https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14463
--- Comment #4 from Wayne Davison ---
The pre-release patches aren't guaranteed to be backward compatible, and in
this case the bits that were used in a couple different patches actually
conflicted with each other. So, when --atimes was promoted
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14463
--- Comment #3 from bumkick...@yahoo.com ---
It's not a trivial exercise to upgrade the rsync version on the target system,
so it would be useful if there was some kind of "back patch" available
| suspect there might be others with similar issues
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14463
--- Comment #2 from bumkick...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to Wayne Davison from comment #1)
What should we do instead to keep the same functionality?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
--
Please use
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14463
Wayne Davison changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14463
Bug ID: 14463
Summary: rsync 3.2.2 server protocol error
Product: rsync
Version: 3.2.0
Hardware: All
OS: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 06:44:20PM +0100, Giuliano Procida wrote:
(Server) Protocol versions: remote=7680, negotiated=30
protocol version mismatch -- is your shell clean?
This will be fixed in the next version. Until then, you can work around
the problem by supplying a . after the host: arg:
Hi.
Two different hosts with 3.0.4 compiled from source, no patches.
It seems fine except that -s causes protocol failures. See below.
Local host is Sparc (Solaris 5.8), remote is Sparc (Solaris 5.10) or i686 Linux.
Regards,
Giuliano.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/userX/tools/bin/rsync -v -v -v -v
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 18:44 +0100, Giuliano Procida wrote:
Two different hosts with 3.0.4 compiled from source, no patches.
It seems fine except that -s causes protocol failures. See below.
I can reproduce this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ rsync -n . localhost:
skipping directory .
[EMAIL
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5075
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5075
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-12 00:14 CST ---
Created an attachment (id=2963)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2963action=view)
Diffs to fix bug
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5075
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-12 00:17 CST ---
Sorry, I meant to add this too:
There is also an uninitialized variable in readfd_buffered that can cause
garbage to be read independently of the bug in mplex_write. Under
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1792
Summary: doing directory only rsync causes an rsync protocol
error
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1792
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
/ ' also:
# rsync -ax --showtogo --stats --exclude /Volumes/ / /Volumes/System
But I get a protocol error (broken pipe) in io.c. When copying all the
subdirectories manually, everything works, so I think he tries toa void a
cyclic copy.
(I'm using rsync 2.5.5, or rather rsyncx 1.7d, a special
rsync the parameters -x for one-file-system, and
'--exclude /Volumes/ ' also:
# rsync -ax --showtogo --stats --exclude /Volumes/ / /Volumes/System
But I get a protocol error (broken pipe) in io.c. When copying all the
A broken pipe means that the process on the other end of the
pipe died
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 12:02:35PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently upgraded one of my servers to 2.5.0. Since then, I've been
getting error messages like following between 2.5.0 and 2.4.6 servers.
bit length overflow
code 3 bits 7-6
code 10 bits 5-6
Does
16 matches
Mail list logo
