Re: rsync processes never die

2002-03-11 Thread Scott Russell
Martin - Thanks. I'll grab it and give it a try. -- Scott On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:54:41PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > On 7 Mar 2002, Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm using rsync 2.5.2 but have seen this with 2.5.1. My system is Red Hat > > 7.2 with the current errata upda

Re: rsync processes never die

2002-03-11 Thread Scott Russell
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 01:54:41PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > On 7 Mar 2002, Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm using rsync 2.5.2 but have seen this with 2.5.1. My system is Red Hat > > 7.2 with the current errata updates. Using rsyncd with xinetd it seems as if > > old processe

Question on the using of --delete option with rsync

2002-03-11 Thread Andy Lam
Greetings, I have searched through most of the rsync FAQ and can't find any similar cases. I'm hoping someone in this mailing list may have done it in the past and can shred lights on me. First of all, I am not new to "rsync" and we have been using it to move/mirror data across our internal net

Ich bin z. Zt. im Urlaub

2002-03-11 Thread Dirk . Nitka
Ich werde ab 11.03.2002 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 25.03.2002. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Herrn Heinz Maier, [EMAIL PROTECTED] . (0211/61078-50) -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.or

Question on using rsync delete option

2002-03-11 Thread Andy Lam
Greeting. I'm so sorry that I launched the previous email by mistake and before I had a chance to complete it. Here is the summary of my previous question. We would like to use rsync to mirror the contents from our internal staging server ( A) to the external website (B) at our ISP without del

Re: [PATCH][RFC] space saving incrementals

2002-03-11 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:45:04PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > I like link-dest, and the "-" for exclude-from/include-from was already > > something I was planning to add one of these days along with the > > --files-from option I sti

Rsync2.5.3

2002-03-11 Thread Jennifer Lu
Hi, I tried to compile rsync2.5.3 on my Solaris5.5.1 and Solaris5.8 machines, I got the following errors: On Solaris5.5.1, I got: gunbelt# ./configure configure: loading cache /dev/null configure: Configuring rsync 2.5.3 checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.5.1 checking host syste

Re: [PATCH][RFC] space saving incrementals

2002-03-11 Thread jw schultz
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:41:07PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:45:04PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote: > > > I like link-dest, and the "-" for exclude-from/include-from was already > > > something I was planning

zlib 1.1.4 is out (was: Re: Patch: update zlib/* to 1.1.3)

2002-03-11 Thread Jos Backus
I wrote: > > Hopefully they will accept your patch and there will be a 1.1.4 release, > > which also incorporates the infblock.c fixes. It would be bad to have > > different (broken) versions of zlib out there when this can easily be > > avoided. http://www.gzip.org/zlib/ says Version 1.1.4

Re: Compiling on a Cobalt RaQ1

2002-03-11 Thread Martin Pool
On 11 Mar 2002, Jurrie Overgoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 'lo, > > After a long search through the archives I got my awnser. It seams that the > glibc package that comes with RH5.2 (with the Cobalt RaQ1 is based on) is > broken. I need to upgrade... > > Now the sh*tty part: > To compile rsync

Re: Question on using rsync delete option

2002-03-11 Thread tim . conway
Through what method might rsync determine whether a file on the destination is from the source and since deleted, or created on the destination, when even you have no way of knowing. You would need a complete history of both filesystems, every create, rename, move, insert, delete, append, and

Re: zlib 1.1.4 is out (was: Re: Patch: update zlib/* to 1.1.3)

2002-03-11 Thread Martin Pool
It seems the patch we merged into rsync 2.5.3 is not correct and -z is not reliable. I'll do another release shortly. -- Martin -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: zlib 1.1.4 is out (was: Re: Patch: update zlib/* to 1.1.3)

2002-03-11 Thread Jos Backus
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 10:58:31AM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: > It seems the patch we merged into rsync 2.5.3 is not correct and -z is > not reliable. I'll do another release shortly. So the extra ZFREE() in infblock.c was the culprit: http://cvs.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/zlib/infblock.

Problems with 2.5.3 under Debian Linux

2002-03-11 Thread rsync
I'm having serious problems with the current 2.5.3 release under Debian "testing" and the 2.4.19-pre2 Linux kernel. As you can see from the appended build log, I get many compiler warnings. More seriously, when I install and try to use the resulting binaries over ssh, things bomb horribly, e,g:

Re: Problems with 2.5.3 under Debian Linux

2002-03-11 Thread Martin Pool
On 11 Mar 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm having serious problems with the current 2.5.3 release under > Debian "testing" and the 2.4.19-pre2 Linux kernel. > > As you can see from the appended build log, I get many compiler > warnings. More seriously, when I install and try to use the > resu

Compile error

2002-03-11 Thread Jennifer Lu
Hi, I tried to compile rsync2.5.3 on Solaris5.7, and I still got the same errors as Solaris5.8, can you please help me to look at the problem? I got error messages: Configure was run successfully, then I ran make, I got: "batch.c", line 408: operands have incompatible types: pointer

Re: Problems with 2.5.3 under Debian Linux

2002-03-11 Thread rsync
>Unfortunately the zlib security fix was broken in 2.5.3. I think it's >fixed now in 2.5.4pre1. If you can, please try 2.5.4pre1 and see if >that will fix it; alternatively don't use -z. So far, so good; 2.5.4pre1 seems to work correctly when 2.5.3 did not. Since -z is so widely used, I suggest

Re: Compile error

2002-03-11 Thread Jos Backus
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 08:45:44PM -0800, Jennifer Lu wrote: > I tried to compile rsync2.5.3 on Solaris5.7, and I still > got the same errors as Solaris5.8, can you please help > me to look at the problem? I got error messages: > > Configure was run successfully, then I ran make, > I got: > >