On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 22:17 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On 10/15/07, Aaron Digulla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is for a production system which goes online Q1 2008. Should I use
the latest stable version of rsync (2.6.9) or will there be a release of
3.0 until then?
Rsync 3.0.0 is in
Hello,
Can you please modify the backup options to work together with
--remove-source-files so I'm able to create a reliable move between
hosts script?
If --backup is specified, the files to be deleted should be renamed on
the source side. If --backup-dir is specified, they should be
On 10/15/07, Aaron Digulla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please modify the backup options to work together with
--remove-source-files so I'm able to create a reliable move between
hosts script?
The patch patches/source-backup.diff in the source tree adds an
option --source-backup to do
On 10/15/07, Aaron Digulla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the input. If this wasn't for a production system, I'd do
that :-) Why don't you apply the patch the release version?
Because the patch is a quick hack to serve a niche need, so the
benefit of saving people who need source backups a
Matt McCutchen schrieb:
In the same way, I encourage you to test and
begin using the source-backup patch now if it suits your needs; if you
want the patch added to the main version, you can help make that more
likely by improving it.
Thanks. I'll try to convince my bosses to see this as
On 10/15/07, Aaron Digulla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I'll try to convince my bosses to see this as payment for
using rsync :-) I just hope I can find a simple way to build rsync on
Windows ... I guess I'll try with Cygwin since I already have that
installed and I could build GhostPCL
