Re: Should posters be required to join the list? (was: Bad habits)

2009-02-16 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:29:11AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: I have decided that we'll try running the list that way and see how we like it Sadly, the rejection mails are way too cryptic to be useful. I will ask the samba folks if they will consider upgrading to a newer version of mailman

Re: Should posters be required to join the list? (was: Bad habits)

2009-02-14 Thread Wayne Davison
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:47:29PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: I'm shifting my position on this issue because I've seen several problems that would be solved by requiring posters to join the list: I have decided that we'll try running the list that way and see how we like it: Non-member

Re: Should posters be required to join the list? (was: Bad habits)

2009-01-22 Thread macuserfr
Le 22 janv. 09 à 04:47, Matt McCutchen a écrit : On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 11:52 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: Why are non members even allowed to post to the list? Why shouldn't they be? In my view, subscription to the list just indicates a personal preference to receive all the mail because

Should posters be required to join the list? (was: Bad habits)

2009-01-21 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 11:52 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: Why are non members even allowed to post to the list? Why shouldn't they be? In my view, subscription to the list just indicates a personal preference to receive all the mail because one wishes to either help others or stay informed