On 16-Mar-2009, at 14:43, Jerome Hollon wrote:
I have this in my rsync.conf
[backup]
path = /home/$USER/backup
use chroot = no
monge symlinks = no
uid = wendell
gid = wendell
read only = no
list = yes
auth users = wendell
secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets
But rsync
Is there a way to be subscribed to this list and NOT get the posts
from samba-b...@samba.org?
According to https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/rsync/lbutler+rs...@covisp.net
I am only subscribed to this list.
--
The Steve is seen, rightly or wrongly, as the visionary, the
On 5-Mar-2009, at 16:27, Peter Salameh wrote:
One of the speed-limiting issues with rsync is having to send huge
file lists when mirroring large file systems, even for incremental
updates where only a small part of the file system might have
changed. My proposal is to first send a checksum
On 4-Mar-2009, at 06:45, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 04 Mar 2009, David de Lama wrote:
I tested what happens with a file which is saved at a FAT32
partition and then this partition is converted to NTFS.
So first I transfered the file with rsync from the FAT32 partition
to my Linux /home
On 3-Mar-2009, at 20:33, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 08:58 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 3/3/2009 8:52 AM, m...@bortal.de wrote:
unfortunatelly rsync is beeing REALLY slow and produces a high
load when
we try to sync lots of files (250 000 small files).
What version of rsync
On 27-Feb-2009, at 21:16, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 08:20 -0500, Mag Gam wrote:
it works. But takes hours to do it. Was wondering if there was a
faster way
How much speed do u get to backup these files? Average?
I would thing that rsync 3.x would make a large difference on
On 23-Feb-2009, at 01:27, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
Presently I have the latest full backup in a 'current' directory and
30
day incrementals in '-MM-DD' format directories. Without changing
that directory structure I'd like the '-DD-MM' directories to
contain the full system
On 16-Feb-2009, at 01:18, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:08:36AM -0700, lewis butler wrote:
This tells everyone the exact length of each password
The docs should actually say that everything after the first line of
the file is ignored. So, feel free to add any text you like
The man page says:
--password-file
This option allows you to provide a password in a
file for
accessing an rsync daemon. The file must not be world
readable.
It should contain just the password as a single line.
The trouble with this
I'm wondering if I can use link-dest to compare rsync to a remote
directory.
rsync -aCHh --stats --link-dest=akane::backup/ranma.daily.1 /
myserver::akane/ranma.daily.0
Something like that? Is it going to work like it does when doing a
local rsync with a local link-dest directory? Is
On 11-Feb-2009, at 14:44, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:12 -0700, lewis butler wrote:
rsync -aCHh --stats --link-dest=akane::backup/ranma.daily.1 /
myserver::akane/ranma.daily.0
rsync -aCHh --stats --link-dest=../ranma.daily.1 \
/ myserver::akane/ranma.daily.0
On 27-Jan-2009, at 06:49, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Tue 27 Jan 2009, Paul Slootman wrote:
No, the data over the wire is compressed with the -z option; not the
file.
Correction: more specifically, the data between the sender and the
receiver processes is compressed.
Unfortunately this also
On 22-Jan-2009, at 02:43, David de Lama wrote:
Hi @all!
I have two questions:
- First, am I right that the chance of getting the same 32-bit
rolling checksum is 1/2^16
Depends on the algorithm. Most 32bit algorithms are not really 1:
(2^16)-1
and to get the same 128-bit MD5 Hash is
On 4-Dec-2008, at 18:12, Ansar Mohammed wrote:
Tried that but its hardcoded to use the rsync.net servers.
Reading the page linked, it appears that the remote server is a SETTING:
URL should be the address of your rsync.net storage system - this
was indicated in your original welcome email.
On 13-Nov-2008, at 14:17, Daniel Jarboe wrote:
I'm currently using rsync and --link-dest to give me something like a
poor-man's incremental snapshot to disk. But I really only want to
generate
a new backup if rsync detects differences, otherwise I don't need a
new
backup.
But with
I'm very confused. I ran this command:
/usr/local/bin/rsync -aCHh --stats --delete-after --delete-excluded \
--exclude=/backup/ --exclude-from=/var/.rexcludes \
/ /backup/daily.0
then I ran these commands
mail ~ $ ls -ls etc/postfix/main.cf
28 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 28322 Jul 27
On 28-Jul-2008, at 08:03, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 12:33 +0200, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
lewis butler wrote:
...
mail ~ $ ls -ls etc/postfix/main.cf
28 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 28322 Jul 27 16:31 /etc/postfix/
main.cf
mail ~ $ ls -ls /backup/daily.0/etc/postfix/main.cf
28 -rw
On 28-Jul-2008, at 11:49, Matt McCutchen wrote:
ah... well, that would be ugly
How so?
Well, there's a lot of them, for one; scattered about the drive in
various places, for two.
You just have to put the appropriate number of ../ in front.
symlinks -c will even do this for you.
On 28-May-2008, at 05:28, David Favor wrote:
/usr/bin/rsync -av --delete --exclude '/src/***'
why all the *?
-exclude=src/ is what I've used in the past
/src/ would imply that src is at the root of your system, which seem
unlikely.
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid
I run an rsync to backup my mail server ever 4 hours. Sometimes, I
get these sorts of warnings:
Rsyncing...
file has vanished: /usr/local/virtual/*munged1*/new/
1210876129.43402_0.mail.server.tld
file has vanished: /usr/local/virtual/*munged2*/courierimapkeywords/.
20 matches
Mail list logo
