Thanks for your reply Martin.
Here are the results:
[root@Linuxstation tmp]# rsync sheepb.jpg RH72TB::testmodule /tmp
link_stat RH72TB::testmodule : No such file or directory
Regards,
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
Thanks for your reply Greg.
As you suggested, I have typed in:
rsync /tmp/sheepb.jpg RH72TB::testmodule/
and it just does a CR-LF with no errors, but the file is not on the server
hard drive. I wonder where it has gone? :-))
Regards,
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Greg Burley [EMAIL
: Operation not permitted
home/brad/
home/ftp/bin/
home/ftp/etc/
home/ftp/pub/
home/rsyncuser/
failed to set permissions on home : Operation not permitted
home/brad/
wrote 14591 bytes read 40 bytes 4180.29 bytes/sec
total size is 1249200945 speedup is 85380.42
ERROR: chroot failed
I have created
]
path = /home/brad/data/emailbackup
read only = no
uid = root
gid = root
The 7.0 client command:
rsync -avt /home homeserver::home
The emailed log file:
building file list ... done
home/brad/
home/brad/.bash_history
home/brad/Sent
home/brad/Trash
home/sales/
home/sales/Sent
home/sales/Trash
home/brad
= /home/brad/data/emailbackup
read only = no
uid = root
gid = root
The 7.0 client command:
rsync -avt /home homeserver::home
The emailed log file:
building file list ... done
home/brad/
home/brad/.bash_history
home/brad/Sent
home/brad/Trash
home/sales/
home/sales/Sent
home/sales/Trash
home/brad
light on this?
Regards,
Brad
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
if it is some kind of compatibility issue.
Regards,
Brad
On Thu, 16 May 2002 11:56, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Brad wrote:
The command which is run on the client:
rsync -avt /var/spool/mail StorageServer::email
Did you either startup an rsync --daemon manually on the server
Can anyone tell me how to stop the rsync daemon?
Regards,
Brad
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
a worthwhile
solution. There's a lot, so testing is going slowly. Thanks!
Brad Lynch
Info Sys Coordinator
New Pioneer Co-op
Iowa City/Coralville
http://www.newpi.com
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs
just add the /place/where/thelogfiles/arestored .
Just direct the output to a file like that. Nice quick and dirty!
Thanks,
Brad Davis
Cyberport Station
Eric Whiting wrote:
I understand the log-format option for the rsync command:
--log-format=FORMAT log file transfers using
was in doubt after all that: DONT APPLY THIS TO A PRODUCTION BOX.
Any comments - let me know.
Brad
- --
http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in Black.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:03, jw schultz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:38:14AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
The attached patch adds first draft support for service location
protocol, using OpenSLP (http://www.openslp.org). This allows you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 00:38, Brad Hards wrote:
The attached patch adds first draft support for service location
protocol, using OpenSLP (http://www.openslp.org). This allows you to
automagically discover all the rsync servers on your network (which
possibly do some fine grain
control that might help with the loading.
Brad
- --
http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. Tickets booked.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9nK6YW6pHgIdAuOMRAv/8AJoCXzBd0ejM4Dqt
synchronisation,
for I used /home/gregor as my starting-point (starting-directory).
Yes.
Brad
- --
http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. Tickets booked.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
?
Brad
- --
http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. I'm registered. Are you?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9o6k0W6pHgIdAuOMRApLfAJ42Kq1Nx2ycKheex6QxuWbnORlWpQCfTmjq
xkEFiWPWkEZ258aNZUHNE2M=
=7VTr
-END PGP
from the performance problems.
I'm also open to ideas about how to take some advantage of the rsync
capabilities.
If anyone has given any thought to this, I'd be keen to hear from you. Hell,
I'd be appreciative if anyone even noticed.
Brad
- --
http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust
that's going to take, I'm wondering
if anyone has tried this before? Is it un-doable for one reason or another?
Anything is doable, given the source and enough time:)
Probably what you want is Stunnel:
http://www.stunnel.org/
Brad
- --
http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. I'm registered
back together?
Brad
- --
http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. I'm registered. Are you?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9q/t2W6pHgIdAuOMRAsZgAKCEhgLZv8+WsoU/ozE5PwBHu+dyNgCfVq5q
YfHgA7SZa0oGIBtCDRI/ldw
.
I tried to fix it with a simple free(), but according to valgrind, that makes
to leak worse, for reasons I am confused about.
In anycase, does this look like a problem?
Brad
- --
http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. I'm registered. Are you?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
are not
affected from --include files or --delete-excluded
Same here. What does operations mean?
Brad
- --
http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. I'm registered. Are you?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2002/msg01976.html
Brad
- --
http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. I'm registered. Are you?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
doesn't do a real lot, but it should provide a
basis for identifying further work required, including bug fixes :)
Please review and apply.
Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE+T2qBW6pHgIdAuOMRAtsQAJ4ge4dyS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:49, Guy Harris wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 09:40:00PM +1100, Brad Hards wrote:
Please find attached a basic ethereal dissector for the rsync network
(client/server) protocol. I have only lightly tested it.
Checked
at
the compressed copies? (Yes, I realize that there are the additional
(non-network) expenses of decompressing at both ends, and probably
recompressing at the destination.)
There is a better way:
http://pserver.samba.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/rsync/patches/gzip-rsyncable.diff?sortby=rev
Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:51, Chris Hare, CISSP, CISA wrote:
I am still stuck with this problem. Does anyone have any advice?
Have you tried putting it in /etc/rsync/rsyncd.conf?
Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux
on the second
IP address ?
Stop apache, and run rsync --daemon --port=80
What is the issue?
Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE+jV8PW6pHgIdAuOMRAhqkAJ9UZvP+3FGmKjXuyoq5xlMW3AO/mgCeKCqz
ab1XEHZGwNj66pixLWoxFDc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 22:03, Addady wrote:
Hello Bard
Brad. And please don't top quote.
I what apache to use the 1st ip port 80
and rsync use port 973 on the 1st ip and port 80 on the 2nd ip
Use the --address option to rsync. I'm sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 01:18 am, Addady wrote:
Hi,
I know how to handle apache ip and ports in httpd.conf.
My question is regarding setting rsync ip and port.
I'm using xinetd to start rsync. If I will
add --address=2nd_IP_address --port=80
Then
/directories and provide fine grained access control,
if desired.
3. Client side library that doesn't require hellish text parsing, or at least
hides it from you.
4. Well delimited packets, so you can tell when one has been dropped.
Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux
and as client it
asked for location of servers and modules.
That sounds familiar :-
http://zeroconf.sourceforge.net/?selected=demo
There wasn't much reaction when I announced it. Generally it was considered to
be a cool hack, but not of any real usage.
Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
dropped? How can that happen on a
TCP channel?
Why run this _only_ over TCP? Obviously you don't want to re-invent TCP/IP
error handling, but the protocol shouldn't rely on such a system. File
transfer can potentially run connectionless.
Brad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7
what's going on here?
thanks
brad
--
Brad Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Hello,
I have one more tidbit of information that may help.
The source directory was originally copied over to the target directory
with 'cp -pR source dest'.
Thanks,
-Brad Kroeger
Brad Kroeger wrote:
Hello,
I have two identical directories and when I run an rsync --dry-run on
them rsync wants
Here are some suggestions for ftp clients:
ftp
wget
ncftp
all of the above can be scripted and automated to download or upload
specific files.
Regards,
Brad.
On 2 Dec 2005, at 17:25, Marten Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
from a server where neither a rsync daemon nor ssh is running I'm
trying
Hi Zhiyong,
rsync packages for Solaris are available from http://
www.sunfreeware.com/ and its mirrors.
Regards,
Brad
On 15 Dec 2005, at 21:26, Yuan, Zhiyong (Exchange) wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install rsync on Solaris, which I have never tried
before.
Could somebody please tell me
the
data except for them.
Thanks.
Brad Farrell
Brevell Consulting
ph: 403-279-6380
fx: 403-568-2112
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Got a weird thing happening here. Im running rsync
on a windows computer to a windows server over the internet. When I run the
rsync on a full folder (approx 3.5GB, 38k files), rsync sends almost all the
files to the destination server every time. When I rsync individual folders, the
files
written to when rsync is run. will rsync include these partial files in
it's list? i want to avoid the copying of the partial files and obviously
their removal from the source.
source system, is osx, remote is freebsd 6.x
best regards
Brad
-
Brad Miele
IPNstock.com
[EMAIL
Hi All
I am trying to setup my Mac to be an Rsync server for my office PCs. I can’t
seem to find information on how to setup the Mac as the server part. Any ideas?
Brad
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1468 - Release
running.
Any links to good setup docs?
Brad
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1513 - Release Date: 6/22/2008 7:52
AM
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change
I am using the current installation of cygwin on the server end and on about
30 client machines - appears to be a 2.x version of rsync. All appears to
be working fine with the exception of files in the 9GB+ range in size - I
keep getting an error relating to the files not being the same - I don't
That is basically what I do when setting up a new client for remote backups.
I copy their data to an external drive of some sort, then to the destination
server. Then remote backups will keep things updated from there.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I do the NT backup of the exchange to a .bkf file, then rsync that file. My
largest was about 12GB and it took about 1 hour and transferred about 300MB
of data across the net. I had to use rsync 3.x to make this work, though.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
Hello,
First, I have to compliment the crew on the documentation. It's solid.
Running on Ubuntu 12.04.3, I was using rsync to synchronize a 5T
filesystem across two servers. The default Ubuntu configuration is to
run rsync over ssh, conveniently the way I prefer it.
Initially, it
Hello Rsync List,
I have a directory that I am running an incremental sync (version 3.026)
between AIX and Linux. The directory that I am asking you about has
about 43 million symbolic links. I am using the flag to process links
only and had been seeing about 1.5 million links processed in a 12
this and possibly
how to correct it?
Thanks!
Brad
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
47 matches
Mail list logo
