On Dec 7, 2006, at 3:44 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
Nope. As snowcrash pointed out in the other thread, you have to
disable
ACLs on OS X to get it to compile. I'm hoping that someone will be
able
to write a compatibility layer before too long. I'll take a crack
at it
eventually if someone
Sorry I haven't looked into this, but atm I just don't have the time.
thanks for the update. personally, atm, i'd love to see just HEAD's
mtime (finished?) support rolled into a 'official;' rsync release.
It also seems like any solution will necessarily drop information.
osx keeps track of
On Dec 5, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:16:34PM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
Sorry, but this patch can't be applied to 2.6.9 patched with acl
patch:
The patch applies fine without even a wimper. Make sure that your
version doesn't have its white-space
before being warned-off ACLs on osx, this had been part of my issue,
addresed in an earlier thread here,
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-November/016788.html
i'd found these symbols originate in libacl (e.g., cref
On Dec 6, 2006, at 6:56 PM, snowcrash wrote:
before being warned-off ACLs on osx, this had been part of my issue,
addresed in an earlier thread here,
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-November/016788.html
i'd found these symbols originate in libacl (e.g., cref
ACL support for OS X would be - well, - mighty fine, as ACLs for OS X
Server (10.4) are quite useful and many are using them.
Here's hoping for the best !
one would think that Apple would be working on the issue, but i've
found that the discussion about it, well, 'wanders' a bit. and, as
On Dec 6, 2006, at 7:49 PM, snowcrash wrote:
ACL support for OS X would be - well, - mighty fine, as ACLs for OS X
Server (10.4) are quite useful and many are using them.
Here's hoping for the best !
one would think that Apple would be working on the issue, but i've
found that the discussion
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:30:24PM -0500, david wrote:
Sadly, this still does not compile.
Nope. As snowcrash pointed out in the other thread, you have to disable
ACLs on OS X to get it to compile. I'm hoping that someone will be able
to write a compatibility layer before too long. I'll take
Wayne Davison пишет:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:37:10AM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
Internal error: wrong write used in receiver.
If you google for this string, the very first item in the search results
is this thread that has my reply (which contains a patch):
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 01:16:34PM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
Sorry, but this patch can't be applied to 2.6.9 patched with acl patch:
The patch applies fine without even a wimper. Make sure that your
version doesn't have its white-space mangled, or just hand-edit the
changes into the flist.c
Dmitry Melekhov пишет:
Hello!
Without acl patch it works OK,
but if I run
/usr/bin/rsync -A --delete -n -p -r -o -g -t
192.168.72.8:/home/samba/docs/ /BACKUP/BACKUP/LUD/docs -vvv
btw, 2.6.8 works OK
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:37:10AM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
Internal error: wrong write used in receiver.
If you google for this string, the very first item in the search results
is this thread that has my reply (which contains a patch):
On Dec 4, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:37:10AM +0400, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
Internal error: wrong write used in receiver.
If you google for this string, the very first item in the search
results
is this thread that has my reply (which contains a
Hello!
Without acl patch it works OK,
but if I run
/usr/bin/rsync -A --delete -n -p -r -o -g -t
192.168.72.8:/home/samba/docs/ /BACKUP/BACKUP/LUD/docs -vvv
received 14889 names
done
recv_file_list done
get_local_name count=14889 /BACKUP/BACKUP/LUD/docs
recv_files(14889) starting
14 matches
Mail list logo
