On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:25:05PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
> > A general-purpose RSYNC_OPTS variable would be more tasteful. I think
> > popt makes supporting this fairly straightforward.
>
> That's a nice idea. One area we'll want to be careful of i
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:56:38PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > Of the proposed alternatives, I like this latter the best, changing
> > --non-blocking-io to --no-blocking-io.
>
> Cool. I like that one as well. Here's an implementation. This patch
>
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
> A general-purpose RSYNC_OPTS variable would be more tasteful. I think
> popt makes supporting this fairly straightforward.
That's a nice idea. One area we'll want to be careful of is how the two
options interact.
For instance, we want to support old scr
On 6 Feb 2002, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool. I like that one as well. Here's an implementation. This patch
> adds the configure option --with(out)-blocking-io and defines a new
> variable that gets put into config.h: DEFAULT_BLOCKING_IO.
OK, that's good. Thanks.
> The c
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> Of the proposed alternatives, I like this latter the best, changing
> --non-blocking-io to --no-blocking-io.
Cool. I like that one as well. Here's an implementation. This patch
adds the configure option --with(out)-blocking-io and defines a new
variabl
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:38:04PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
> > OK, I agree --with-rsh should go in, but I think putting magic
> > characters into it is needlessly confusing. I would feel much better
> > about a separate configure option to set the defa
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Martin Pool wrote:
> OK, I agree --with-rsh should go in, but I think putting magic
> characters into it is needlessly confusing. I would feel much better
> about a separate configure option to set the default O_NONBLOCK mode.
The complicating factor then becomes: how does th
On 30 Jan 2002, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A while back I argued for adding a --with-rsh=CMD option to configure
> and got some general agreement that it would be a good thing (especially
> for systems that don't have rsh at all). However, the changes were
> never integrated into
I see that Martin agreed to put it in:
http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2001-July/004554.html
but it must have dropped off his priority list.
- Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:11:50AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> A while back I argued for adding a --with-rsh=CMD option to co
A while back I argued for adding a --with-rsh=CMD option to configure
and got some general agreement that it would be a good thing (especially
for systems that don't have rsh at all). However, the changes were
never integrated into rsync.
This patch adds the --with-rsh=CMD option to configure an
10 matches
Mail list logo
