Re: --detect-renamed question

2007-10-13 Thread Greg Siekas
Matt, That was too quick! I think --trust-move is a really good thing and I'll test it out soon. Some thoughts on all this now that I've had my caffeine this morning. It would take one very crafty user to delete a file and create one with the same name, mtime, and size. The only issue I

Re: --detect-renamed question

2007-10-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've started testing the detect-renamed patch with 2.6.9 and soon 3.0.0pre1. I have an unique situation where I'm rsync'ing to a HSM based filesystem. I've found that the detect-renamed patch works but it appears to do a copy of the

Re: --detect-renamed question

2007-10-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On 10/12/07, Greg Siekas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The other option I thought of was to only do the move when the mtime, size, and filename match. Not really a 'detect-renamed' but a 'detected-moved' type operation. That's a good idea, and easy to implement too! I have improved the patch

--detect-renamed question

2007-10-11 Thread radius13a
I've started testing the detect-renamed patch with 2.6.9 and soon 3.0.0pre1. I have an unique situation where I'm rsync'ing to a HSM based filesystem. I've found that the detect-renamed patch works but it appears to do a copy of the file to the new destination. This is particular slow since