hi
We have a box here connected to an antenna receiving rather large
amounts of metheorological data from a satellite. the data is received
and ransferred to another box and removed from the receiving server. I
first thought of using rsync for this, but it seems --remove-source-
files has
On Wed 03 Jun 2009, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
We have a box here connected to an antenna receiving rather large
amounts of metheorological data from a satellite. the data is received
and ransferred to another box and removed from the receiving server. I
first thought of using rsync
On 3. juni. 2009, at 12.34, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 03 Jun 2009, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
We have a box here connected to an antenna receiving rather large
amounts of metheorological data from a satellite. the data is
received
and ransferred to another box and removed from the
On Wed 03 Jun 2009, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
I would solve this not using rsync, but by writing the active file in a
separate directory, or by first writing to a special filename and
renaming when done (like firefox adds .part to the filename while it
is
still downloading it).
Why not
On 3. juni. 2009, at 18.16, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 03 Jun 2009, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
I would solve this not using rsync, but by writing the active file
in a
separate directory, or by first writing to a special filename and
renaming when done (like firefox adds .part to the
On Wed 03 Jun 2009, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
On 3. juni. 2009, at 18.16, Paul Slootman wrote:
Because checking whether a process has a file open can be very costly
in
system resources.
Not really. I'm writing some code doing this now. It will be Linux
Well, it's not something to do
On 3. juni. 2009, at 19.31, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Wed 03 Jun 2009, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
On 3. juni. 2009, at 18.16, Paul Slootman wrote:
Because checking whether a process has a file open can be very
costly
in
system resources.
Not really. I'm writing some code doing this now.
