Re: rsync-3.0.6 prints file list generation time wrong ???

2009-05-31 Thread Carlos Carvalho
Wayne Davison (way...@samba.org) wrote on 30 May 2009 10:12: On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:29:22PM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: Does that mean rsync traversed complete 1000k files in 0.671 seconds? Rsync uses an incremental recursion scan by default, so when that is active the time mentioned is

Re: rsync-3.0.6 prints file list generation time wrong ???

2009-05-30 Thread Wayne Davison
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:29:22PM +0530, Jignesh Shah wrote: Does that mean rsync traversed complete 1000k files in 0.671 seconds? Rsync uses an incremental recursion scan by default, so when that is active the time mentioned is just for the getting-started part of the scan. I've been thinking

Re: rsync-3.0.6 prints file list generation time wrong ???

2009-05-30 Thread Jignesh Shah
Big thanks Wayne, then could you tell me what the while loop in flist.c::send_file_list does between calculation of file generation time (given below)? The while loop generates the complete flist. Isn't it? gettimeofday(start_tv, NULL); . . while (1) {

rsync-3.0.6 prints file list generation time wrong ???

2009-05-29 Thread Jignesh Shah
Hi, While researching on where rsync-3.0.6 spending more time when we have huge number of files in directory(~1000K files). I got below statistics: 2009/05/28 19:05:38 [9660] building file list . . . 2009/05/28 21:40:09 [9660] Number of files: 724591 2009/05/28 21:40:09 [9660] Number of