Hi Phil,
somewhat offtopic, sorry!
I understand, that moving ACL's from one system to another (with rsync or
any other tool) isn't easy and heavily depending on design decisions /
standardization ... Thank you for rambling :-)
As stated in a mail before I'm trying to combine samba and rsync to
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (bcc: Tim
Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject: Re: any news about rsync and acl's?
Classification:
On 12 Jul 2001, "Obergehrer, Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Martin Pool wrote:
> On 12 Jul 2001, "Obergehrer, Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anybody know if rsync can be used in a way to preserve the ACL's?
> > If not, are there plans to implement it in the near future?
> > If not, are there other tools which can handle ACL's when
> > synch
On 12 Jul 2001, "Obergehrer, Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody know if rsync can be used in a way to preserve the ACL's?
> If not, are there plans to implement it in the near future?
> If not, are there other tools which can handle ACL's when
> synchronizing?
I don't know if ther
PM|
|||
|+>
>|
||
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| cc: (bcc: Noel L Yap)|
| Subject: any news about r
Hi,
we're using the newest samba version's features to implement a more fine
grained control of samba shares. I.e. ACL's (on Solaris) are used to map
parts of the Windows permissions.
The shares are synchronized via rsync to other servers. After synchronizing,
the Solaris ACL's are lost and only
