https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-26 14:52 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> I may be able to reproduce the original situation.
The original situation is a timeout at the end of all transferred data, not in
the middle
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-26 14:12 ---
I may be able to reproduce the original situation.
I can have a browser and X that are running with 90% load on
CPU 1 and 98% load on CPU 2. Once I have waited for the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-26 01:26 ---
I believe that using this "no-op" packet effectively implements the "keep alive"
option requested in bug 1889 without requiring an explicit option be given.
Nice.
I'm
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 16:07 ---
The CVS code now handles the case where the generator is taking too long between
writes -- it either flushes any buffered data in the output buffer after
timeout/2 secon
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-25 12:53 ---
I've had rsync problems intermittantly in Gentoo.
Gentoo uses rsync within portage package management system.
Typically users run "emerge sync" to update their
portage
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-11 07:38 ---
> Hmm. I've not managed to make it break. I will try "loading" the machines
> while doing the rsyncs and see if that has any effect.
Well. It seems to have no effect
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-11 01:44 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I havn't specified the timeout option, and still get the issue.
>
> I also have double-checked, and reliably suceeed on all the 'straced' bac
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 12:20 ---
I havn't specified the timeout option, and still get the issue.
I also have double-checked, and reliably suceeed on all the 'straced' backups so
far this week.
--
Con
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-10 11:10 ---
I'm glad that it was not just a product of my imagination!
For some reason I havn't been able to reliably reproduce the problem. I pretty
much gave up. I am currently
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|RE
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
13 matches
Mail list logo
