Dave,
Thanks for the clarification, now that part is clear also!
Randy Kramer
Dave Dykstra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 06:57:14PM -0400, David Bolen wrote:
> [very good reply to Randy Kramer deleted]
>
> > > Aside: I think, based on your previous response, that if I did a
> > > multifi
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 06:57:14PM -0400, David Bolen wrote:
[very good reply to Randy Kramer deleted]
> > Aside: I think, based on your previous response, that if I did a
> > multifile rsync (say 60 files), and rsync was interrupted after 20
> > of the files were rsync'd, the --compare-dest opti
David,
Thanks for the response -- now I understand!
I like the idea of the --partial-pad option, but I'm very new to Linux,
haven't compiled anything, and I don't think I could make good use of a
patch. Someday, maybe. (I think the --partial-pad would be a useful
option to people trying to r
Randy Kramer [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
> I'm still uncertain about what happens if a single file rsync is
> interrupted partway through (and I've specified the --partial
> option) -- will rsync take advantage of the old copy of the file in
> --compare-dest and the partially rsync'd file (now tr
Dave,
Thanks very much for the reply!
I'm still uncertain about what happens if a single file rsync is
interrupted partway through (and I've specified the --partial option) --
will rsync take advantage of the old copy of the file in --compare-dest
and the partially rsync'd file (now truncated)
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:53:23AM -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
...
> rsync -a -vv --progress --partial [--compare-dest=] \
> carroll.cac.psu.edu::mandrake-iso/mandrakefreq-i586-20010316.iso \
> mandrakefreq-i586-20010316.iso
...
> In reading about the --compare-dest option, it sounded like I could
