* If you use --delete-before or --delete-during, rsync will delete FOO
as extraneous and then copy foo. The overall effect is to
(inefficiently) update the case of destination files, which may be
desirable. If you change the case of a destination file by hand to work
around case sloppiness in a
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 01:32 -0400, Aaron Davies wrote:
How does this work on OS X/HFS+ (case-preserving, but
case-insensitive)? Any issues with the standard build in a mixed-OS
scenario like this?
The standard version should work mostly fine on a case-insensitive,
case-preserving filesystem.
On 5/15/2008 7:18 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:39:03PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
Wayne, do you have a comment about the inclusion of --ignore-case?
I don't particularly like the option, so my current inclination is to
just keep it available in the patches directory
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:54 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/15/2008 7:18 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
I don't particularly like the option, so my current inclination is to
just keep it available in the patches directory for those that want it.
Hi Wayne,
I hope you don't mind a
On 5/16/2008, Matt McCutchen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
To some degree I can see Wayne's rationale for not including
--ignore-case in the main version of rsync. Officially, rsync targets
only Unix-like systems, not Windows, though OS-specific compatibility
changes/features are fair game for
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:54 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/15/2008 7:18 PM, Wayne Davison wrote:
I don't particularly like the option, so my current inclination is to
just keep it available in the patches directory
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 16:47 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 5/15/2008 4:31 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 10:55 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Did [the --ignore-case] patch get included in the new 3.0.x standard
version?
No.
O-k... bummer. I thought it was
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:39:03PM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
Wayne, do you have a comment about the inclusion of --ignore-case?
I don't particularly like the option, so my current inclination is to
just keep it available in the patches directory for those that want it.
..wayne..
--
Please
Rather than waiting for the ignore case patch to be added to the
standard rsync,
One big reason I pinged the list (and you and Wayne) is to be the
'squeaky wheel' - I'm hoping this doesn't fall through the cracks and
actually does make it into the 3.0 release... otherwise, I'll have to
keep
On 7/30/07, Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rather than waiting for the ignore case patch to be added to the
standard rsync, I suggest you get your own copy of rsync with that
patch in one of these two ways:
1. Set up a full Cygwin installation ( http://www.cygwin.com/ ), get
the
On 7/31/07, Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Addendum: I have been in touch with Tevfik Karagülle
[EMAIL PROTECTED], the cwRsync author, about what users like you who
want patched versions of cwRsync should do. He says you can just
compile your own rsync.exe as in alternative #1 and
Matt McCutchen, on 7/20/2007 10:28 AM, said the following:
On 7/20/07, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Wayne,
Just checking to see if this is in the official tree yet?
It isn't. Wayne, perhaps you have a further comment about when it will be.
Wayne?
Thanks,
--
Best regards,
On 5/2/07, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm very interested in learning the status of the --ignorecase patch
being included in the main tree... is there a reason it still isn't in
there?
For anyone who is forced to dealing with backing up windows boxes, this
is a big problem, and
Wayne Davison, on 5/4/2007 12:11 PM, said the following:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:01:20PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
I'm very interested in learning the status of the --ignorecase patch
being included in the main tree...
My currently plan is to include that functionality in 3.0.0. I've
On 7/20/07, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Wayne,
Just checking to see if this is in the official tree yet?
It isn't. Wayne, perhaps you have a further comment about when it will be.
Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:01:20PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
I'm very interested in learning the status of the --ignorecase patch
being included in the main tree...
My currently plan is to include that functionality in 3.0.0. I've been
improving the patch in recent weeks, and it will get
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:01:20PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
I'm very interested in learning the status of the --ignorecase patch
being included in the main tree...
My currently plan is to include that functionality in 3.0.0. I've been
improving the patch in recent
That said - you said '3.0', and 'fairly soon'... does that mean that 3.0
will be the next major release?
To clarify... will the next version be 2.7, or 3.0?
Thanks again!
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 03:27:18PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
That said - you said '3.0', and 'fairly soon'... does that mean that
3.0 will be the next major release?
Yes, 3.0.0 is what is being worked on in CVS (as mentioned on the rsync
web page). You can check it out via the repository or
On 5/4/07, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said - you said '3.0', and 'fairly soon'... does that mean that 3.0
will be the next major release?
To clarify... will the next version be 2.7, or 3.0?
The next release will be 3.0.0. While Wayne may incorporate the
ignore-case patch
Hi,
I'm very interested in learning the status of the --ignorecase patch
being included in the main tree... is there a reason it still isn't in
there?
For anyone who is forced to dealing with backing up windows boxes, this
is a big problem, and I can't believe that it isn't affecting a lot
21 matches
Mail list logo
