Re: --no-detach option?

On 21 Nov 2001, Jos Backus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 08:54:18AM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: Here's a patch, based on Max Bowsher's patch. If deemed useful I will supply the man patch as well. --no-detach patch committed. -- Martin

rsync2.5.1pre3 released

rsync://samba.org/rsyncftp/preview/ rsync 2.5.1 (sometime in 2001?) ENHANCEMENTS: * --progress and -P now show estimated data transfer rate (in a multiple of bytes/s) and estimated time to completion. Based on a patch by Rik Faith. * --no-detach option, required

problem uploading to an rsync server

For some reason I'm having a problem uploading to an rsync server: [root@csa i386]# rsync -azvv --progress --stats /home/www/www.blah.com/* blah@localhost::test/ Password: building file list ... done ERROR: module is read only unexpected EOF in read_timeout It claims my module is read only,

Re: problem uploading to an rsync server

These are two redhat machines, running 6.2. server side error in systlog: Dec 5 12:11:25 geo rsyncd[15335]: rsync to test/ from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (192.168.0.50) Dec 5 12:11:25 geo rsyncd[15335]: transfer interrupted (code 1) at main.c(401) This is the error not going over stunnel. Thanks

Re: {rsync} problem uploading to an rsync server

On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:05:19PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote: It claims my module is read only, but it is not: [test] uid = root gid = root path = /home/www/www.blah.com-test comment = this is a test auth users = blah secrets file =

Re: {rsync} problem uploading to an rsync server

AHH, thank you very much! -jeremy On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, M. Drew Streib wrote: On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 03:05:19PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote: It claims my module is read only, but it is not: [test] uid = root gid = root path =

Prefs for rsync of ssh or stunnel?

We're looking at using rsync over an encrypted link, and are debating the virtues of ssh vs stunnel. I know rsync can hammer a network-layer implementation, so have others done this, and if so, which is better - rsync over ssh or rsync over stunnel? I leaning towards stunnel as it's just a pure

Re: problem uploading to an rsync server

On 5 Dec 2001, Jeremy Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's set to localhost because this is going over an stunnel. Yes, I did try it without the stunnel and same results. How can I debug this. This is 2.4.6 on both sides because 2.5.0 just fails completely for uploading and

Re: Netware modify bit changed

On 5 Dec 2001 at 15:02, Martin Pool wrote: Date sent: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 15:02:34 +1100 From: Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Juan J. L?pez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copies to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Netware modify bit

move rsync development tree to BitKeeper?

Andrew and I thought it might be an interesting experiment to move rsync to using BitKeeper rather than CVS for source code control. For a project with rsync's size and activity CVS is actually fine, but it would be a nice toe in the water with BitKeeper to get some practical experience before

Re:

Title: FREE AUCTION SITE! BUY SELL AND TRADE FOR FREE! FREE AUCTION SITE! BUY SELL AND TRADE FOR FREE! Check out the most recent #1 rated NEW online auction! This is where you get to sell all of your items for FREE!