https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
--- Comment #13 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-12 22:16 CST ---
I rediscovered this bug just now and thought I would comment on what happened
so it doesn't stand as a blemish on the community.
Wayne and Egmont disagreed on the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-16 04:52 MST ---
I do agree that there are cirsumstances when fuzzy doesn't speed up things,
or actually causes huge performance regression. On the other hand, as I
described, there are
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-15 10:27 MST ---
I appreciate than in your specific circumstance that an enhance behavior of
--fuzzy would be useful. My testing of the --fuzzy option has also included
large transfers with
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-14 05:46 MST ---
Dear Wayne,
To comment #8:
If you'd say it's too hard to fix it, we have no resources to implement
this or something similar, then I'd most likely accept it. But your
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-13 11:20 MST ---
One way to manualy optimize a transfer for a new directory that is related to
an old directory is to first copy the old directory using --link-dest, and then
copy the new
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-15 08:19 MST ---
Nice. It occurs to me that maybe the first call to do_stat should be changed
to link_stat(dest_path, st, keep_dirlinks) in order to obey --keep-dirlinks
when finding the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-10 17:22 MST ---
This behavior is a consequence of the strange logic in get_local_name in
main.c. If the destination path is given as a file, then rsync uses a local
name and accesses the
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-10 17:22 MST ---
Created an attachment (id=1661)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1661action=view)
main.c from my custom rsync, showing rewritten get_local_name
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
