Re: patch against manpage

2003-03-12 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:55:55PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Wed 12 Mar 2003, jw schultz wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:27:32PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: > > > This is a patch against the manpage to clarify what the --perm option > > > does and does not do. > > > > If we are going

Re: patch against manpage

2003-03-12 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 12 Mar 2003, jw schultz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:27:32PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: > > This is a patch against the manpage to clarify what the --perm option > > does and does not do. > > If we are going to embellish this description it would be > good to make it clear that the

Re: patch against manpage

2003-03-12 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 01:27:32PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: > This is a patch against the manpage to clarify what the --perm option > does and does not do. If we are going to embellish this description it would be good to make it clear that the behavior of rsync in this regard is the same as th

patch against manpage

2003-03-12 Thread Paul Slootman
This is a patch against the manpage to clarify what the --perm option does and does not do. Paul Slootman diff -ru orig/rsync-2.5.6/rsync.1 rsync-2.5.6/rsync.1 --- orig/rsync-2.5.6/rsync.12003-01-28 04:11:57.0 +0100 +++ rsync-2.5.6/rsync.1 2003-03-07 12:18:19.0 +0100 @@ -562,8