On 7 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see a lot of messages have RSYNC_NAME ":" put on the beginning, including
> FINFO messages. I really don't think they belong on FINFO messages at
> all. I looked into it because I noticed it printing a symlink prefaced by
> "rsync:" whi
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:23:34AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2002, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > > Martin has put in the below feature in rsync 2.5.2 for using a shell. I've
> > > already had one user complain about it. I th
I guess the argument about not breaking scripts also applies to
Wayne's otherwise good suggestion of showing file sizes in -v output.
--
Martin
On 30 Jan 2002, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > Martin has put in the below feature in rsync 2.5.2 for using a shell. I've
> > already had one user complain about it. I think it would be better at the
> > -vv level.
>
> Yes, I agree that -
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> Martin has put in the below feature in rsync 2.5.2 for using a shell. I've
> already had one user complain about it. I think it would be better at the
> -vv level.
Yes, I agree that -vv would be better. People use -v primarily to see
what files are ge
Martin has put in the below feature in rsync 2.5.2 for using a shell. I've
already had one user complain about it. I think it would be better at the
-vv level. It also has occurred to me that there are probably scripts that
are parsing the verbose output of rsync that may get confused by this.
