Re: Status of upcoming 2.6.0 release

2003-12-29 Thread Wayne Davison
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 02:04:47AM +, John Poltorak wrote: > Is there any chance of including [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ in Makefile.in? I committed that change last January, so it should already be in the 2.5.6 and 2.5.7 releases. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.o

Re: Status of upcoming 2.6.0 release

2003-12-29 Thread John Poltorak
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:32:53PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > The changes made to 2.6.0pre1 have been pretty minor so far, so I had > been debating whether we needed a pre2 release or not. I finally > decided to go ahead and release what little there is, just to give > folks a final opportunity

Re: Status of upcoming 2.6.0 release

2003-12-29 Thread Paul Slootman
I just noticed this in the rsyncd.conf manpage: .SH "VERSION" This man page is current for version 2\&.0 of rsync I'm sure that this can be updated to 2.6.0 :-) Paul Slootman -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.cat

Re: Status of upcoming 2.6.0 release

2003-12-28 Thread jw schultz
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 02:06:59PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:48:40PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > > Sounds good to me. Should this be sent to rsync-announce? > > I had been assuming that just the announcement of the final 2.6.0 > release would go to rsync-announce, bu

Re: Status of upcoming 2.6.0 release

2003-12-28 Thread Wayne Davison
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:48:40PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > Sounds good to me. Should this be sent to rsync-announce? I had been assuming that just the announcement of the final 2.6.0 release would go to rsync-announce, but apparently there is a precedence for announcing pre-releases there as w

Re: Status of upcoming 2.6.0 release

2003-12-28 Thread jw schultz
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 01:32:53PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > The changes made to 2.6.0pre1 have been pretty minor so far, so I had > been debating whether we needed a pre2 release or not. I finally > decided to go ahead and release what little there is, just to give > folks a final opportunity

Status of upcoming 2.6.0 release

2003-12-28 Thread Wayne Davison
The changes made to 2.6.0pre1 have been pretty minor so far, so I had been debating whether we needed a pre2 release or not. I finally decided to go ahead and release what little there is, just to give folks a final opportunity to double check the final release: http://samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview