Matt McCutchen (m...@mattmccutchen.net) wrote on 31 May 2009 23:11:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 07:10 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 14:34 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
And one more thing here:
If you are going to prepare this batch file, it seems there will be
double the
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 10:15:27AM -0300, Carlos Carvalho wrote:
In this case rsync automatically uses --whole-file. Will it do the
same in the case of --only-write-batch?
The default is always --no-whole-file when writing a batch.
..wayne..
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid
Dear Wayne,
Excellent, that's really what I have expected!
Is it stable now? Cause I have found that this feature seems to be
unstable before ver 3.0.6.
- Fixed a --read-batch hang when rsync is reading a batch file that was
created from an incremental-recursion transfer.
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 17:08 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote:
Dear Wayne,
Excellent, that's really what I have expected!
Is it stable now? Cause I have found that this feature seems to be
unstable before ver 3.0.6.
- Fixed a --read-batch hang when rsync is reading a batch file that was
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 14:34 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
And one more thing here:
If you are going to prepare this batch file, it seems there will be
double the workload of network, see below statements? Is that right?
rsync -av --only-write-batch=/batches/$DATE
bhost:/backup2/
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 07:10 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 14:34 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
And one more thing here:
If you are going to prepare this batch file, it seems there will be
double the workload of network, see below statements? Is that right?
rsync -av
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 23:11 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 07:10 +0800, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-31 at 14:34 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
And one more thing here:
If you are going to prepare this batch file, it seems there will
be
double the workload of
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:32:16AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
- Each day, generate a reverse batch (by running rsync in the reverse
direction with --only-write-batch) and then update the destination file.
In order to avoid any inconsistency between the files when the reverse
run is done and
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 21:58 +, Frank Harmann wrote:
i am new to rsync and i want to use rsync to emulate rdiff behaviour
(because i can't install rdiff on the system).
What i would like rsync to do is to generate a diff file (like with
rsync --write-batch) but WITHOUT changing the
Hi,
i am new to rsync and i want to use rsync to emulate rdiff behaviour (because i
can't install rdiff on the system).
What i would like rsync to do is to generate a diff file (like with rsync
--write-batch) but WITHOUT changing the destination file.
This would allow me to store daily
10 matches
Mail list logo
