Re: [PATCH] Don't (wrongly) retouch dir permissions with --fake-super.

2009-11-29 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net said: --- generator.c |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Hmm, I've applied this patch on both sides, but I'm still getting the same error. Is this because I'm using fake-super only on one side? # rsync -v

Re: [PATCH] Don't (wrongly) retouch dir permissions with --fake-super.

2009-11-29 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: Hmm, I've applied this patch on both sides, but I'm still getting the same error. The errors should go away on the next run, since rsync should have set u+rwx on the dirs during the most recent run (but it doesn't do it

Re: [PATCH] Don't (wrongly) retouch dir permissions with --fake-super.

2009-11-29 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Wayne Davison way...@samba.org said: On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: Hmm, I've applied this patch on both sides, but I'm still getting the same error. The errors should go away on the next run No, the errors went away when I

[PATCH] Don't (wrongly) retouch dir permissions with --fake-super.

2009-11-28 Thread Matt McCutchen
--- generator.c |7 +-- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/generator.c b/generator.c index 8038feb..4abe6a0 100644 --- a/generator.c +++ b/generator.c @@ -1892,6 +1892,7 @@ static void touch_up_dirs(struct file_list *flist, int ndx) static int counter

Re: [PATCH] Don't (wrongly) retouch dir permissions with --fake-super.

2009-11-28 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.netwrote: diff --git a/generator.c b/generator.c Much appreciated. Applied and tested. ..wayne.. -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: