s-tar does incremental backups: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/star.html (dunno why that page is 'old' or 'private' but it seemed like the best page off google) Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
