On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 11:05, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Donovan Baarda wrote:
>
> > For the record, librsync version 0.9.6 is _almost_ ready in CVS. A bug
> >
> >has been detected but not isolated yet for large files (2G+). If it's
> >not squashed soon I'm tempted to release anyway with a KNOWN_BUGS
Donovan Baarda wrote:
For the record, librsync version 0.9.6 is _almost_ ready in CVS. A bug
has been detected but not isolated yet for large files (2G+). If it's
not squashed soon I'm tempted to release anyway with a KNOWN_BUGS that
reports this.
Donovan,
I am just looking around for hints o
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 14:25, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 8 Jun 2003, Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The "next big thing" in delta calculation is probably going to be the
> > vcdiff encoding format, which should allow a common delta format for
> > various applications and supports "se
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:13:48PM +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:21 pm, Martin Pool wrote:
> > I guess the reason why you're interested in doing it is so that you
> > can browse public rsync mirrors from Konqueror/whatever?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:02 pm, Stefan Nehlsen wrote:
> Some time ago I found a patched rsync with slp-support. I think it
> was on the openslp site and was a demonstration for the use of slp.
>
> As server it announced its modules to an slp-server and a
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 06:13:48PM +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:21 pm, Martin Pool wrote:
> > I guess the reason why you're interested in doing it is so that you
> > can browse public rsync mirrors from Konqueror/whatever?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:21 pm, Martin Pool wrote:
> I guess the reason why you're interested in doing it is so that you
> can browse public rsync mirrors from Konqueror/whatever?
Yep. Also, I was playing with the idea of rsync with Service Location Prot
On 8 Jun 2003, Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "next big thing" in delta calculation is probably going to be the
> vcdiff encoding format, which should allow a common delta format for
> various applications and supports "self-referencing delta's", which
> makes it capable of compr
On 9 Jun 2003, Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:43 pm, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > The comments about rsync never using libhsync/librsync are still true
> > for the foreseeable future. There are many things rsync includes that
> > are still missing from l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:43 pm, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> The comments about rsync never using libhsync/librsync are still true
> for the foreseeable future. There are many things rsync includes that
> are still missing from librsync, and the rsync implemen
On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 00:31, Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> I'm interested in these very questions (librsync-rsync relationship,
> remaining limitations of rsync, active prospects for ground-up rewrites),
> Google searches for rsync info have proved a little too vague due to the
> programs ubiquity. Much
I'm interested in these very questions (librsync-rsync relationship,
remaining limitations of rsync, active prospects for ground-up rewrites),
Google searches for rsync info have proved a little too vague due to the
programs ubiquity. Much has certainly changed since this was written,
could some pe
12 matches
Mail list logo
